Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...? (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/who-said-i-didnt-need-lockers-6688/)

L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 10-30-2003 05:00 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
UNDERSTAND IT! You must keep all wheels rolling to keep steering
control, and headed down hill.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 10-30-2003 05:00 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
UNDERSTAND IT! You must keep all wheels rolling to keep steering
control, and headed down hill.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.


CRWLR 10-30-2003 05:04 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
It matters alot. The recovery of sliding is not the application of more
brakes, it is the application of more gas. If you are rolling along using
the brakes as the sole means of controlling speed, then you are asking for
trouble. The best way to control speed is to use the correct gear, and
gentle applications of the brakes and gas, depending upon what is happening
and the surface you are driving on.

If you rely upon the brakes alone to regulate your speed, then the vehicle
can quickly attain an uncontrollable attitude that can result in excess
speed, and severe angles of slope.

TJim said that LO range, 1st gear is best, but this is not always true.
Sometimes LO and 2nd is better. It really depends on many factors. His point
is that the best thing is the drive train should be taking the load, not the
braking system.





"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0310301342.312bba13@posting.google.c om...
> > On those downhills,
> > use engine braking whenever you can: 4wd Low and 1st gear. Using the
> > vehicle brakes by themselves is begging for a rollover.

>
> Jim,
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.



CRWLR 10-30-2003 05:04 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
It matters alot. The recovery of sliding is not the application of more
brakes, it is the application of more gas. If you are rolling along using
the brakes as the sole means of controlling speed, then you are asking for
trouble. The best way to control speed is to use the correct gear, and
gentle applications of the brakes and gas, depending upon what is happening
and the surface you are driving on.

If you rely upon the brakes alone to regulate your speed, then the vehicle
can quickly attain an uncontrollable attitude that can result in excess
speed, and severe angles of slope.

TJim said that LO range, 1st gear is best, but this is not always true.
Sometimes LO and 2nd is better. It really depends on many factors. His point
is that the best thing is the drive train should be taking the load, not the
braking system.





"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0310301342.312bba13@posting.google.c om...
> > On those downhills,
> > use engine braking whenever you can: 4wd Low and 1st gear. Using the
> > vehicle brakes by themselves is begging for a rollover.

>
> Jim,
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.



CRWLR 10-30-2003 05:04 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
It matters alot. The recovery of sliding is not the application of more
brakes, it is the application of more gas. If you are rolling along using
the brakes as the sole means of controlling speed, then you are asking for
trouble. The best way to control speed is to use the correct gear, and
gentle applications of the brakes and gas, depending upon what is happening
and the surface you are driving on.

If you rely upon the brakes alone to regulate your speed, then the vehicle
can quickly attain an uncontrollable attitude that can result in excess
speed, and severe angles of slope.

TJim said that LO range, 1st gear is best, but this is not always true.
Sometimes LO and 2nd is better. It really depends on many factors. His point
is that the best thing is the drive train should be taking the load, not the
braking system.





"Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:b102b6e4.0310301342.312bba13@posting.google.c om...
> > On those downhills,
> > use engine braking whenever you can: 4wd Low and 1st gear. Using the
> > vehicle brakes by themselves is begging for a rollover.

>
> Jim,
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.



L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 10-30-2003 05:09 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
Yup, my Dad told of many modifications he did, like add another
transmission, bolt washers to the top of the piston to increase
compression. They were limited by only their imagination, a very
different world from all the regulations we have to put up with.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There was/is also available a 4-wheel drive conversion kit for the Model T as
> well..
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 10-30-2003 05:09 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
Yup, my Dad told of many modifications he did, like add another
transmission, bolt washers to the top of the piston to increase
compression. They were limited by only their imagination, a very
different world from all the regulations we have to put up with.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There was/is also available a 4-wheel drive conversion kit for the Model T as
> well..
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 10-30-2003 05:09 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
Yup, my Dad told of many modifications he did, like add another
transmission, bolt washers to the top of the piston to increase
compression. They were limited by only their imagination, a very
different world from all the regulations we have to put up with.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There was/is also available a 4-wheel drive conversion kit for the Model T as
> well..
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html


Mike Romain 10-30-2003 05:15 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> > On those downhills,
> > use engine braking whenever you can: 4wd Low and 1st gear. Using the
> > vehicle brakes by themselves is begging for a rollover.

>
> Jim,
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.


He is talking about control. 'Never' go down a hill in neutral or with
the clutch in!

If you rely on the brakes, you lose steering way to fast or the rear
tires lock and slide out and you tend to nose dive because 60% plus the
down angle means more like 80% of the braking resistance is on the front
tires.

Also the springs aren't torque loaded, this makes the vehicle 'float'
down the hill with loose springs. The body floats on the axles instead
of being sucked down to them under torque. A perfect combo for a 45 deg
slide and maybe flip.

I do disagree with 1st low though.

I climb sand pit walls and go back down them and 1st is too low, all 4
tires start skidding. I use 2nd low mostly, sometimes 3rd and some
gentle taps on the brake while still in gear. Staying in gear prevents
the front or rear tires from locking up when gentle braking or you would
stall the engine.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

Mike Romain 10-30-2003 05:15 PM

Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
 
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> > On those downhills,
> > use engine braking whenever you can: 4wd Low and 1st gear. Using the
> > vehicle brakes by themselves is begging for a rollover.

>
> Jim,
>
> I don't understand this advice. It seems to me that the physics of
> the jeep and whether it is going to roll over or not has to do with
> the weight of the rig, speed, and angle of the slope. It shouldn't
> really matter one way or the other what type of mechanism is slowing
> the tires down.


He is talking about control. 'Never' go down a hill in neutral or with
the clutch in!

If you rely on the brakes, you lose steering way to fast or the rear
tires lock and slide out and you tend to nose dive because 60% plus the
down angle means more like 80% of the braking resistance is on the front
tires.

Also the springs aren't torque loaded, this makes the vehicle 'float'
down the hill with loose springs. The body floats on the axles instead
of being sucked down to them under torque. A perfect combo for a 45 deg
slide and maybe flip.

I do disagree with 1st low though.

I climb sand pit walls and go back down them and 1st is too low, all 4
tires start skidding. I use 2nd low mostly, sometimes 3rd and some
gentle taps on the brake while still in gear. Staying in gear prevents
the front or rear tires from locking up when gentle braking or you would
stall the engine.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.09540 seconds with 8 queries