134a Refrigerant
#1021
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Who is Jeff Gannon?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon?
>
> : )
> __
> Steve
> .
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...=Google+Search
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Is he stranger than Jeff Gannon?
>
> : )
> __
> Steve
> .
#1022
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Obviously, you didn't get the fact that there are the north east
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
#1023
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Obviously, you didn't get the fact that there are the north east
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
#1024
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Obviously, you didn't get the fact that there are the north east
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
#1025
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
Obviously, you didn't get the fact that there are the north east
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
trade winds and there are south east trade winds, in their respective
hemispheres, separated from each other naturally at the equator:
http://gpc.edu/~pgore/Earth&Space/GPS/wind.html
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Stephen Cowell wrote:
>
> Question: Who do *you* believe, Dave? Remember
> the trade winds?
>
> Obviously, there's no convincing going on...
> but I'm having fun wiping up the floor.
> As long as Nate keeps weebling back up,
> I'm punching...
> __
> Steve
#1026
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1027
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1028
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1029
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:BP5re.168$kX4.7@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com...
> Yes, you still want to play dumbass.
well yeah, but being the dumbass comes so easy for you that it almost takes
the fun out of it.
almost. :-)
> Let's see... you didn't capitalize the first word of the sentences,
> you left the apostrophe off of I'm,
BUWHAHAHA!
TRANSLATION --> "i cannot defeat your logic and proof so ill attack your
grammar" :-)
usually attacking grammer comes before the "my personal emails" bit, but for
the most part youre on course.
> and you believe that
> Freon is heavier than air
it is, as clearly proven in my links:
from http://www.bacharach-training.com/methods.htm near the bottom under
electronic leak detectors:
"Refrigerant has a higher specific volume than air, therefore refrigerants
will fall when exposed to atmospheric pressures. This means leak detecting
on the bottom sides of the piping or components will be more effective in
detecting a leak and will save you time."
from http://tif.com/manuals/TIFZX1.pdf (operating manual of the electronic
leak detector that i personally use):
"Be aware that refrigerants are invariably heavier than air and will tend to
fall from or collect below actual leak points/sources. Searching below
areas of potential leaks is invariably the most effective and reliable way
of finding such."
:-)
> but Argon is not.
there you go being a LIAR again. i never suggested argon was lighter than
air. i clearly stated that the concentration wasnt enough to be a problem.
i understand why you must lie, throw personal insults, and spin....it is
afterall what youre left with....but if youre going to lie at least come up
with _something_ ive actually said.
> Like I said, %100 for me... and %100 for me here
lol to top it off youre a narcissist. ok ramjw, bow to the mightly liberal.
lol.
> I'm the scientist
lol.....you just keeping getting better and better.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#1030
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:RR5re.169$kX4.168@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com. ..
> you don't know enough to hold the probe
> both under and *downwind* of the leak?
now you know what i know? oh yes omnipotent liberal. we quake at your
presence.
btw, you do know what comes after personal insults, "my personal emails",
and attacking grammar dont you? i bet i can tell you what your next move
will be. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com