Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
10-11-2005, 02:48 PM
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Oh, is that a Brit only one ? Bollocking someone is to "bawl them out", give
them a hard time etc.
also can say "give someone a right bollocking" or "bust someone's ***** over
<insert reason>".
We don't use "ballock" as an alternative spelling btw.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:434bfeed$1_2@alt.athenanews.com...
> Precisely how does one use the word "bollock", or possibly "ballock", as a
> verb? Americans want to know.
>
> Earle
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:hfS2f.126911$G8.27007@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Indeed. Also, frivolous lawsuits result in the prosecution lawyer
getting
> > bollocked.
them a hard time etc.
also can say "give someone a right bollocking" or "bust someone's ***** over
<insert reason>".
We don't use "ballock" as an alternative spelling btw.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:434bfeed$1_2@alt.athenanews.com...
> Precisely how does one use the word "bollock", or possibly "ballock", as a
> verb? Americans want to know.
>
> Earle
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:hfS2f.126911$G8.27007@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Indeed. Also, frivolous lawsuits result in the prosecution lawyer
getting
> > bollocked.
10-11-2005, 02:48 PM
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Oh, is that a Brit only one ? Bollocking someone is to "bawl them out", give
them a hard time etc.
also can say "give someone a right bollocking" or "bust someone's ***** over
<insert reason>".
We don't use "ballock" as an alternative spelling btw.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:434bfeed$1_2@alt.athenanews.com...
> Precisely how does one use the word "bollock", or possibly "ballock", as a
> verb? Americans want to know.
>
> Earle
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:hfS2f.126911$G8.27007@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Indeed. Also, frivolous lawsuits result in the prosecution lawyer
getting
> > bollocked.
them a hard time etc.
also can say "give someone a right bollocking" or "bust someone's ***** over
<insert reason>".
We don't use "ballock" as an alternative spelling btw.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Earle Horton" <nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote in message
news:434bfeed$1_2@alt.athenanews.com...
> Precisely how does one use the word "bollock", or possibly "ballock", as a
> verb? Americans want to know.
>
> Earle
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:hfS2f.126911$G8.27007@text.news.blueyonder.co .uk...
> > Indeed. Also, frivolous lawsuits result in the prosecution lawyer
getting
> > bollocked.
10-11-2005, 03:23 PM
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:04:45 +0200, "Earle Horton"
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
10-11-2005, 03:23 PM
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:04:45 +0200, "Earle Horton"
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
10-11-2005, 03:23 PM
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 20:04:45 +0200, "Earle Horton"
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
<nurse-nospam-busters@msn.com> wrote:
>The fact that there are so many lawsuits, is more evidence that people just
>don't get along, than anything else.
Thought I agree with what you have to say for the most part, I have to
disagree with what you said above. The fact that there are so many
lawsuits are not because people don't get along but because it is very
cheap to take someone to court yet can cost the defendant a lot of money
even if he wins.
If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
--
Taylor
'03 Audi S6 Avant
'05 Mazda6 Wagon GT
'98 Jeep Cherokee Sport
10-11-2005, 05:41 PM
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Pretty much. Its actually quite hard to take someone to court for making a
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
10-11-2005, 05:41 PM
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Pretty much. Its actually quite hard to take someone to court for making a
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
10-11-2005, 05:41 PM
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Pretty much. Its actually quite hard to take someone to court for making a
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
noise here ; you have to get the police or council to monitor the noise with
a decibel gauge etc etc.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Just Taylor" <taylor@wilhelp.com> wrote in message
news:435d1099.364523250@wilhelp.com...
> If the loser had to pay the court costs, Mr. Smith wouldn't be wasting
> our court time with Mr. Rogers over the sound of his lawn mower or
> whatever other frivolous lawsuit he files against another.
10-12-2005, 10:44 PM
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Just Taylor proclaimed:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:12:36 GMT, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info>
> wrote:
>
>
>>British libel laws are considered pro-plaintiff, meaning that the defendant
>>must prove that she or he did not commit libel. This is the opposite of
>>American libel law, which places the burden of proof upon the plaintiff to
>>show that the alleged libelous statement contained malice and caused damage.
>>I didn't realise this.
>
>
> One thing that works well for the British though is the loser must pay
> for all the costs... so there is not as much frivolous lawsuits over
> there as there are here. If we could adopt that system many scumbag
> lawyers would be out of business and perhaps our court system would work
> better.
>
Yeah, except that Britain is the first country where some jackass
filed, and won, the world's first newsgroup posting sourced libel
suit. The filer isn't particularly welcome in the country that was
the original subject matter in the postings.
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:12:36 GMT, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info>
> wrote:
>
>
>>British libel laws are considered pro-plaintiff, meaning that the defendant
>>must prove that she or he did not commit libel. This is the opposite of
>>American libel law, which places the burden of proof upon the plaintiff to
>>show that the alleged libelous statement contained malice and caused damage.
>>I didn't realise this.
>
>
> One thing that works well for the British though is the loser must pay
> for all the costs... so there is not as much frivolous lawsuits over
> there as there are here. If we could adopt that system many scumbag
> lawyers would be out of business and perhaps our court system would work
> better.
>
Yeah, except that Britain is the first country where some jackass
filed, and won, the world's first newsgroup posting sourced libel
suit. The filer isn't particularly welcome in the country that was
the original subject matter in the postings.
10-12-2005, 10:44 PM
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stalking ------- "Taylor Jimenez" NAILED as Joe Jared!!
Just Taylor proclaimed:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:12:36 GMT, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info>
> wrote:
>
>
>>British libel laws are considered pro-plaintiff, meaning that the defendant
>>must prove that she or he did not commit libel. This is the opposite of
>>American libel law, which places the burden of proof upon the plaintiff to
>>show that the alleged libelous statement contained malice and caused damage.
>>I didn't realise this.
>
>
> One thing that works well for the British though is the loser must pay
> for all the costs... so there is not as much frivolous lawsuits over
> there as there are here. If we could adopt that system many scumbag
> lawyers would be out of business and perhaps our court system would work
> better.
>
Yeah, except that Britain is the first country where some jackass
filed, and won, the world's first newsgroup posting sourced libel
suit. The filer isn't particularly welcome in the country that was
the original subject matter in the postings.
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2005 08:12:36 GMT, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info>
> wrote:
>
>
>>British libel laws are considered pro-plaintiff, meaning that the defendant
>>must prove that she or he did not commit libel. This is the opposite of
>>American libel law, which places the burden of proof upon the plaintiff to
>>show that the alleged libelous statement contained malice and caused damage.
>>I didn't realise this.
>
>
> One thing that works well for the British though is the loser must pay
> for all the costs... so there is not as much frivolous lawsuits over
> there as there are here. If we could adopt that system many scumbag
> lawyers would be out of business and perhaps our court system would work
> better.
>
Yeah, except that Britain is the first country where some jackass
filed, and won, the world's first newsgroup posting sourced libel
suit. The filer isn't particularly welcome in the country that was
the original subject matter in the postings.
