Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
03-05-2004, 08:47 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
>I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
03-05-2004, 08:47 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
>I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
03-05-2004, 08:47 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
>I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>seats and all the bells.
>
>1 Are they reliable?
Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which are
a much newer model.
>
>3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are common
enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather than
dealers.
>
>4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do much
>off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do / did.
As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual. The
Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
have worked on if something does go wrong.
I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level Grand
Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse. My
Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes, but
really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
03-05-2004, 08:32 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
Monte: I was just up to your City on Monday and bought a 1995Jeep Cherokee
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
03-05-2004, 08:32 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
Monte: I was just up to your City on Monday and bought a 1995Jeep Cherokee
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
03-05-2004, 08:32 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
Monte: I was just up to your City on Monday and bought a 1995Jeep Cherokee
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
know him?????
--
Jimmie: VP. North Iowa Off-Road Club
"Monte Castleman" <qmdcastleman@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Qx%1c.33647$hm4.21115@newsread3.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> >I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> >seats and all the bells.
> >
> >1 Are they reliable?
>
> Cherokees are viewed as reliable since they were around long enough to get
> the bugs worked out. There's mixed experiences on Grand Cherokees, which
are
> a much newer model.
> >
> >3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
> Not in my opinion. As a genereal rule, truck parts are more expensive than
> car parts, but domestic parts are cheaper than imported. Cherokees are
common
> enough that you can get a lot of the parts from auto parts stores rather
than
> dealers.
> >
> >4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> >off roading, just heavy snow driving.
> >
> Neither transmission has obvious flaws like the Ford Explorer ones do /
did.
> As you've probably guessed, the automatic is more common than the manual.
The
> Cherokee automatic is viewed as very reliable, but it is very expensive to
> have worked on if something does go wrong.
>
> I should add that the Cherokee wasn't really considered "luxury" by most
> people. I think in later years Jeep considered it more an entry level
Grand
> Cherokee, and buyers considered it either that or a no-frills workhorse.
My
> Cherokee has just about every option except leather and antilock brakes,
but
> really loaded ones are not as common, as most people that wanted and could
> afford all the toys probably bought Grands.
>
> --
> Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
> Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>
03-06-2004, 09:53 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
I have a 2000 Grand Cherokee for sale with 50K miles bought new...
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
03-06-2004, 09:53 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
I have a 2000 Grand Cherokee for sale with 50K miles bought new...
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
03-06-2004, 09:53 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
I have a 2000 Grand Cherokee for sale with 50K miles bought new...
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
immaculate shape
jsprauer @ sbcglobal.net
"Philip" <pescott@roadrunner.nf.net> wrote in message
news:c28jml$9bp$1@nntp-stjh-01-01.rogers.nf.net...
> I am looking at buying a 3 year old, high end Jeep product with leather
> seats and all the bells.
>
> 1 Are they reliable?
>
> 2 How much would I expect to pay in Canada?
>
> 3 Are they more expensive to maintain than comparable luxury SUVs?
>
> 4 Is automatic better than standard in terms of reliability. I don't do
much
> off roading, just heavy snow driving.
>
> Thanks
>
>
03-06-2004, 01:13 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Want to buy a 3 year old Cherokee, what do you think?
>Monte: I was just up to your City on Monday and bought a 1995Jeep Cherokee
>Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
>31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
>was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
>know him?????
Sounds like what you got is similar to mine. Mine is a 93 Country, metallic
green with "champagne" trim (I always thought it looked more like "silver").
It's pretty much stock, except for very slightly oversized (235R15) tires and
aftermarket CD receiver. It does have limited slip and factory skid plates.
When I bought it it there was some rust and "deferred maintenance", but it's
in good shape now.
I don't happen to know Shane Burgen. I would like to try off-roading some
time, but I've only had a 4*4 for 9 months and more pressing issues came up
last summer. So I don't really know anyone in the Jeep "community" around
here.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>
>Country Loaded And in really Great shape. It has a 3" skyjacker lift,
>31:10.50= 15's, fully loaded Green and Gold . One heck of a nice unit. It
>was shane Burgen's I think was his name. He live's in Burnsville. You might
>know him?????
Sounds like what you got is similar to mine. Mine is a 93 Country, metallic
green with "champagne" trim (I always thought it looked more like "silver").
It's pretty much stock, except for very slightly oversized (235R15) tires and
aftermarket CD receiver. It does have limited slip and factory skid plates.
When I bought it it there was some rust and "deferred maintenance", but it's
in good shape now.
I don't happen to know Shane Burgen. I would like to try off-roading some
time, but I've only had a 4*4 for 9 months and more pressing issues came up
last summer. So I don't really know anyone in the Jeep "community" around
here.
--
Monte Castleman, <<Spamfilter in Use>>
Bloomington, MN <<to email, remove the "q" from address>>