Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums (https://www.jeepscanada.com/)
-   Jeep Mailing List (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/)
-   -   Weber or Motorcraft for 258 (https://www.jeepscanada.com/jeep-mailing-list-32/weber-motorcraft-258-a-28306/)

Steve Foley 05-31-2005 02:06 PM

Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
Weber.

Both camps say theirs is better than the other.

Any opinions?



L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 02:43 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
no venturi vacuum.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Steve Foley wrote:
>
> I'm finally replacing my Carter BBD. Everything I've read from people doing
> a Motorcraft 2100 swap say the same thing as the people who've gone with
> Weber.
>
> Both camps say theirs is better than the other.
>
> Any opinions?


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III 05-31-2005 03:08 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
It is a trouble free carburetor, though still being used on my '78
Bronco: http://www.----------.com/fordFuelFilter.jpg with only one kit
needed after ARCO's ten percent alcohol mix eat it's needle valve seat.
And easily passes Kalifornia SMOG tests, with three hundred and fifty
thousand miles: http://www.----------.com/smog.jpg

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> First I've heard of the old '57 Ford carburetor:
> http://www.advanceautoparts.com/engl...020301cr.html#
> being used, but then anything's better than the SMOGed Carter BBD with
> that cancerous growth on the side. I wouldn't compare it to a Weber,
> though it's capable of holding a fifteen to one atomized mix with almost
> no venturi vacuum.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


calcerise@hotmail.com 05-31-2005 09:28 PM

Re: Weber or Motorcraft for 258
 
Any company that sells fuel system parts that aren't alcohol proof
should be horsewipped. Alcohol, right or wrong, is here to stay.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.06219 seconds with 5 queries