Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   YJ front locker? (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/yj-front-locker-45202/)

SnoMan 04-09-2007 10:33 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:46:44 GMT, RoyJ <spamless@microsoft.net> wrote:

>And the OP's YJ has an axle disconnect that makes your comments irrelevant.



Typical troll again because when you use the front axle under power it
has to have wheels turn at a different speeds in a turn due to physics
involved and then there is the fact that Ujoints are not constant
velocity in a turn so they complicate this further and the net result
is nasty driveline bind and wheels having to skid in a turn and loose
traction and reduce truning radius. (not to mention strain of front
axles, joints and stub shafts) You would know this if you really knew
about the physics involved but your knowledge is very limited here and
push button 4x4 drive was made just for "people" like you. I tell it
like it is not like you want to believe it is. Listen and read
sometimes and you might just learn something.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com

Carl S 04-09-2007 10:38 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
Sno,

I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
afford.

Carl


"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>if want to see eyes light up
>>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

>
>
> This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> try to drive and manuver it.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com




Carl S 04-09-2007 10:38 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
Sno,

I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
afford.

Carl


"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>if want to see eyes light up
>>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

>
>
> This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> try to drive and manuver it.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com




Carl S 04-09-2007 10:38 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
Sno,

I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
afford.

Carl


"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
>>if want to see eyes light up
>>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

>
>
> This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> try to drive and manuver it.
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com




Spdloader 04-09-2007 10:39 AM

Re: Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 

"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:74jk139kn3917prcnhu8sr4ouikefuu2cc@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:29:36 -0400, "Spdloader"
> <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>First, you're an idiot snojob.
>>Second, no one invited your -------- here.
>>Third, if you spent any quality time in this group at all, you'd know that

>
>
> Once a troll always a troll as you just cannot get it out of your
> blood can you. You may think your are being cute but others can see
> you for what you are. Some come here looking for advise and some like
> you come here to make jokes and act like a troll. Knock yourself out!
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com


Don't say I didn't warn you. The folks in this group won't put up with your
ridiculous crap nearly as long as the ones in the Ford Trucks group did
before they see you for what you are. Can you not take a hint?

Go away.

Spdloader




Spdloader 04-09-2007 10:39 AM

Re: Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 

"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:74jk139kn3917prcnhu8sr4ouikefuu2cc@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:29:36 -0400, "Spdloader"
> <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>First, you're an idiot snojob.
>>Second, no one invited your -------- here.
>>Third, if you spent any quality time in this group at all, you'd know that

>
>
> Once a troll always a troll as you just cannot get it out of your
> blood can you. You may think your are being cute but others can see
> you for what you are. Some come here looking for advise and some like
> you come here to make jokes and act like a troll. Knock yourself out!
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com


Don't say I didn't warn you. The folks in this group won't put up with your
ridiculous crap nearly as long as the ones in the Ford Trucks group did
before they see you for what you are. Can you not take a hint?

Go away.

Spdloader




Spdloader 04-09-2007 10:39 AM

Re: Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 

"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:74jk139kn3917prcnhu8sr4ouikefuu2cc@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 09:29:36 -0400, "Spdloader"
> <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>First, you're an idiot snojob.
>>Second, no one invited your -------- here.
>>Third, if you spent any quality time in this group at all, you'd know that

>
>
> Once a troll always a troll as you just cannot get it out of your
> blood can you. You may think your are being cute but others can see
> you for what you are. Some come here looking for advise and some like
> you come here to make jokes and act like a troll. Knock yourself out!
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com


Don't say I didn't warn you. The folks in this group won't put up with your
ridiculous crap nearly as long as the ones in the Ford Trucks group did
before they see you for what you are. Can you not take a hint?

Go away.

Spdloader




Earle Horton 04-09-2007 11:46 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
No one answered my question about the front axle disconnect and the YJ's
solid hub. If you put a locker in front, does it free-wheel, or does it
continuously crank the drive shaft and front axle? Anyone care to venture
whether it affects handling or not?

Earle

"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fudnUR2B7Rj0ofbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Sno,
>
> I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
> comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
> looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
> Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
> afford.
>
> Carl
>
>
> "SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> > <----------@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >>if want to see eyes light up
> >>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

> >
> >
> > This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> > try to drive and manuver it.
> > -----------------
> > TheSnoMan.com

>
>




Earle Horton 04-09-2007 11:46 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
No one answered my question about the front axle disconnect and the YJ's
solid hub. If you put a locker in front, does it free-wheel, or does it
continuously crank the drive shaft and front axle? Anyone care to venture
whether it affects handling or not?

Earle

"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fudnUR2B7Rj0ofbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Sno,
>
> I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
> comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
> looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
> Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
> afford.
>
> Carl
>
>
> "SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> > <----------@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >>if want to see eyes light up
> >>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

> >
> >
> > This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> > try to drive and manuver it.
> > -----------------
> > TheSnoMan.com

>
>




Earle Horton 04-09-2007 11:46 AM

Re: Re: YJ front locker?
 
No one answered my question about the front axle disconnect and the YJ's
solid hub. If you put a locker in front, does it free-wheel, or does it
continuously crank the drive shaft and front axle? Anyone care to venture
whether it affects handling or not?

Earle

"Carl S" <carlsaiyed@REMOVE.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4fudnUR2B7Rj0ofbnZ2dnUVZ_vKunZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Sno,
>
> I agree that the lunchbox is a poor choice for a front axle when it
> comes to the ability to turn the jeep while in 4x4. However, if someone is
> looking for a cheap way to get locked up in the front, it works great.
> Sometimes you must compromise to get a trail-capable machine that you can
> afford.
>
> Carl
>
>
> "SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
> news:rfdk1393c8f3711nemg3efv42d00sa7okb@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:07:34 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
> > <----------@cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >>if want to see eyes light up
> >>as you crawl passed them, go Lincoln Locker:

> >
> >
> > This is the absolute poorest choice for a front axle. Just do that and
> > try to drive and manuver it.
> > -----------------
> > TheSnoMan.com

>
>





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:47 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.04354 seconds with 5 queries