Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/16/2007 10:32 PM, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone > takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nope, my Wrangler is a '93, and like all light trucks in the US, the CHMSL wasn't implemented in Wranglers until '94. > "Garth Almgren" <nospam@mukyj.com> wrote in message > news:5g2qu4F3e9u76U1@mid.individual.net... >> So, I just picked up a cheap hitch cover with LED brake light built in >> that plugs into the trailer wiring connector. Problem is, it only taps >> the green lead, so the light behaves exactly like the right brake/turn >> light and blinks when I'm signaling right. >> >> My goals are as follows: >> 1) Have the hitch light be on when the brakes are on. >> 2) Have the hitch light NOT blink when either turn signal is on. >> 3) Not damage my Jeep's electrical system in any way. >> >> The question is this: Can I use an isolating diode (like the Roadmaster >> Hy-Power) to connect both the left (yellow) and right (green) feeds >> together and use that as an input for the LED array? >> >> My thinking is that when the brakes are on, I've got #1 covered, since >> both inputs to the diode are giving a solid 12v. When one turn signal or >> the other is on, the light will still be getting a solid 12v from >> whichever light isn't blinking, taking care of #2. I'm still good on #3 >> as well, since the diode would protect the left and right circuits from >> interfering with each other. >> >> I think I've got this right and was just going to start experimenting, >> but first I wanted someone with more electronics experience to check my >> thinking so I wouldn't accidentally miss goal #3. :) >> >> >> -- >> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 >> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > > -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/16/2007 10:32 PM, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone > takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nope, my Wrangler is a '93, and like all light trucks in the US, the CHMSL wasn't implemented in Wranglers until '94. > "Garth Almgren" <nospam@mukyj.com> wrote in message > news:5g2qu4F3e9u76U1@mid.individual.net... >> So, I just picked up a cheap hitch cover with LED brake light built in >> that plugs into the trailer wiring connector. Problem is, it only taps >> the green lead, so the light behaves exactly like the right brake/turn >> light and blinks when I'm signaling right. >> >> My goals are as follows: >> 1) Have the hitch light be on when the brakes are on. >> 2) Have the hitch light NOT blink when either turn signal is on. >> 3) Not damage my Jeep's electrical system in any way. >> >> The question is this: Can I use an isolating diode (like the Roadmaster >> Hy-Power) to connect both the left (yellow) and right (green) feeds >> together and use that as an input for the LED array? >> >> My thinking is that when the brakes are on, I've got #1 covered, since >> both inputs to the diode are giving a solid 12v. When one turn signal or >> the other is on, the light will still be getting a solid 12v from >> whichever light isn't blinking, taking care of #2. I'm still good on #3 >> as well, since the diode would protect the left and right circuits from >> interfering with each other. >> >> I think I've got this right and was just going to start experimenting, >> but first I wanted someone with more electronics experience to check my >> thinking so I wouldn't accidentally miss goal #3. :) >> >> >> -- >> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 >> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > > -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/16/2007 10:32 PM, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone > takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nope, my Wrangler is a '93, and like all light trucks in the US, the CHMSL wasn't implemented in Wranglers until '94. > "Garth Almgren" <nospam@mukyj.com> wrote in message > news:5g2qu4F3e9u76U1@mid.individual.net... >> So, I just picked up a cheap hitch cover with LED brake light built in >> that plugs into the trailer wiring connector. Problem is, it only taps >> the green lead, so the light behaves exactly like the right brake/turn >> light and blinks when I'm signaling right. >> >> My goals are as follows: >> 1) Have the hitch light be on when the brakes are on. >> 2) Have the hitch light NOT blink when either turn signal is on. >> 3) Not damage my Jeep's electrical system in any way. >> >> The question is this: Can I use an isolating diode (like the Roadmaster >> Hy-Power) to connect both the left (yellow) and right (green) feeds >> together and use that as an input for the LED array? >> >> My thinking is that when the brakes are on, I've got #1 covered, since >> both inputs to the diode are giving a solid 12v. When one turn signal or >> the other is on, the light will still be getting a solid 12v from >> whichever light isn't blinking, taking care of #2. I'm still good on #3 >> as well, since the diode would protect the left and right circuits from >> interfering with each other. >> >> I think I've got this right and was just going to start experimenting, >> but first I wanted someone with more electronics experience to check my >> thinking so I wouldn't accidentally miss goal #3. :) >> >> >> -- >> ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 >> { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" > > > -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/18/2007 3:05 AM, Old Crow wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:32:37 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > <LWBill------@------.net> wrote: > >> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone >> takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > > Well I wish someone would throw one my way. I wanna put it back*on* > my Jeep. The previous owner thought it looked better without it, I > guess. While European automotive lighting standards are for the most part miles ahead of our FMVSS, the CHMSL is one American invention that really was and is a good idea. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/18/2007 3:05 AM, Old Crow wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:32:37 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > <LWBill------@------.net> wrote: > >> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone >> takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > > Well I wish someone would throw one my way. I wanna put it back*on* > my Jeep. The previous owner thought it looked better without it, I > guess. While European automotive lighting standards are for the most part miles ahead of our FMVSS, the CHMSL is one American invention that really was and is a good idea. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/18/2007 3:05 AM, Old Crow wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:32:37 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > <LWBill------@------.net> wrote: > >> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone >> takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > > Well I wish someone would throw one my way. I wanna put it back*on* > my Jeep. The previous owner thought it looked better without it, I > guess. While European automotive lighting standards are for the most part miles ahead of our FMVSS, the CHMSL is one American invention that really was and is a good idea. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Around 7/18/2007 3:05 AM, Old Crow wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 22:32:37 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" > <LWBill------@------.net> wrote: > >> Don't you have a wire leading to that Mexican third light, that everyone >> takes off and throws away? http://www.4x4xplor.com/images/LoD/LoD-12.jpg > > Well I wish someone would throw one my way. I wanna put it back*on* > my Jeep. The previous owner thought it looked better without it, I > guess. While European automotive lighting standards are for the most part miles ahead of our FMVSS, the CHMSL is one American invention that really was and is a good idea. -- ~/Garth - 1993 Wrangler S 2.5 { }|||||||{ } "MukYJ" |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Mike Romain wrote:
> 'My' Jeep, which is like his 'Wrangler' only has 'one' bulb and 'one' > filament for brakes and signals which requires a logic circuit to > separate/consolidate the signals. > > You seem to be 'full' of good advice (not). Your ass seems to be full of Bill ------' chunky cockspooge. |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Mike Romain wrote:
> 'My' Jeep, which is like his 'Wrangler' only has 'one' bulb and 'one' > filament for brakes and signals which requires a logic circuit to > separate/consolidate the signals. > > You seem to be 'full' of good advice (not). Your ass seems to be full of Bill ------' chunky cockspooge. |
Re: Trailer wiring question
Mike Romain wrote:
> 'My' Jeep, which is like his 'Wrangler' only has 'one' bulb and 'one' > filament for brakes and signals which requires a logic circuit to > separate/consolidate the signals. > > You seem to be 'full' of good advice (not). Your ass seems to be full of Bill ------' chunky cockspooge. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands