What if the Nazis were nice?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
Ditto, like my new.***.net server did to the original.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Sorry, I shoulda trimmed the groups.
>
> Having said that, I woulda trimmed this group and left the others.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Sorry, I shoulda trimmed the groups.
>
> Having said that, I woulda trimmed this group and left the others.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
Ditto, like my new.***.net server did to the original.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Sorry, I shoulda trimmed the groups.
>
> Having said that, I woulda trimmed this group and left the others.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Sorry, I shoulda trimmed the groups.
>
> Having said that, I woulda trimmed this group and left the others.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE *****.....
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE *****.....
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE *****.....
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
...... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
philosophy than their own.
But this is a Jeep discussion board ... so your posting is really out
of place. BTW - my Jeep hesitates when turning to the left but not
to the right - damn good Jeep.
;-)
In article <OkaHd.43060$w62.782@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
attnews < allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> ***** adhered to a far-right, conservative philosophy. so, saying "nice
> ****" is analogous to saying, "nice conservative republican" - surely, a
> conflict in terms..or so it woud seem ? ?
> "Lee Ayrton" <layrton@panix.com> wrote in message
> news:Pine.NEB.4.61.0501180806120.24382@panix1.pani x.com...
> > (Groups trimmed, dammit.)
> >
> > Nice trolls would not have attempted to overrun all of Usenet, and drag
> > entire newsgroups into their onanist/fletching empire.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > > Nice ***** would not have attempted to overrun all of Europe, and drag
> the
> > > entire continent into a socialist/facist empire.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Gactimus" <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in message
> > > news:PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
> > >> Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
> > >> ***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
> > >> have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
> > >> in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
> > >> not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > "I defer to your plainly more vivid memories of topless women with
> > whips....r"
> > R. H. Draney recalls AFU in the Good Old Days.
> >
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
"Mel" <mel@atj.***.com> wrote in message
news:einou091fseg2c4a7kn2fvapn4gu4nf0ua@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:12:47 GMT, Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in
> message <PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:
>>Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
>>***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
>>have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
>>in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
>>not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
>
> no more **** threads in atj.
you started it *** boy.
Female to Male Translation
What a woman says:
"This place is a mess! C'mon,
you and I need to clean up,
Your stuff is lying on the floor
and you'll have no clothes to wear,
if we don't do laundry right now!?"
What a man hears:
blah, blah, blah, blah, C'MON
blah, blah, blah, blah, YOU AND I
blah, blah, blah, blah, ON THE FLOOR
blah, blah, blah, blah, NO CLOTHES
blah, blah, blah, blah, RIGHT NOW
>
> --
> smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
> Mel the Defiler
> member, ATJ regs
> webmaster of atjfag.com
> http://www.atjfag.com/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
"Mel" <mel@atj.***.com> wrote in message
news:einou091fseg2c4a7kn2fvapn4gu4nf0ua@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:12:47 GMT, Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in
> message <PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:
>>Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
>>***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
>>have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
>>in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
>>not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
>
> no more **** threads in atj.
you started it *** boy.
Female to Male Translation
What a woman says:
"This place is a mess! C'mon,
you and I need to clean up,
Your stuff is lying on the floor
and you'll have no clothes to wear,
if we don't do laundry right now!?"
What a man hears:
blah, blah, blah, blah, C'MON
blah, blah, blah, blah, YOU AND I
blah, blah, blah, blah, ON THE FLOOR
blah, blah, blah, blah, NO CLOTHES
blah, blah, blah, blah, RIGHT NOW
>
> --
> smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
> Mel the Defiler
> member, ATJ regs
> webmaster of atjfag.com
> http://www.atjfag.com/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
"Mel" <mel@atj.***.com> wrote in message
news:einou091fseg2c4a7kn2fvapn4gu4nf0ua@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:12:47 GMT, Gactimus <gactimus@xrs.net> wrote in
> message <PDXGd.29026$Xs6.2854@twister.nyroc.rr.com>:
>>Nice ***** could have got the Jews to help them with the bomb. Nice
>>***** would have got far more Russian collaborators and perhaps not
>>have inspired the stubborn resistance of the Russians and the British
>>in WWII. "Nice" might have made the difference. And while they would
>>not have won they would have concluded a beneficial peace treaty.
>
> no more **** threads in atj.
you started it *** boy.
Female to Male Translation
What a woman says:
"This place is a mess! C'mon,
you and I need to clean up,
Your stuff is lying on the floor
and you'll have no clothes to wear,
if we don't do laundry right now!?"
What a man hears:
blah, blah, blah, blah, C'MON
blah, blah, blah, blah, YOU AND I
blah, blah, blah, blah, ON THE FLOOR
blah, blah, blah, blah, NO CLOTHES
blah, blah, blah, blah, RIGHT NOW
>
> --
> smash yer modem, reboot, kill yerself
> Mel the Defiler
> member, ATJ regs
> webmaster of atjfag.com
> http://www.atjfag.com/
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
"Rich Hampel" <RhmpL33@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:180120051548275324%RhmpL33@nospam.net...
> Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE *****.....
> Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
> ..... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
> left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
> philosophy than their own.
Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the
left or right depends on the philosophy. ****-style Fascism is for the most
part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the
most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from
the same political gamebook, however.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What if the ***** were nice?
"Rich Hampel" <RhmpL33@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:180120051548275324%RhmpL33@nospam.net...
> Your first premise is WRONG. Many of my relatives WERE *****.....
> Nazism was a complete totalitarian system of total governmental control
> ..... so therefore by todays definition '*****' would be closer to far
> left progressive liberals who seem to tolerate absolutely no other
> philosophy than their own.
Intolerance is found on both sides of the aisle. Whether it comes from the
left or right depends on the philosophy. ****-style Fascism is for the most
part a conservative philosophy, as opposed to Communism, which is for the
most part a liberal philosophy. Historically, both philosphies played from
the same political gamebook, however.