|
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
Coasty wrote:
> I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
Coasty wrote:
> I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
Coasty wrote:
> I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:NIPZh.84056$2Q1.76036@newsfe16.lga... Coasty wrote: > I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW "Dead Weight" :ŹD Kate |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:NIPZh.84056$2Q1.76036@newsfe16.lga... Coasty wrote: > I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW "Dead Weight" :ŹD Kate |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:NIPZh.84056$2Q1.76036@newsfe16.lga... Coasty wrote: > I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW "Dead Weight" :ŹD Kate |
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:NIPZh.84056$2Q1.76036@newsfe16.lga... Coasty wrote: > I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for > spammers Ok.. If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be? -- DougW "Dead Weight" :ŹD Kate |
Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:52:27 -0600, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
"Earle Horton" <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote: >I have gotten a few Hotmail and Yahoo! mail accounts cancelled, based on >reporting spammers and Nigerian inheritance peddlers. It isn't much, but >it's something. Even though I do use the paid version, Hotmail is spammer's >paradise. If you could get people to filter Hotmail and all the yahoo.* >mailers, it would go a long way towards cleaning up the Internet. However, many people use the yahoo mail groups. barring all of the yahoo domain will just ruin one service in exchange for nothing. the loss would be the low cost free mail groups. Back in the day a e-mail list would cost a person 25-30 bucks to run or (run in the background of his shell account if the admin didn't care some did and some didn't) it isn't the low cost/free accounts that are the problem it is the ISPs and the Lusers. I have in the last 20 years killed a multitude of accounts for abuse and worked an abuse desk at an ISP. It is a waste of time killing accounts. >Earle > >"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >news:r6kZh.83538$2Q1.45905@newsfe16.lga... >> The Merg wrote: >> > Wrong group again, Doug :P >> >> Yep. >> >> It has something to do with what group I just >> finished reading. The post is automated and >> should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email >> but for some reason it follows the newsreader. >> >> -- >> DougW >> >> > -- Ak'toh'di |
Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:52:27 -0600, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
"Earle Horton" <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote: >I have gotten a few Hotmail and Yahoo! mail accounts cancelled, based on >reporting spammers and Nigerian inheritance peddlers. It isn't much, but >it's something. Even though I do use the paid version, Hotmail is spammer's >paradise. If you could get people to filter Hotmail and all the yahoo.* >mailers, it would go a long way towards cleaning up the Internet. However, many people use the yahoo mail groups. barring all of the yahoo domain will just ruin one service in exchange for nothing. the loss would be the low cost free mail groups. Back in the day a e-mail list would cost a person 25-30 bucks to run or (run in the background of his shell account if the admin didn't care some did and some didn't) it isn't the low cost/free accounts that are the problem it is the ISPs and the Lusers. I have in the last 20 years killed a multitude of accounts for abuse and worked an abuse desk at an ISP. It is a waste of time killing accounts. >Earle > >"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >news:r6kZh.83538$2Q1.45905@newsfe16.lga... >> The Merg wrote: >> > Wrong group again, Doug :P >> >> Yep. >> >> It has something to do with what group I just >> finished reading. The post is automated and >> should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email >> but for some reason it follows the newsreader. >> >> -- >> DougW >> >> > -- Ak'toh'di |
Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:52:27 -0600, in rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys,
"Earle Horton" <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote: >I have gotten a few Hotmail and Yahoo! mail accounts cancelled, based on >reporting spammers and Nigerian inheritance peddlers. It isn't much, but >it's something. Even though I do use the paid version, Hotmail is spammer's >paradise. If you could get people to filter Hotmail and all the yahoo.* >mailers, it would go a long way towards cleaning up the Internet. However, many people use the yahoo mail groups. barring all of the yahoo domain will just ruin one service in exchange for nothing. the loss would be the low cost free mail groups. Back in the day a e-mail list would cost a person 25-30 bucks to run or (run in the background of his shell account if the admin didn't care some did and some didn't) it isn't the low cost/free accounts that are the problem it is the ISPs and the Lusers. I have in the last 20 years killed a multitude of accounts for abuse and worked an abuse desk at an ISP. It is a waste of time killing accounts. >Earle > >"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message >news:r6kZh.83538$2Q1.45905@newsfe16.lga... >> The Merg wrote: >> > Wrong group again, Doug :P >> >> Yep. >> >> It has something to do with what group I just >> finished reading. The post is automated and >> should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email >> but for some reason it follows the newsreader. >> >> -- >> DougW >> >> > -- Ak'toh'di |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands