ZJ - engine options
07-01-2005, 06:20 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Glad to see my subliminal was caught, LoL
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
07-01-2005, 06:20 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Glad to see my subliminal was caught, LoL
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
07-01-2005, 06:20 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Glad to see my subliminal was caught, LoL
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
07-01-2005, 06:20 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Glad to see my subliminal was caught, LoL
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
--
Coasty
SEMPAR PARATUS
(ALWAYS READY)
Remove The SPOOGE To Reply
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KeKdnROJHqV0JVjfRVn-iA@comcast.com...
> Coasty proclaimed:
>
>> Well the last year you could get the 4.0L was 2004, you have to get the
>> V-6 or V-8. If you just want to get from point A to point B the V-6 is a
>> good engine and has the best GPM.
>>
>
> GPM != Grins Per Mile
>
07-05-2005, 06:00 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Njord Noatun <sigurdk@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
07-05-2005, 06:00 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Njord Noatun <sigurdk@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
07-05-2005, 06:00 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Njord Noatun <sigurdk@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
07-05-2005, 06:00 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ZJ - engine options
Njord Noatun <sigurdk@REMOVETHISyahoo.com> wrote:
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
> I am considering cars up to a couple of years old, so the 4.0L straight
> is still in the running.
>
> :-)
>
> So my question should read, more generically: Of all the different
> engine options offered in 2002-4 ZJs, which one will be the most
> reliable, durable, and give me the lowest cost of ownership (not
> including gasoline) over an expected cycle of, say, the next five
> years/60,000 miles?
>
I thought ZJ's were 93-98 model year Grand Cherokess. 99-2004 GC's are
WJ's, aren't they?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)