[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
#551
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Diogenes wrote:
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
#552
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Diogenes wrote:
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
#553
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Diogenes wrote:
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
#554
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
#555
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
#556
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
#557
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
"Diogenes" <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote in
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
news:eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranew s.com:
> David Barnes wrote:
>
>> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>
>>> David Barnes wrote:
>>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>>> says.
>>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>>
>>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>>
>> Things like this:
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
>> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
>> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
>> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
>> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>>
>> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some
> help!
He's even resorted to citing from a Mexican --------- organization that
wants to overthrow the US government in the American southwest and have
those states secede from the union:
http://aztlan.net
They also want to forcibly expel all non-Hispanics from the American
Southwest.
#558
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.
#559
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.
#560
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <eb26d2b1c10c889f0973e77eca4af701@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> David Barnes wrote:
> >>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> >>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
> >>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>>>
> >>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
> >>>> says.
> >>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
> >>
> >> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
> >>
> > Things like this:
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> > http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> > w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> > http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> > http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
> >
> > There are a lot more, but I made my point.
>
> Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
> unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
>
> All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
<Yawn> When people start attacking the source, you know you have them
by the *****.