Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
<earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:

>Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...


This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com

Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
<earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:

>Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...


This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com

Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
<earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:

>Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...


This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com

Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

The Merg wrote:
> Wrong group again, Doug :P

Yep.

It has something to do with what group I just
finished reading. The post is automated and
should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email
but for some reason it follows the newsreader.

--
DougW

Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

The Merg wrote:
> Wrong group again, Doug :P

Yep.

It has something to do with what group I just
finished reading. The post is automated and
should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email
but for some reason it follows the newsreader.

--
DougW

Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

The Merg wrote:
> Wrong group again, Doug :P

Yep.

It has something to do with what group I just
finished reading. The post is automated and
should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email
but for some reason it follows the newsreader.

--
DougW

Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

The Merg wrote:
> Wrong group again, Doug :P

Yep.

It has something to do with what group I just
finished reading. The post is automated and
should only go to news.admin.net-abuse.email
but for some reason it follows the newsreader.

--
DougW

Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>
>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>
>
> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.

Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt

That post is a daily sweep of new sites.

--
DougW

Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>
>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>
>
> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.

Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt

That post is a daily sweep of new sites.

--
DougW

Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
 

SnoMan wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>
>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>
>
> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.

Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt

That post is a daily sweep of new sites.

--
DougW