Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
In article <yeKdneeSbN02advcRVn-rw@magma.ca>,
FrankW <fworm@mxznorpak.ca> wrote:
> In other groups this has been a hot topic.
> It seems some purists demand bottom posting,
> to adhere to the netiquett rules.
> Myself I prefer top posting. In my opinion
> it seems to make more sense than bottom posting
> Why should I scroll down to reread something I've already read
> to get to the answere / followup.
> Cheers
> Frank
>
> Mike Romain wrote:
> > Not in this group.
> >
> > Mostly we top post here, but sometimes a thread will last if short
> > enough for a bottom post.
> >
> > All the commercial newsreaders default to top posting these days and
> > some of these threads get so long scrolling down means opening up page
> > after page. Times have changed since the BB days...
> >
> > Mike
> > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> >
> > RJ wrote:
> >
> >>L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> And selling Jeep to our enemies was smarter?
> >>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> >>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >>>
> >>>RJ wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> >>>>same sentence.
> >>
> >>AMC was the enemy of good engineering.
> >>
> >>By the way, top posting screws up the continuity of the conversation.
>
--
o_o_o_o
/| ,[_____],
|¯¯¯L --O|||||||O-
()_)¯()_) ¯¯¯¯¯ )_)
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
Common theme for trolls, and I'll bet most don't the reason why we
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
Common theme for trolls, and I'll bet most don't the reason why we
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
Common theme for trolls, and I'll bet most don't the reason why we
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
were forced to just add our comments to the last lines of a Bulletin
Board Service. Nor seen the program we used:
http://www.----------.com/procomm.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
aGraham wrote:
>
> didn't we just go through this a few weeks ago?????
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
the '89 grand wagoneer was the 1962 Kaiser design, and a good one it was. I
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
the '89 grand wagoneer was the 1962 Kaiser design, and a good one it was. I
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
the '89 grand wagoneer was the 1962 Kaiser design, and a good one it was. I
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
always admired AMC for keeping the styling as it was, and not messing it up
with so-called updates and screwing around. I had a '78 cherokee chief
;with amc's 401 4-bbl and when I sold it not so long ago, it had absolutely
no rust and was like new inside and out. (yes, it had been on many offroad
adventures..) AMC galvanlized lower body panels, something krysler quit, in
order to save a couple of bucks. I see many G.C.'s running around my area
with the sills (rocker panels) rotted out. duh...
"Brad and Julie Vaughn" <jfalken@socket.net> wrote in message
news:f39e5035.0409131858.3545d7fb@posting.google.c om...
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:<39o1d.44$0J2.617593@news-text.cableinet.net>...
> > Really ? my wagoneer reminds me of a caddy - luxurious with vague
handling !
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
> >
> > "attnews" <john .n. allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:N2o1d.360392$OB3.117325@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > NOthing could be more insulting to a real jeep than to say it is like
a
> > caddy !!!!!!
>
> Actually, I have an 89 Grand Wagoneer. It is rusting out down near
> the tank, so it is giving it's life(well its front doors and interior
> pieces) for my J10. But that said, it has character - I'm one of the
> few that liked the wood paneling on the side - and is fairly rugged.
> The 04 Grand Cherokee feels a little too plastic for my taste. I
> loved my 02 Sport, but never having owned a CJ, my most rugged jeep
> has been that J10. It is rusty as hell, but it is built like a tank
> and the 360 in it kicks a$$. I have had to fix a seal in the
> quadratrac, but otherwise, it has performed really well. It just
> looks like the wrath of God hit it. I used to drive an M715(probably
> tougher than my J10, but almost undrivable because of the gears) for a
> termite company my dad ran, so my wife thinks I need to get a little
> Cherokee and a CJ so I can say I have had all the major jeep models!
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Wait for 05 TJ or get an 04? Any Advice?
i'm stunned that someone so easily stunned knows the word
jugstuhposishun..or whatever.....
"RJ" <re_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1gk2f9n.1atzqty185a8b5N%re_johnson@hotmail.co m...
> attnews <john.n.allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Them dummies have dumbed-down
> > AMC's brilliant and unique design
>
> I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> same sentence.
>
jugstuhposishun..or whatever.....
"RJ" <re_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1gk2f9n.1atzqty185a8b5N%re_johnson@hotmail.co m...
> attnews <john.n.allen@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> > Them dummies have dumbed-down
> > AMC's brilliant and unique design
>
> I'm just stunned at the juxstaposition of "brilliant" and "AMC" in the
> same sentence.
>