Re: tow vehicle suggestions
make that 5000lbs :-)
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message news:blelll$bdjd0$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de... > Josh, > I think you are confusing "tow" with "pull". Many vehicles can certainly > PULL well above their rated limits but can't safely TOW that load. I could > PULL 500lbs with my CJ but would I want to TOW that load down a steep hill? > Or ease that load down a boat ramp? No thanks! > > "Joshua Nelson" <spam_box@ev1.net> wrote in message > news:b102b6e4.0309291324.2423944f@posting.google.c om... > > Take manufacturer recommendations with a grain of salt. Remember they > > are writing that owner's manual with a battalion of liability lawyers > > looking over their shoulders. If the vehicle can safely tow 6,000 > > lbs, they probably divide by 3 and put "don't tow more than 2,000 lbs" > > in the manual to cover their butts. > > > > There is no way that towing is such a one size fits all business. If > > you're towing on flat ground and have an 8-cylinder engine and heavy > > duty transmission, and keep it under 55mph, there is no reason a > > cherokee can't tow 5,000 pounds or possibly much more. However if you > > want to drive at max speed and haul something over the continental > > divide that is another matter entirely... so scale your expectations > > accordingly. > > |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
It doesn't make a lot of sense to me either.
I mean a 3000 lb towing difference just with an automatic? Man that is one major jump, well over double. Maybe the auto has different brakes too? Mike Will Honea wrote: > > I can see some merit in the second and I can certainly agree that > practicality dictates the first, but I could never figure out and real > mechanical reason for a hard limit difference even if the real-world > usefullness of a higher limit with the manual is obvious. The GVWR > doesn't change with the tranny type, just the towing. > > Maybe it's that we are misreading a Manf. recommendation or drive > train rating for a vehicle limit. Dunno. > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:16:01 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > > > I am guessing the clutch and 1st gear vs a torque converter figure in > > there. > > > > I am also guessing the auto tranny shifts the weight ratio toward the > > rear wheels more than a standard because of its heavier weight and > > longer length giving the rear wheels slightly more traction or better > > said I guess, slightly more resistance to being pushed out sideways. > > > > Just guesses.... > > > > Mike > > > > Will Honea wrote: > > > > > > While not germaine to the original question, do you have any idea WHY > > > the tow rating is degraded with the manual tranny? Same engine, same > > > brakes, same running gear, but 3000# lower towing limit. I could > > > never figure that one out. The MJ with the heavy duty package was > > > rated 7000# and the only difference was a D44 rearend and (probably) > > > larger brakes. As a practical matter, towing with a 5-spd makes for > > > an interesting clutch manipulation breaking free a heavy load but why > > > the difference in ratings limit? > > > > > > BTW, with a decent hitch and pintle hookup I had no problems pulling > > > 4-5 ton hay trailers all over the farm last summer but that was > > > usually 4-LO and maybe 5mph max <g>. Not dumb enough (yet) to try > > > that on pavement. > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:25:57 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Just a thought. > > > > > > > > The Cherokee automatic is rated for 5000 lb towing, the 5 speed is only > > > > rated for the 2000 lb according to my Cherokee owners manual. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > > > > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > > > > > > > > "E.L. Lambert" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > i am in the market for a vehicle that will see dual use as a daily > > > > > driver (40 freeway miles per day) and also for towing my jeep to the > > > > > trail. > > > > > > > > > > i am trying to decide what kind of vehicle to get and i would like to > > > > > hear what others have to say on this. i need more a people hauler and > > > > > not a work vehicle so i have ruled out large pickups such as the > > > > > f-250. i also don't want to break the bank so i have ruled out high > > > > > end SUVs such as the hummer and escalade. > > > > > > > > > > that leaves two options: 1. midsize SUVs such as the GMC Jimmy (sorry > > > > > cherokee fans - DCs website says you can only tow 2000 pounds, and i > > > > > figure a loaded trail jeep + full trailer is at least 5 or 6 thousand > > > > > pounds, which the jimmy can manage, just barely) or 2. heavy sedans > > > > > such as the cadillac seville, lincoln towncar, or mercedes e500. > > > > > > > > > > anyone want to share their experiences with tow vehicles? > > > > > > -- > > > Will Honea > > -- > Will Honea |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
It doesn't make a lot of sense to me either.
I mean a 3000 lb towing difference just with an automatic? Man that is one major jump, well over double. Maybe the auto has different brakes too? Mike Will Honea wrote: > > I can see some merit in the second and I can certainly agree that > practicality dictates the first, but I could never figure out and real > mechanical reason for a hard limit difference even if the real-world > usefullness of a higher limit with the manual is obvious. The GVWR > doesn't change with the tranny type, just the towing. > > Maybe it's that we are misreading a Manf. recommendation or drive > train rating for a vehicle limit. Dunno. > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:16:01 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > wrote: > > > I am guessing the clutch and 1st gear vs a torque converter figure in > > there. > > > > I am also guessing the auto tranny shifts the weight ratio toward the > > rear wheels more than a standard because of its heavier weight and > > longer length giving the rear wheels slightly more traction or better > > said I guess, slightly more resistance to being pushed out sideways. > > > > Just guesses.... > > > > Mike > > > > Will Honea wrote: > > > > > > While not germaine to the original question, do you have any idea WHY > > > the tow rating is degraded with the manual tranny? Same engine, same > > > brakes, same running gear, but 3000# lower towing limit. I could > > > never figure that one out. The MJ with the heavy duty package was > > > rated 7000# and the only difference was a D44 rearend and (probably) > > > larger brakes. As a practical matter, towing with a 5-spd makes for > > > an interesting clutch manipulation breaking free a heavy load but why > > > the difference in ratings limit? > > > > > > BTW, with a decent hitch and pintle hookup I had no problems pulling > > > 4-5 ton hay trailers all over the farm last summer but that was > > > usually 4-LO and maybe 5mph max <g>. Not dumb enough (yet) to try > > > that on pavement. > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:25:57 UTC Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Just a thought. > > > > > > > > The Cherokee automatic is rated for 5000 lb towing, the 5 speed is only > > > > rated for the 2000 lb according to my Cherokee owners manual. > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > > > > 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > > > > > > > > "E.L. Lambert" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > i am in the market for a vehicle that will see dual use as a daily > > > > > driver (40 freeway miles per day) and also for towing my jeep to the > > > > > trail. > > > > > > > > > > i am trying to decide what kind of vehicle to get and i would like to > > > > > hear what others have to say on this. i need more a people hauler and > > > > > not a work vehicle so i have ruled out large pickups such as the > > > > > f-250. i also don't want to break the bank so i have ruled out high > > > > > end SUVs such as the hummer and escalade. > > > > > > > > > > that leaves two options: 1. midsize SUVs such as the GMC Jimmy (sorry > > > > > cherokee fans - DCs website says you can only tow 2000 pounds, and i > > > > > figure a loaded trail jeep + full trailer is at least 5 or 6 thousand > > > > > pounds, which the jimmy can manage, just barely) or 2. heavy sedans > > > > > such as the cadillac seville, lincoln towncar, or mercedes e500. > > > > > > > > > > anyone want to share their experiences with tow vehicles? > > > > > > -- > > > Will Honea > > -- > Will Honea |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
Many automatic transmission turous have a two to one slip ratio,
essentially doubling the torque. And now many auto manufactures are locking them in an effort to squeeze a little more mileage out of them. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > It doesn't make a lot of sense to me either. > > I mean a 3000 lb towing difference just with an automatic? Man that is > one major jump, well over double. > > Maybe the auto has different brakes too? > > Mike |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
Many automatic transmission turous have a two to one slip ratio,
essentially doubling the torque. And now many auto manufactures are locking them in an effort to squeeze a little more mileage out of them. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Mike Romain wrote: > > It doesn't make a lot of sense to me either. > > I mean a 3000 lb towing difference just with an automatic? Man that is > one major jump, well over double. > > Maybe the auto has different brakes too? > > Mike |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
Bill, I said before I drive an F-250 Super Duty. I do know why it can tow
more than a cherokee. (And actually, it rides pretty damn good for a 3/4 ton truck. Surprised me anyway). One thing I WAS out of the ballpark on was it's towing capacity. I mentioned it before as being 20,000# when in fact that is it's GCWR. Even still, it can haul a load twice it's own weight. I'm just wondering what the actual determining factors are when detroit comes up with their tow ratings. "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:3F7A5C90.1F0F30DD@cox.net... > I think if you ever ride in a 3/4 ton truck you'll realize why > their tow rating is higher, their rear springs are like no spring at > all: http://www.gonecamping.net/stories/tow_ratings.html > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "T. Greening" wrote: > > > > Boy, I'm probably opening myself up here but.... > > > > I don't know, would I? I am not at all familiar with cherokees but this > > whole towing issue has got me to wondering. Wondering what ARE the > > determining factors in the towing equation. I see where Joshua states that > > DC says an auto cherokee can safely tow 5000#. Where does that number come |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
Bill, I said before I drive an F-250 Super Duty. I do know why it can tow
more than a cherokee. (And actually, it rides pretty damn good for a 3/4 ton truck. Surprised me anyway). One thing I WAS out of the ballpark on was it's towing capacity. I mentioned it before as being 20,000# when in fact that is it's GCWR. Even still, it can haul a load twice it's own weight. I'm just wondering what the actual determining factors are when detroit comes up with their tow ratings. "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:3F7A5C90.1F0F30DD@cox.net... > I think if you ever ride in a 3/4 ton truck you'll realize why > their tow rating is higher, their rear springs are like no spring at > all: http://www.gonecamping.net/stories/tow_ratings.html > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "T. Greening" wrote: > > > > Boy, I'm probably opening myself up here but.... > > > > I don't know, would I? I am not at all familiar with cherokees but this > > whole towing issue has got me to wondering. Wondering what ARE the > > determining factors in the towing equation. I see where Joshua states that > > DC says an auto cherokee can safely tow 5000#. Where does that number come |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
I thought the picture was self explanatory. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Joe wrote: > > Bill, I caught a typo: > It's long wheel base make it a pleasure to tow a REAL Jeep |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
I thought the picture was self explanatory. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Joe wrote: > > Bill, I caught a typo: > It's long wheel base make it a pleasure to tow a REAL Jeep |
Re: tow vehicle suggestions
I would say they look to the engineers for their designed
strengths. As a builder of homes look to the blue prints to see what lumber is needed to go up a second story. Your tires are probably eight ply rating running 45-60 pounds, on eight lug rims, with floating bearings, and of course leaf springs. Now compare that to a bouncing coil sprung Dana 35c TJ. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "T. Greening" wrote: > > Bill, I said before I drive an F-250 Super Duty. I do know why it can tow > more than a cherokee. (And actually, it rides pretty damn good for a 3/4 > ton truck. Surprised me anyway). One thing I WAS out of the ballpark on > was it's towing capacity. I mentioned it before as being 20,000# when in > fact that is it's GCWR. Even still, it can haul a load twice it's own > weight. I'm just wondering what the actual determining factors are when > detroit comes up with their tow ratings. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands