Weber or Motorcraft for 258
05-31-2005, 02:43 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
05-31-2005, 02:43 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
05-31-2005, 02:43 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
05-31-2005, 02:43 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?
05-31-2005, 03:08 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
05-31-2005, 03:08 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
05-31-2005, 03:08 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
05-31-2005, 03:08 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/