What tire to buy
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F7DD4B8.8B8C4210@***.net...
> Not if tires are spinning at seventy miles an hour.
lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
clean the lugs.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:3F7DD4B8.8B8C4210@***.net...
> Not if tires are spinning at seventy miles an hour.
lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
clean the lugs.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F7DD4B8.8B8C4210@***.net...
> Not if tires are spinning at seventy miles an hour.
lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
clean the lugs.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
news:3F7DD4B8.8B8C4210@***.net...
> Not if tires are spinning at seventy miles an hour.
lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
clean the lugs.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
Yeah, I'll agree with that. I'm not talking about mud bogging, just
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
Yeah, I'll agree with that. I'm not talking about mud bogging, just
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
Yeah, I'll agree with that. I'm not talking about mud bogging, just
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
traversing muddy spots. I'd only be in low range if it was necessary for
what I just passed, or what was coming up directly. Maybe I'll try a
little more RPM and see if they clean off faster. Both of the MT/Rs and
the ATs tend to cake up into a slick on me. I was a little disappointed.
Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
>
>>Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> "twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Hhkfb.279$gP3.140701744@newssvr11.news.prodig y.com...
> > Well, both. They just gum up as quick as the ATs.
>
> i think the mtr is getting an unfair reputation in mud because so many
> rubicon owners are mudding with them in low range. at a 4 to 1 ratio, you
> cannot possibly generate enough wheel spin to clean the lugs so in low range
> in the mud, you effectively have a slick. the only way that any mud tire
> can be effective is through wheelspin. lots and lots of wheel spin and you
> just arent going to get it in 4 low over a 4 to 1 ratio. stomp the go pedal
> in 4 high and the mtr does surprisingly well in mud. not as well as the
> trxus mud terrains i had, but id rate them equal to my bfg mt's in the mud
> (and superior to them in the rocks).
>
> --
Well, you are right, but you are wrong....
Spinning the wheels to clear lugs is way easier in low range, but the
traction factor so the tires grab and don't need a spin to clear them is
way better in a higher range/gear depending on the driver.
When I run mud, I use 3rd low so I have a 'punchy' gas pedal 'to a
point'. I can keep total power climbing a sand pit wall in 3rd low at
400 rpm even, without spinning the tires.
If you spin, you are done in fast in either situation.
If you have some speed up in 1st or 2nd in 4 high and the tires pack, a
quick spin at high rpm can clear them because you have the momentum to
keep you moving.
If you are spinning them from the get go in low, they are packed and
will stay packed, you need to move for them to clear or you just dig
holes.
I now have 'really' high traction tires and the mud pits just aren't any
fun any more. With the lower traction 10.5's I used to run I would have
mud everywhere so at least the clean up after or the 'wow' factor was
'worth' it. Now I just purr through and don't even show any mud on the
Jeep for all the same cleaning of the brakes, etc. that is needed
anyway....
If I want to show mud up top, I have to 'Baja' the mud hole after it is
well chewed up so just the splash will give me mud up top....
Hey, on the normal trails I run, I 'want' the no spin traction, but off
in the mud playground with a couple hundred folks watching, well....
'Hey, you just cruised on through there, cool', just doesn't cut it for
the after clean needed....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
It's tough to make that decision to lower the air pressure, knowing
if you don't try to climb the dune you'll save yourself a half an hour
of work.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
> youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
> clean the lugs.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
if you don't try to climb the dune you'll save yourself a half an hour
of work.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
> youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
> clean the lugs.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What tire to buy
It's tough to make that decision to lower the air pressure, knowing
if you don't try to climb the dune you'll save yourself a half an hour
of work.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
> youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
> clean the lugs.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com
if you don't try to climb the dune you'll save yourself a half an hour
of work.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Nathan W. Collier" wrote:
>
> lol......bingo! if you look at my tach at http://7slotgrille.com/beach
> youll see what 4 to 1 does. you just cant get the wheelspin required to
> clean the lugs.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://7SlotGrille.com