Thanks for the help... another question
02-29-2004, 12:45 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
"Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> >
> > My FSM says
> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
> >
> > That's for the I-6, 258.
> >
> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
that's
> > up
> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
> >
> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern". I
> > would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
bad, bad things.
Chris
02-29-2004, 12:45 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
"Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> >
> > My FSM says
> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
> >
> > That's for the I-6, 258.
> >
> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
that's
> > up
> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
> >
> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern". I
> > would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
bad, bad things.
Chris
02-29-2004, 12:45 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
"Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> >
> > My FSM says
> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
> >
> > That's for the I-6, 258.
> >
> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
that's
> > up
> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
> >
> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern". I
> > would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
> >
> > Bill
> >
>
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
bad, bad things.
Chris
02-29-2004, 01:11 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
http://members.tripod.com/torquespec...-86_st6eng.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
02-29-2004, 01:11 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
http://members.tripod.com/torquespec...-86_st6eng.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
02-29-2004, 01:11 AM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
http://members.tripod.com/torquespec...-86_st6eng.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Danny Bains wrote:
>
> William Oliveri wrote:
>
> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
02-29-2004, 10:44 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
c wrote:
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
02-29-2004, 10:44 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
c wrote:
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
02-29-2004, 10:44 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
c wrote:
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
>
> "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
>> William Oliveri wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > My FSM says
>> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
>> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
>> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
>> >
>> > That's for the I-6, 258.
>> >
>> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> that's
>> > up
>> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
>> >
>> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
>> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
>> >
>> > Bill
>> >
>>
>>
>> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
>
> Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> bad, bad things.
>
> Chris
Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
--
Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
02-29-2004, 12:11 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Thanks for the help... another question
My FSM Says:
"Main Bearing Capscrews"
Torque = 80 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
Torque = 75 - 80 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
Billo
"Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
news:4YydnZs087R1mN_dRVn-jg@comcast.com...
> c wrote:
>
> >
> > "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> > news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> >> William Oliveri wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > My FSM says
> >> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
> >> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
> >> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
> >> >
> >> > That's for the I-6, 258.
> >> >
> >> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> > that's
> >> > up
> >> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
> >> >
> >> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
> >> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
> >> >
> >> > Bill
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
> >
> > Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> > torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> > bad, bad things.
> >
> > Chris
>
>
> Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
> loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
>
>
"Main Bearing Capscrews"
Torque = 80 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
Torque = 75 - 80 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
Billo
"Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
news:4YydnZs087R1mN_dRVn-jg@comcast.com...
> c wrote:
>
> >
> > "Danny Bains" <lookatme@123.com> wrote in message
> > news:_aKdnTb1hKrT_NzdRVn-uA@comcast.com...
> >> William Oliveri wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > My FSM says
> >> > "Connecting Rod Bolt Nuts"
> >> > Torque = 33 ft lbs for "Service Set-to torque",
> >> > Torque = 30 - 35 ft lbs for "Service In-Use Recheck Torque"
> >> >
> >> > That's for the I-6, 258.
> >> >
> >> > If you're talking about the exterier of the block and oil pan then
> > that's
> >> > up
> >> > to you. I cleaned mine off so I can detect oil leaks in the future.
> >> >
> >> > As far as the oil pan goes, I don't think there's a "torque pattern".
> >> > I would just go from center to outer and from side to side.
> >> >
> >> > Bill
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks Bill. I found this article and it says to use 80 ft pounds.
> >
> > Just to clarify, that is the spec for the main bearings. The rod bearing
> > torque is the 33 that Bill stated. Torquing a rod cap to main specs does
> > bad, bad things.
> >
> > Chris
>
>
> Thanks. To make sure I'm clear, the bolts for the seven main caps I
> loosened to remove the rear main seal need to be torqued to 80 ft pounds?
>
> --
> Say NO! To TCPA! http://www.againsttcpa.com
> What's Microsoft up to: http://www.euronet.nl/users/frankvw/IhateMS.html
>
>