Trail(er) trash
06-01-2006, 10:06 PM
#111
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
06-01-2006, 10:06 PM
#112
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
things they were they WERE socialists.
A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
I'm not politically correct!
Jeff DeWitt
Mary Malmros wrote:
> Jeff DeWitt <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in news:0kKfg.11712$Qg.4920
> @tornado.southeast.rr.com:
>
>
>>The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>>hardly far right!
>
>
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
06-01-2006, 10:13 PM
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
06-01-2006, 10:13 PM
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
06-01-2006, 10:13 PM
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
>> The ****'s were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
>> hardly far right!
>
> Ah, another "student of history". The ***** were a fascist organization.
> You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of
> the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples
> Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used
> in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary.
> :-)
> Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting.
>
>
> --
> FRH
I think what Jeff was doing was comparing these "environmentalists" to the
****'s, who were yet another group trying to force their agenda on everyone
else. It's okay to have an opinion, but to force it on someone else is the
crime.
Maybe his comparison was off a little, but the spirit of what he said was
right, and he didn't deserve the personal attacks either.
Spdloader
06-01-2006, 10:14 PM
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
LOL These bleeding heart liberal wacko limp democrats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
06-01-2006, 10:14 PM
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
LOL These bleeding heart liberal wacko limp democrats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
06-01-2006, 10:14 PM
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
LOL These bleeding heart liberal wacko limp democrats:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>
> Oh boy are we getting way off topic however...
>
> I don't claim to be an expert on the *****, but among other unsavory
> things they were they WERE socialists.
>
> A few points, ****'s promoted the limiting of profits, abolishment of
> rent and increasing social benefits, all socialist ideas.
>
> There is an excellent essay from Nobel Prize winner Friedrich A. Hayek
> titled "The Socialist Roots of Nazism"
>
> http://lamar.colostate.edu/~grjan/hayeknaziism.html
>
> I suspect that the reason that it's commonly accepted that Nazism isn't
> really socialism is because the Socialists are (correctly) terrified to
> be connected with Nazism in any way and react very strongly to any
> suggestion that Nazism was socialist.
>
> In other words it's not politically correct to link the two... but then
> I'm not politically correct!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
06-01-2006, 10:18 PM
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
It was on Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:14:21 +0000, another Dirty Dusty Delta day,
when Mary Malmros coughed up:
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Methinks you're in the wrong group for spouting anything like truth,
reality or anything that requires a certain level of education and ability
to indulge in critical thinking. There are exceptions here of course, but
they stand out beacon-like just as Nancy ------ stands out as a William
Dudley Pelley fan, troglodyte and and brownshirt wannabe.
Just an opinion, of course.
--
There is nothing so agonizing to the fine skin of vanity as the application
of a rough truth.
-Edward Bulwer-Lytton, writer (1803-1873)
when Mary Malmros coughed up:
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Methinks you're in the wrong group for spouting anything like truth,
reality or anything that requires a certain level of education and ability
to indulge in critical thinking. There are exceptions here of course, but
they stand out beacon-like just as Nancy ------ stands out as a William
Dudley Pelley fan, troglodyte and and brownshirt wannabe.
Just an opinion, of course.
--
There is nothing so agonizing to the fine skin of vanity as the application
of a rough truth.
-Edward Bulwer-Lytton, writer (1803-1873)
06-01-2006, 10:18 PM
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature *****
It was on Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:14:21 +0000, another Dirty Dusty Delta day,
when Mary Malmros coughed up:
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Methinks you're in the wrong group for spouting anything like truth,
reality or anything that requires a certain level of education and ability
to indulge in critical thinking. There are exceptions here of course, but
they stand out beacon-like just as Nancy ------ stands out as a William
Dudley Pelley fan, troglodyte and and brownshirt wannabe.
Just an opinion, of course.
--
There is nothing so agonizing to the fine skin of vanity as the application
of a rough truth.
-Edward Bulwer-Lytton, writer (1803-1873)
when Mary Malmros coughed up:
> Right is as right does, Jeff; learn your history. The ***** were not in
> the least socialist, no matter what their name says; in fact, socialists
> and other leftists were very much a persecuted group under the **** regime.
Methinks you're in the wrong group for spouting anything like truth,
reality or anything that requires a certain level of education and ability
to indulge in critical thinking. There are exceptions here of course, but
they stand out beacon-like just as Nancy ------ stands out as a William
Dudley Pelley fan, troglodyte and and brownshirt wannabe.
Just an opinion, of course.
--
There is nothing so agonizing to the fine skin of vanity as the application
of a rough truth.
-Edward Bulwer-Lytton, writer (1803-1873)