134a Refrigerant
#3351
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmdfrt96004a0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> >> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
> >> all
> >> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
>
> > Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
>
> WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
> elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> > saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> > components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
>
> only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
> stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
> was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
> desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> .....that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
"Oh Lord... kum bah yah."
__
Steve
..
#3352
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmdfrt96004a0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> >> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
> >> all
> >> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
>
> > Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
>
> WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
> elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> > saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> > components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
>
> only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
> stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
> was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
> desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> .....that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
"Oh Lord... kum bah yah."
__
Steve
..
#3353
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmdfrt96004a0@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:I1GCe.139$LF.76@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net...
> >> yeah no ----! refrigerant is a compound, a MIXTURE and when you add up
> >> all
> >> the components they are heavier than the individual components.
>
> > Two big mistakes... mistaking compound for mixture
>
> WRONG. i clearly defined it as a compound as shown above. "mixture" was an
> elaboration to put it into terms you could hopefully understand.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> > saying that the mixture weighs more than the individual
> > components. I almost pissed myself, laughing!
>
> only because youre to ------- stupid to comprehend plain english. i was
> stating that it was even harder for refrigerant to rise above air because it
> was heavier than its individual components. of course, youre so pitifully
> desperate that its understandable you would grasp in such a manner.
"Someone's spinning, Lord.... kum bah yah...."....
> .....that and that youre dirt stupid. :-)
"Oh Lord... kum bah yah."
__
Steve
..
#3354
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmeke3t43d60f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> > >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> > >popular use.
> >
> > .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> > fits
> > your argument. liar.
>
> > Show the lie... or FOAD.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
>
> you are a liar stephen.
You no show lie... *you* big lie!
> > You don't have a clue about your limitations
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
Indeed you are!
>
> lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
See below...
> > because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> > you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
>
> No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
>
> LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
> was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
Hmmm.... "otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the
HMC'.... so you don't replace the HMC when the weather's cold?
> > You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> > in another condition! I must be right!
>
> what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
> news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
> day.
More spin from Mr. Lame... let's look at the original challenge:
Jeff:
>> Five years of engineering school for my BS, some additional grad school to
>> round things out a bit. Thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer in
>> addition to three years each of chemistry and physics.
Nate:
>great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch.
Perhaps you can spin us up a temperature from some
of your words above.
>
> liar.
See above...
> > >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
Indeed it does! Still smarting from that 'mixture'
***-kicking?
....
> > Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
Indeed you don't! Especially not to this little
gem...
<>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Respond to that, if you dare.
__
Steve
..
#3355
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmeke3t43d60f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> > >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> > >popular use.
> >
> > .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> > fits
> > your argument. liar.
>
> > Show the lie... or FOAD.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
>
> you are a liar stephen.
You no show lie... *you* big lie!
> > You don't have a clue about your limitations
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
Indeed you are!
>
> lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
See below...
> > because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> > you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
>
> No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
>
> LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
> was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
Hmmm.... "otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the
HMC'.... so you don't replace the HMC when the weather's cold?
> > You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> > in another condition! I must be right!
>
> what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
> news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
> day.
More spin from Mr. Lame... let's look at the original challenge:
Jeff:
>> Five years of engineering school for my BS, some additional grad school to
>> round things out a bit. Thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer in
>> addition to three years each of chemistry and physics.
Nate:
>great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch.
Perhaps you can spin us up a temperature from some
of your words above.
>
> liar.
See above...
> > >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
Indeed it does! Still smarting from that 'mixture'
***-kicking?
....
> > Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
Indeed you don't! Especially not to this little
gem...
<>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Respond to that, if you dare.
__
Steve
..
#3356
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmeke3t43d60f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> > >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> > >popular use.
> >
> > .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> > fits
> > your argument. liar.
>
> > Show the lie... or FOAD.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
>
> you are a liar stephen.
You no show lie... *you* big lie!
> > You don't have a clue about your limitations
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
Indeed you are!
>
> lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
See below...
> > because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> > you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
>
> No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
>
> LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
> was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
Hmmm.... "otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the
HMC'.... so you don't replace the HMC when the weather's cold?
> > You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> > in another condition! I must be right!
>
> what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
> news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
> day.
More spin from Mr. Lame... let's look at the original challenge:
Jeff:
>> Five years of engineering school for my BS, some additional grad school to
>> round things out a bit. Thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer in
>> addition to three years each of chemistry and physics.
Nate:
>great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch.
Perhaps you can spin us up a temperature from some
of your words above.
>
> liar.
See above...
> > >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
Indeed it does! Still smarting from that 'mixture'
***-kicking?
....
> > Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
Indeed you don't! Especially not to this little
gem...
<>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Respond to that, if you dare.
__
Steve
..
#3357
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11dmeke3t43d60f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:D9GCe.142$LF.108@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net.. .
>
> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11dfim8sma1bea3@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> > news:keJBe.1505$zw4.845@newssvr12.news.prodigy.com ...
> > >I find all kinds of references to it otherwise... I claim
> > >popular use.
> >
> > .....what a dumbass. you cannot change an entire industry because it
> > fits
> > your argument. liar.
>
> > Show the lie... or FOAD.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
>
> you are a liar stephen.
You no show lie... *you* big lie!
> > You don't have a clue about your limitations
>
> TRANSLATION --> "im to insecure to admit to mine"
Indeed you are!
>
> lol...i know stephen. youre such big liar youve even convinced yourself.
See below...
> > because its irrelevant dumb ***. the criteria was subzero temps otherwise
> > you would have no excuse not to change the HMC.
>
> No, the criteria was replacement of the HMC on a rooftop
>
> LIAR! once again your lies will not cut it! i CLEARLY stated the ambient
> was -14 otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the HMC.
Hmmm.... "otherwise there would be no reason not to replace the
HMC'.... so you don't replace the HMC when the weather's cold?
> > You're *really* grasping at straws now... trying to weasel
> > in another condition! I must be right!
>
> what a filthy little LIAR you are! trying to "weasel in a condition"? see
> news:11cbop8lt1q84d@corp.supernews.com where i CLEARLY said a -30 degree
> day.
More spin from Mr. Lame... let's look at the original challenge:
Jeff:
>> Five years of engineering school for my BS, some additional grad school to
>> round things out a bit. Thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer in
>> addition to three years each of chemistry and physics.
Nate:
>great! now give me an alternative to replacing an HMC in a pinch.
Perhaps you can spin us up a temperature from some
of your words above.
>
> liar.
See above...
> > >ohh.... calling me a liar some more! **** up a rope.
>
> TRANSLATION --> "the truth hurts"
Indeed it does! Still smarting from that 'mixture'
***-kicking?
....
> > Keep squirming... it's fun to watch!
>
> TRANSLATION --> "youre right, i have no response"
Indeed you don't! Especially not to this little
gem...
<>
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent ignorance.
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
Respond to that, if you dare.
__
Steve
..
#3358
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42DB3AEE.BABD6BB3@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
....
> > I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> > asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> > How's that for complex?
> Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
> Algebra.
OK... if you'll go with me.
Still think volume = density?
What about that Equator air?
__
Steve
..
#3359
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42DB3AEE.BABD6BB3@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
....
> > I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> > asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> > How's that for complex?
> Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
> Algebra.
OK... if you'll go with me.
Still think volume = density?
What about that Equator air?
__
Steve
..
#3360
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42DB3AEE.BABD6BB3@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
....
> > I merely compared it to Pi = 3... I never
> > asserted that you asserted that Pi = 3.
> > How's that for complex?
> Sure. I think you should go back to seventh grade science, and
> Algebra.
OK... if you'll go with me.
Still think volume = density?
What about that Equator air?
__
Steve
..