Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
I agree with Jerry. I have a built TJ (35" tires) and I get the same as he
mentioned. I am between 2000 and 2800 RPMs' on the highway to keep the engine in it's sweet spot. I run 488 gears. The slower I go on the highway relates to better mileage. I'm planning a trip cross country and I've factored in the fact that I will have to leave a day earlier. Go slower. Andy 2001 TJ "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:8S2Wc.125987$sh.71214@fed1read06... > 12-14 around town and 16 on the freeway is NORMAL for a Wrangler. It's > neither low nor high. My own Wrangler, built, gets right around 12.5 to 13 > mpg all-around driving with obviously a bit more on the highway if I keep my > speed down. The big issue is the Wrangler's barn door aerodynamics which > don't help with fuel economy. Even the Grand Cherokee with the same engine > will get better fuel economy due to it's vastly better aerodynamics. > > The bottom line is that it's a Jeep Wrangler that is built for offroading, > it's not an econo-box or car that has more going for it so far as having > more potential for better economy. Once again... if you can't live with > that fuel economy, it's time to get something else to drive.... Jeeps aren't > for you. > > Jerry > -- > Jerry Bransford > PP-ASEL N6TAY > See the Geezer Jeep at > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:lH2Wc.57830$wo.52540@okepread06... > > munchiechee did pass the time by typing: > > > I have a 97 TJ 4.0/manual thats been great on road and off - the only > > > consistent problem I have with the Jeep is the MPGs, way less than > > > advertised, I'm averaging 12-14 in city and about 16 on freeway. > > > > > > I've checked everything out possible, and even taken it to the > > > stealer; either I have a very heavy foot or I just have a thirsty > > > jeep. > > > > What you would spend on doing this would be much much much much much > > more than what you would save on fuel. As Hesco says, "Speed costs > > money, how fast do you want to go?" > > > > Your 4.0 should be getting better than that. Let's start off with > > the basics. > > > > Plugs, Wires, Rotor, Cap > > > > Clean the IAP http://members.cox.net/wilsond/tb/tb.html > > > > If the plugs show rich (excess carbon) then you should replace > > the O2 sensor. Yes, it can set a code but the O2 sensor will drift > > off long before any codes get set. > > > > Depending on how long you have ran the cat might need replacement. > > > > You should also check your exhaust header for cracks. The 4.0 header > > is notorious for this. You know it's cracked when the engine sounds > > like a diesel or you start getting what sounds like lifter noise. > > > > Switch out to full synthetic if you haven't already, that's good for > > a teeny improvement. > > > > But by and far the best way to reduce fuel use is to take it slow and > > easy. The goal on the highway is to not have to use the brakes. And > > try not to beat folks to a red light. :) I tried driving like that for > > a couple of tanks and it made a 4mpg difference in my city driving. > > (then again my ZJ can gulp fuel) > > > > -- > > -- DougW -- 93 ZJ 4.0 http://members.cox.net/wilsond > > HESCO Supercharger - 300W IASCA Stereo - Edelbrock IAS Shocks > > Gibson Exhaust - rear DCpower - custom gauge install - Stillen Rotors > > Banks Header - and BEER, in the fridge! > > > > > > |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
I agree with Jerry. I have a built TJ (35" tires) and I get the same as he
mentioned. I am between 2000 and 2800 RPMs' on the highway to keep the engine in it's sweet spot. I run 488 gears. The slower I go on the highway relates to better mileage. I'm planning a trip cross country and I've factored in the fact that I will have to leave a day earlier. Go slower. Andy 2001 TJ "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:8S2Wc.125987$sh.71214@fed1read06... > 12-14 around town and 16 on the freeway is NORMAL for a Wrangler. It's > neither low nor high. My own Wrangler, built, gets right around 12.5 to 13 > mpg all-around driving with obviously a bit more on the highway if I keep my > speed down. The big issue is the Wrangler's barn door aerodynamics which > don't help with fuel economy. Even the Grand Cherokee with the same engine > will get better fuel economy due to it's vastly better aerodynamics. > > The bottom line is that it's a Jeep Wrangler that is built for offroading, > it's not an econo-box or car that has more going for it so far as having > more potential for better economy. Once again... if you can't live with > that fuel economy, it's time to get something else to drive.... Jeeps aren't > for you. > > Jerry > -- > Jerry Bransford > PP-ASEL N6TAY > See the Geezer Jeep at > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:lH2Wc.57830$wo.52540@okepread06... > > munchiechee did pass the time by typing: > > > I have a 97 TJ 4.0/manual thats been great on road and off - the only > > > consistent problem I have with the Jeep is the MPGs, way less than > > > advertised, I'm averaging 12-14 in city and about 16 on freeway. > > > > > > I've checked everything out possible, and even taken it to the > > > stealer; either I have a very heavy foot or I just have a thirsty > > > jeep. > > > > What you would spend on doing this would be much much much much much > > more than what you would save on fuel. As Hesco says, "Speed costs > > money, how fast do you want to go?" > > > > Your 4.0 should be getting better than that. Let's start off with > > the basics. > > > > Plugs, Wires, Rotor, Cap > > > > Clean the IAP http://members.cox.net/wilsond/tb/tb.html > > > > If the plugs show rich (excess carbon) then you should replace > > the O2 sensor. Yes, it can set a code but the O2 sensor will drift > > off long before any codes get set. > > > > Depending on how long you have ran the cat might need replacement. > > > > You should also check your exhaust header for cracks. The 4.0 header > > is notorious for this. You know it's cracked when the engine sounds > > like a diesel or you start getting what sounds like lifter noise. > > > > Switch out to full synthetic if you haven't already, that's good for > > a teeny improvement. > > > > But by and far the best way to reduce fuel use is to take it slow and > > easy. The goal on the highway is to not have to use the brakes. And > > try not to beat folks to a red light. :) I tried driving like that for > > a couple of tanks and it made a 4mpg difference in my city driving. > > (then again my ZJ can gulp fuel) > > > > -- > > -- DougW -- 93 ZJ 4.0 http://members.cox.net/wilsond > > HESCO Supercharger - 300W IASCA Stereo - Edelbrock IAS Shocks > > Gibson Exhaust - rear DCpower - custom gauge install - Stillen Rotors > > Banks Header - and BEER, in the fridge! > > > > > > |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
I agree with Jerry. I have a built TJ (35" tires) and I get the same as he
mentioned. I am between 2000 and 2800 RPMs' on the highway to keep the engine in it's sweet spot. I run 488 gears. The slower I go on the highway relates to better mileage. I'm planning a trip cross country and I've factored in the fact that I will have to leave a day earlier. Go slower. Andy 2001 TJ "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message news:8S2Wc.125987$sh.71214@fed1read06... > 12-14 around town and 16 on the freeway is NORMAL for a Wrangler. It's > neither low nor high. My own Wrangler, built, gets right around 12.5 to 13 > mpg all-around driving with obviously a bit more on the highway if I keep my > speed down. The big issue is the Wrangler's barn door aerodynamics which > don't help with fuel economy. Even the Grand Cherokee with the same engine > will get better fuel economy due to it's vastly better aerodynamics. > > The bottom line is that it's a Jeep Wrangler that is built for offroading, > it's not an econo-box or car that has more going for it so far as having > more potential for better economy. Once again... if you can't live with > that fuel economy, it's time to get something else to drive.... Jeeps aren't > for you. > > Jerry > -- > Jerry Bransford > PP-ASEL N6TAY > See the Geezer Jeep at > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message > news:lH2Wc.57830$wo.52540@okepread06... > > munchiechee did pass the time by typing: > > > I have a 97 TJ 4.0/manual thats been great on road and off - the only > > > consistent problem I have with the Jeep is the MPGs, way less than > > > advertised, I'm averaging 12-14 in city and about 16 on freeway. > > > > > > I've checked everything out possible, and even taken it to the > > > stealer; either I have a very heavy foot or I just have a thirsty > > > jeep. > > > > What you would spend on doing this would be much much much much much > > more than what you would save on fuel. As Hesco says, "Speed costs > > money, how fast do you want to go?" > > > > Your 4.0 should be getting better than that. Let's start off with > > the basics. > > > > Plugs, Wires, Rotor, Cap > > > > Clean the IAP http://members.cox.net/wilsond/tb/tb.html > > > > If the plugs show rich (excess carbon) then you should replace > > the O2 sensor. Yes, it can set a code but the O2 sensor will drift > > off long before any codes get set. > > > > Depending on how long you have ran the cat might need replacement. > > > > You should also check your exhaust header for cracks. The 4.0 header > > is notorious for this. You know it's cracked when the engine sounds > > like a diesel or you start getting what sounds like lifter noise. > > > > Switch out to full synthetic if you haven't already, that's good for > > a teeny improvement. > > > > But by and far the best way to reduce fuel use is to take it slow and > > easy. The goal on the highway is to not have to use the brakes. And > > try not to beat folks to a red light. :) I tried driving like that for > > a couple of tanks and it made a 4mpg difference in my city driving. > > (then again my ZJ can gulp fuel) > > > > -- > > -- DougW -- 93 ZJ 4.0 http://members.cox.net/wilsond > > HESCO Supercharger - 300W IASCA Stereo - Edelbrock IAS Shocks > > Gibson Exhaust - rear DCpower - custom gauge install - Stillen Rotors > > Banks Header - and BEER, in the fridge! > > > > > > |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
TROLL!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ munchiechee wrote: ><snip> |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
TROLL!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ munchiechee wrote: ><snip> |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
TROLL!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ munchiechee wrote: ><snip> |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
TROLL!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ munchiechee wrote: ><snip> |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
Dear elitist prigs,
Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose to make hay out of my being better served by a different car. I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle. If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the Jeep is the reason. Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto - I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited" for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums. |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
Dear elitist prigs,
Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose to make hay out of my being better served by a different car. I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle. If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the Jeep is the reason. Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto - I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited" for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums. |
Re: TJ engine swap - 4.0 to something with better MPG?
Dear elitist prigs,
Of course I don't mean to address the posters who replied in a friendly kind of way, but the majority of you stuck up elitists chose to make hay out of my being better served by a different car. I asked if it was possible to drop in a more efficent powertrain on a Jeep because I'm annoyed by low teens in the MPG. If thats whats Jeeps get, well congratulations to all of you for being satisfied with an inefficient auto in 2004- in my opinion the extremely low MPG on the TJ is hilariously low for a modern vehicle. If its an aerodynamics issue than there 4 banger shouldn't get better MPG - period. SO it stands to reason that the aged 6 cylinder in the Jeep is the reason. Of course it is always amusing to watch the self-proclaimed experts on the Jeep board strut around as if anyone who doesn't share their WEALTH of knowledge and insight, and in this case, acceptance of a crappy aspect of a jeep is better suited in a different auto - I'll keep the TJ, thanks - and your opinions of whether I'm "suited" for it or not can keep your collective heads company up your bums. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:49 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands