Wrangler - What to buy?
11-28-2005, 03:42 PM
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
= 112 lb)
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> Hi Will,
> Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >
> > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
in
> > > the back of your car?
> > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have you
> > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
nose
> > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty road
> > > with the rear flap open.
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Tomes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
might take
> > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > Tomes
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea
= 112 lb)
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> Hi Will,
> Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >
> > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
in
> > > the back of your car?
> > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have you
> > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
nose
> > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty road
> > > with the rear flap open.
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Tomes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
might take
> > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > Tomes
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea
11-28-2005, 03:42 PM
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
= 112 lb)
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> Hi Will,
> Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >
> > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
in
> > > the back of your car?
> > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have you
> > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
nose
> > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty road
> > > with the rear flap open.
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Tomes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
might take
> > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > Tomes
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea
= 112 lb)
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> Hi Will,
> Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Will Honea wrote:
> >
> > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> >
> > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >
> > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
in
> > > the back of your car?
> > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have you
> > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
nose
> > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty road
> > > with the rear flap open.
> > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > Tomes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
might take
> > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > Tomes
> >
> > --
> > Will Honea
11-28-2005, 03:46 PM
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yours is also called a "long ton". It is equal to 1.016 metric tons. 2000
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
11-28-2005, 03:46 PM
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yours is also called a "long ton". It is equal to 1.016 metric tons. 2000
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
11-28-2005, 03:46 PM
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yours is also called a "long ton". It is equal to 1.016 metric tons. 2000
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
pounds is a "short ton", equal to 0.907 metric tons.
Earle
"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:FYJif.17385$Lw5.2520@text.news.blueyonder.co. uk...
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:438A1E87.11DFE649@***.net...
> > Hi Will,
> > Well they're not that heavy here, I remember throwing them around
> > at six years old without hooks, and I'm sure the baling wire would have
> > cut through my hands if they were heavier than:
> > http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/onslow/AG/hay/tips.html
> > I guess you're talking about a full sized Jeep truck, because not
> > even in an old brochure were they silly enough to suggest they carry a
> > bale of hay: http://www.apple.queensu.ca/CJ3B/FarmJeep.html
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Will Honea wrote:
> > >
> > > Bill, my old man prided himself on consistent 90 pound bales for
> > > peanut or oat hay - and having spent more than a few days loading hay
> > > for him before he went to the round bales I'm sure that it was a
> > > minimum. The ones at the end of the day must have weighed at least
> > > 250 pounds apiece. If memory serves, 6 bales is a good fit for a
> > > wrangler with the rear seat out.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:34:28 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
> > > <----------@***.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > A bale of hay weighs fifty pounds, can you picture six of these
> in
> > > > the back of your car?
> > > > http://www.nnu.edu/athletics/crossco...hay%20bale.jpg And have
you
> > > > driven down the road with the dust form a feed sake, clogging your
> nose
> > > > and eyes? A cazillion times worse than just driving down a dusty
road
> > > > with the rear flap open.
> > > > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Tomes wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > 300 pounds is like 2 people in the back seat. I suspect that he
> might take
> > > > > the back seat out and have plenty of room for the feed.
> > > > > Tomes
> > >
> > > --
> > > Will Honea
>
>
11-28-2005, 03:53 PM
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
11-28-2005, 03:53 PM
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
11-28-2005, 03:53 PM
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred weight
> = 112 lb)
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
11-29-2005, 12:47 PM
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
We have an all up weight of 44 metric tonnes ( 97,000 lb) for 6 axled
artics.
How much did your trucks + trailers weigh, Bill ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438B6E42.F9D3C0F5@***.net...
> Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
> truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
> least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> > = 112 lb)
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
artics.
How much did your trucks + trailers weigh, Bill ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438B6E42.F9D3C0F5@***.net...
> Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
> truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
> least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> > = 112 lb)
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
11-29-2005, 12:47 PM
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wrangler - What to buy?
We have an all up weight of 44 metric tonnes ( 97,000 lb) for 6 axled
artics.
How much did your trucks + trailers weigh, Bill ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438B6E42.F9D3C0F5@***.net...
> Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
> truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
> least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> > = 112 lb)
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
artics.
How much did your trucks + trailers weigh, Bill ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:438B6E42.F9D3C0F5@***.net...
> Yep, eighty thousand pounds, or forty tons is what the legal gross
> truck load limit, without special permits and pilot cars. The UK at
> least in Canada is weird on their gallons, too.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Dave Milne wrote:
> >
> > Is there really 2000lb in a ton ? We have it at 2240 ( 20 x 1 hundred
weight
> > = 112 lb)
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ