Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

Dear elitist prigs,

Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.

I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.

If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
Jeep is the reason.

Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

You're welcome!

munchiechee wrote:

> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

You're welcome!

munchiechee wrote:

> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

You're welcome!

munchiechee wrote:

> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

You're welcome!

munchiechee wrote:

> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

So you bought a TJ just to prove a**holes may own one?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

munchiechee wrote:
>
> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

So you bought a TJ just to prove a**holes may own one?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

munchiechee wrote:
>
> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

So you bought a TJ just to prove a**holes may own one?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

munchiechee wrote:
>
> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

So you bought a TJ just to prove a**holes may own one?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

munchiechee wrote:
>
> Dear elitist prigs,
>
> Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
> friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
> to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
> I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
> Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
> Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
> an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
> the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
> If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
> MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
> Jeep is the reason.
>
> Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
> the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
> WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
> crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
> I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
> for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.

Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
 

>From: munchiechee@sbcglobal.net (munchiechee)
>Date: 8/22/04 8:59 PM AST
>Message-id: <cb153bd2.0408221659.17368a9c@posting.google.com >
>
>Dear elitist prigs,
>
>Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a
>friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose
>to make hay out of my being better served by a different car.
>
>I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a
>Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats
>Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with
>an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on
>the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle.
>
>If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better
>MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the
>Jeep is the reason.
>
>Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on
>the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their
>WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a
>crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto -
>I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited"
>for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums.
>
>


Ya know, I don't blame him at all for this response. All he did was ask a
simple question.