Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Thank you for working behind the scenes for us.

Your welcome.

I try to make life as miserable for the spammers as
they make it for my inbox. :)

--
DougW

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:

> Nice link :)

Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.

--
DougW
"Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:

> Nice link :)

Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.

--
DougW
"Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:

> Nice link :)

Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.

--
DougW
"Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:

> Nice link :)

Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.

--
DougW
"Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for spammers

Coasty

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:K0wZh.83898$2Q1.44080@newsfe16.lga...
> SnoMan wrote:
>
>> Nice link :)
>
> Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
> to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.
>
> --
> DougW
> "Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.
>

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for spammers

Coasty

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:K0wZh.83898$2Q1.44080@newsfe16.lga...
> SnoMan wrote:
>
>> Nice link :)
>
> Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
> to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.
>
> --
> DougW
> "Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.
>

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for spammers

Coasty

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:K0wZh.83898$2Q1.44080@newsfe16.lga...
> SnoMan wrote:
>
>> Nice link :)
>
> Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
> to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.
>
> --
> DougW
> "Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.
>

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for spammers

Coasty

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:K0wZh.83898$2Q1.44080@newsfe16.lga...
> SnoMan wrote:
>
>> Nice link :)
>
> Thanks, I'm hoping with a bit more work
> to put a serious dent in some spammer operations.
>
> --
> DougW
> "Tread Lightly" does not apply to spammer nads.
>

Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

Coasty wrote:
> I still would rather read an oil thread and use the kill file for
> spammers

Ok..

If you could convert a spammer to oil what weight would it be?

--
DougW