Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Kick his ass, Seabass! Nice job Dennis!

Special Ops wrote:

> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Kick his ass, Seabass! Nice job Dennis!

Special Ops wrote:

> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Kick his ass, Seabass! Nice job Dennis!

Special Ops wrote:

> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw

03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Heh.

The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.

Way to go Dennis!

--
DougW

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Heh.

The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.

Way to go Dennis!

--
DougW

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Heh.

The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.

Way to go Dennis!

--
DougW

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
Willys Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
D.J.




www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
Willys Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
D.J.




www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
Willys Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
D.J.




www.SpecialOps4x4.com

Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
 

My only regret is that I won't be able to drive down to Toledo anymore and
pick one up when the time comes. Best of luck to you in AZ, Dennis, and let
us know when your move is complete and your AZ operation is in production.

"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
> Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> > FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
> Heh.
>
> The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
> Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
>
> Way to go Dennis!
>
> --
> DougW
>
>