TJ towing capacity
07-21-2005, 02:00 AM
#181
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
right?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>
> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it. I
> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
> KH
right?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>
> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it. I
> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
> KH
07-26-2005, 02:27 AM
#182
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
yea, I kept the expedition because I paid for it mysef, the Tahoe was a
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
07-26-2005, 02:27 AM
#183
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
yea, I kept the expedition because I paid for it mysef, the Tahoe was a
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
07-26-2005, 02:27 AM
#184
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
yea, I kept the expedition because I paid for it mysef, the Tahoe was a
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
07-26-2005, 02:27 AM
#185
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
yea, I kept the expedition because I paid for it mysef, the Tahoe was a
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
company vehicle that got handed down to me. When I sold it the company got
the money. I like the ford it just fine, but all vehicles are hard to part
with. :)
KH
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42DF39F4.4628E9A9@***.net...
> But you still have your Expedition, or Excursion to tot your toys,
> right?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Kevin in San Diego wrote:
>>
>> The guy who got my Tahoe is treating it like his new child. He loves it.
>> I
>> kinda miss it. At least I can visit it once in a while lol.
>> KH
07-28-2005, 10:30 AM
#186
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:12 GMT, Will Honea wrote:
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
07-28-2005, 10:30 AM
#187
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:12 GMT, Will Honea wrote:
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
07-28-2005, 10:30 AM
#188
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:12 GMT, Will Honea wrote:
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
07-28-2005, 10:30 AM
#189
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ towing capacity
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:16:12 GMT, Will Honea wrote:
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
> If wheel base is the primary consideration, why were the MJ - even the
> long bed versions, limited to one tow weight with standard
> transmissions and at least double the weight with an aout.
To answer your question here ... the fluid link in an automatic can
handle a high-RPM start whereas the clutch in a manual can't. With a
gas engine you need the high-RPM start because that's where the engine
gets the torque needed to move the weight of the rig. A diesel gets
its torque at lower RPMs, hence a manual there doesn't have the same
problem.
Gearing can affect the rating too. My F-150 has a 2.73 rear end and
doesn't even have a tow capacity listed in the owner's manual. My BII
has 3.73 final ratios and is rated for about double what the 3.08 in
the F-150 would be. Both are 5-speed transmissions.
Come to think of it ... the BII has the same wheelbase as the TJ (+/-
an inch or two) yet was rated to tow around 3700 lbs, IIRC. I
wouldn't be surprised if marketing and liability played a role at
least as significant as physics and engineering in determining the
ratings.
-D
--
The teaching of the wise is a fountain of life,
turning a man from the snares of death.
Proverbs 13:14
www: http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/ jabber: dman@dman13.dyndns.org
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeep videos
Jeep Videos - Pictures
0
03-27-2008 03:27 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)