[OT] No fresh meat for Florida faggots
#541
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
> >>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> > These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>
> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>
Things like this:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> David Barnes wrote:
> > In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
> > Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
> >
> >> Douglas Berry wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call upon
> >>> the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
> >>
> >> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually says.
> > These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>
> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>
Things like this:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
There are a lot more, but I made my point.
#542
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
#543
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
#544
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
#545
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
> David Fritzinger wrote:
>> In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
>> "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
>>
>>> David Fritzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>> The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
>>>>
>>>> Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could you
>>>> back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
>>>
>>> You soft poof.
>>
>> Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
>> banned.
>
> It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
> society, along with rapists and child molesters.
>
> Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things even
> though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys and
> getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
> raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
> that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
> ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
> has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
> clause.
>
> Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
> filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
> acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
> head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
> the head but I digress.
>
> Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
> because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
> A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
> fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
> acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
> to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
> material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
> and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
> prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
> the results would not be sound.
>
> As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
> natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
> becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
> this for many thousands of years.
>
> Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
> ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
> targets for a cull.
>
> Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be culled
> first.
>
> Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
> the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
> which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
>
I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
over-crowding. When can we get started?
--
Diogenes
#546
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
#547
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
#548
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
#549
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
David Barnes wrote:
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
> In article <aea39e6c91b3f8c8cb50d7c962651588@news.teranews.co m>,
> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>
>> David Barnes wrote:
>>> In article <a605c335835a523cd1c43f49c3e202f1@news.teranews.co m>,
>>> Diogenes <diogenes@sinope.gr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Douglas Berry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When discussing the laws of the United States, you cannot call
>>>>> upon the Bible as an authority. Read the First Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> Take your own advice. And, try to understand what it actually
>>>> says.
>>> These days, under the Republicans, it means little.
>>
>> And your total--------- statement is based on what.
>>
> Things like this:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/09/sc...pes/index.html
> http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/Northeast...reut/http://ww
> w.greenpeace.org/international_en/features/details?item_id=327510
> http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeS...?ID=13694&c=86
> http://www.warblogging.com/archives/000655.php
>
> There are a lot more, but I made my point.
Quoting CNN, Greenpeace, ACLU, etc. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! -------
unbelievable! Why not quote the DNC?
All you've done is to prove that you are a total ----wit. Get some help!
--
Diogenes
#550
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: [OT] No fresh meat for Florida *******
Diogenes wrote:
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com
| Lord Gazwad of Grantham wrote:
|| David Fritzinger wrote:
||| In article <Xm08mKfbwD2509AFDEB8lMbF1oKWJfLn@www.3-win.com>,
||| "Lord Gazwad of Grantham" <nospam@gazwad.com> wrote:
|||
|||| David Fritzinger wrote:
||||
|||||| The facts that homosexuality is legal harms society.
|||||
||||| Just because you make the statement doesn't make it true. Could
||||| you back up your ridiculous assertion? I didn't think so.
||||
|||| You soft poof.
|||
||| Brilliant response! You have convinced me that homosexuals should be
||| banned.
||
|| It's up to the ------ to prove that they have a place in _normal_
|| society, along with rapists and child molesters.
||
|| Of course, a ------ will try to distance himself from such things
|| even though deep down ******* desires include molesting young boys
|| and getting normal people drunk so they can try to turn them gay by
|| raping them. This seems to go hand in hand with the ******* assertion
|| that everyone is actually gay, a ludicrous and desperate statement.
|| ******* also tend to make accusations towards anyone's sexuality who
|| has attacked gays. For some reason they think it's a viable getout
|| clause.
||
|| Imagine if anyone who expressed a dislike for the way pakis ------
|| filth was to be met by accusations that they are really a paki. Not
|| acceptable and clearly the babblings of someone who is ----ed in the
|| head. For this reason we can conclude that ******* are also ----ed in
|| the head but I digress.
||
|| Whilst it seems acceptable to cull seals and to slaughter foxes
|| because they are a nuisance to mankind, ******* are allowed to live.
|| A ------ has no use in society and is a lot more destructive than a
|| fox or a seal. ******* smell funny and commit unnatural, indecent
|| acts, surely those two facts alone are enough to convince good people
|| to cull all *******. It would be a good experiment to destroy all gay
|| material and to rid the entire planet of everyone and everything gay
|| and then see if new ******* get born. However since we could never
|| prove that we had completely eradicated ******* in the first place
|| the results would not be sound.
||
|| As the world stands, it is severely over-populated and running out of
|| natural resources. Natural cullings (war and famine for example) are
|| becoming less frequent so we must cull to survive, humans have done
|| this for many thousands of years.
||
|| Since people tend to whine too much if we chose to cull all the
|| ****** or all the sand ******* then we should look at more agreeable
|| targets for a cull.
||
|| Naturally, those who are not part of a normal society should be
|| culled first.
||
|| Mass murderers, thieves, rapists, muggers, I am sure you could add to
|| the list but it is clear that the predominant yet unnatural minority
|| which is ripe for a cull is the ------.
||
|
| I believe you have laid out a sound and viable solution to Earth's
| over-crowding. When can we get started?
AIDS has already been released, we are currently working on AIIDS
It too is an arsehole injected death sentence, only immediate except for a
few carriers.
--
Gazwad
Freelance scientist and people tester.
Guardian: alt.os.windows-xp
Moderator: alt.warez.uk
www.gazwad.com