Test - Disregard
08-15-2007, 12:12 AM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
08-15-2007, 12:12 AM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
08-15-2007, 12:12 AM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
>
> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>
>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>> why not just send a post?
> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
In other words, a "test" post.
> Give it a rest.
No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
are not necessary.
--
XS11E, Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
08-15-2007, 12:36 AM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
You guys with this "But there still is no reason to post a test
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
08-15-2007, 12:36 AM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
You guys with this "But there still is no reason to post a test
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
08-15-2007, 12:36 AM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
You guys with this "But there still is no reason to post a test
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
08-15-2007, 12:36 AM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
You guys with this "But there still is no reason to post a test
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
message in violation of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this
group. "
Why do all of you take this so seriously?
This is the Internet after all! For all you know, these people posting
here don't even own a vehicle under the Jeep banner!
So what it boils down to is... In my words... "Who gives a flying ----
at a rolling doughnut!"
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:30:25 -0700, XS11E <xs11e@mailinator.com>
wrote:
>Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
>> Stupendous Man wrote:
>>>>> retard
>>>>
>>>> I'll be charitable and assume you mean to slow down.
>>>>
>>> These "tests" are usually a prelude to NG spamming
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Not from that long time poster....
>
>But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation of
>netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>
>If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here, why not
>just send a post?
08-15-2007, 08:53 AM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
XS11E wrote:
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris
08-15-2007, 08:53 AM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
XS11E wrote:
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris
08-15-2007, 08:53 AM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Test - Disregard
XS11E wrote:
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "XS11E" <xs11e@mailinator.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns998CC66FCFD9Dxs11emailinatorcom@69.28.173. 184...
>>> But there still is no reason to post a test message in violation
>>> of netiquitte and probably the FAQs of this group.
>>>
>>> If Doug Gavilanes wanted to see if his posts were getting here,
>>> why not just send a post?
>
>> He DID "just send a post." The post he sent was <paraphrasing> Is
>> this thing on < tap, tap, tap>?
>
> In other words, a "test" post.
>
>> Give it a rest.
>
> No, too many people here completely disregard netiquette and my score
> file is filling up, I don't need more entries. Test posts are not
> acceptable in groups w/o test in their name and more importantly they
> are not necessary.
>
>
And all of the posts of people bitching about his test post outnumber
the posts made in his test. With all the ---- this group has endured
because of billy boy and his net friends, I fail to see how one simple
little test post is going to make the world crumble. Now I just added
one more port to the test thread. There have been one or two test posts
here that I can remember in recent history, and thousands of posts from
"Bill and friends". If you're going to bitch about something, bitch
about the shitpile Bill has caused, not the one bunny pellet caused from
a test post.
Chris