|
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
Jerry -- Jerry Bransford PP-ASEL N6TAY See the Geezer Jeep at http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ "RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would > have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James > > Oh and BTW Jerry, > > There were NO nude girl pics on jeeprubicon.com and they still took it." > > Now answer the question. > > The way I see it is, one you think the outcome would be different for > Dennis or two you are just taking "pot shots" at Nathan. Seeing how Nathan > isn't involved in this conversation personally, if it is option two then > Bill has more than one leg to stand on, with regards to his opinion of > you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... >> True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name >> in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. >> >> Jerry >> -- >> Jerry Bransford >> PP-ASEL N6TAY >> See the Geezer Jeep at >> http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
Jerry -- Jerry Bransford PP-ASEL N6TAY See the Geezer Jeep at http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ "RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would > have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James > > Oh and BTW Jerry, > > There were NO nude girl pics on jeeprubicon.com and they still took it." > > Now answer the question. > > The way I see it is, one you think the outcome would be different for > Dennis or two you are just taking "pot shots" at Nathan. Seeing how Nathan > isn't involved in this conversation personally, if it is option two then > Bill has more than one leg to stand on, with regards to his opinion of > you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... >> True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name >> in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. >> >> Jerry >> -- >> Jerry Bransford >> PP-ASEL N6TAY >> See the Geezer Jeep at >> http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
--- Personally, I am of the opinion Nathan was attacked by D.C. lawyers
because of Lloyd R. Parker. The babes excuse was just a smoke screen. Nathan got into Parker's face, here in this group, and Parker called his old student at the law firm, in Atlanta, that represented D.C. She, being a fellow tree-hugging liberal, used her position, and D.C.'s money and power, to attack Nathan as a personal favor to her old professor. --- That is my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. --- Regards --- D.J. www.SpecialOps4x4.com |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
--- Personally, I am of the opinion Nathan was attacked by D.C. lawyers
because of Lloyd R. Parker. The babes excuse was just a smoke screen. Nathan got into Parker's face, here in this group, and Parker called his old student at the law firm, in Atlanta, that represented D.C. She, being a fellow tree-hugging liberal, used her position, and D.C.'s money and power, to attack Nathan as a personal favor to her old professor. --- That is my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. --- Regards --- D.J. www.SpecialOps4x4.com |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
--- Personally, I am of the opinion Nathan was attacked by D.C. lawyers
because of Lloyd R. Parker. The babes excuse was just a smoke screen. Nathan got into Parker's face, here in this group, and Parker called his old student at the law firm, in Atlanta, that represented D.C. She, being a fellow tree-hugging liberal, used her position, and D.C.'s money and power, to attack Nathan as a personal favor to her old professor. --- That is my opinion, and I'm sticking to it. --- Regards --- D.J. www.SpecialOps4x4.com |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James Where exactly did you get the idea that what JB said was that the results for Dennis would have been different? You're the only one that said that. All JB said was he would have sued Nate over the ---- if he had been DC. Shoot, he's not even the one that pulled Nate into the thread. That was mabar and you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... > > True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name > > in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James Where exactly did you get the idea that what JB said was that the results for Dennis would have been different? You're the only one that said that. All JB said was he would have sued Nate over the ---- if he had been DC. Shoot, he's not even the one that pulled Nate into the thread. That was mabar and you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... > > True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name > > in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James Where exactly did you get the idea that what JB said was that the results for Dennis would have been different? You're the only one that said that. All JB said was he would have sued Nate over the ---- if he had been DC. Shoot, he's not even the one that pulled Nate into the thread. That was mabar and you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... > > True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name > > in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect the facts. Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of cybersquatting. I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing on my business's name this past summer. "RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James > > Oh and BTW Jerry, > > There were NO nude girl pics on jeeprubicon.com and they still took it." > > Now answer the question. > > The way I see it is, one you think the outcome would be different for Dennis > or two you are just taking "pot shots" at Nathan. Seeing how Nathan isn't > involved in this conversation personally, if it is option two then Bill has > more than one leg to stand on, with regards to his opinion of you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... > > True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name > > in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. > > > > Jerry > > -- > > Jerry Bransford > > PP-ASEL N6TAY > > See the Geezer Jeep at > > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > > |
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect the facts. Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of cybersquatting. I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing on my business's name this past summer. "RocknTJ" <jetowle@cox.net> wrote in message news:T0_gd.195072$a85.138927@fed1read04... > Here Jerry I'll ask it again: > > "So Jerry, > > You think the outcome for Dennis would have been different if he would have > had topless chicks painted on his trailers? > That is interesting. > > I don't think so, but I am not a lawyer. > > --James > > Oh and BTW Jerry, > > There were NO nude girl pics on jeeprubicon.com and they still took it." > > Now answer the question. > > The way I see it is, one you think the outcome would be different for Dennis > or two you are just taking "pot shots" at Nathan. Seeing how Nathan isn't > involved in this conversation personally, if it is option two then Bill has > more than one leg to stand on, with regards to his opinion of you. > > > "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@cox.net> wrote in message > news:E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05... > > True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name > > in the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep. > > > > Jerry > > -- > > Jerry Bransford > > PP-ASEL N6TAY > > See the Geezer Jeep at > > http://members.cox.net/jerrypb/ > > |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands