No.

I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate had
owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.

--James

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:U7Sgd.2810$up1.2209@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> Wasn't it JeepRubicon.com ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

No.

I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate had
owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.

--James

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:U7Sgd.2810$up1.2209@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> Wasn't it JeepRubicon.com ?
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

 

No to you too :-)

From the man himself (5 May 03)

"i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love my
jeep" website
around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or ---- of any
type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."

rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:VPSgd.192841$a85.85772@fed1read04...
>
> No.
>
> I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
> Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate
had
> owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.
>
> --James
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:U7Sgd.2810$up1.2209@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> > Wasn't it JeepRubicon.com ?
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>

 

No to you too :-)

From the man himself (5 May 03)

"i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love my
jeep" website
around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or ---- of any
type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."

rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:VPSgd.192841$a85.85772@fed1read04...
>
> No.
>
> I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
> Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate
had
> owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.
>
> --James
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:U7Sgd.2810$up1.2209@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> > Wasn't it JeepRubicon.com ?
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>

 

No to you too :-)

From the man himself (5 May 03)

"i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love my
jeep" website
around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or ---- of any
type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."

rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).

Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ

"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:VPSgd.192841$a85.85772@fed1read04...
>
> No.
>
> I think you might be getting rubicon.com confused with hardcorejeep.com.
> Rubicon.com was Nate's and wasn't even "online" really. Even though Nate
had
> owned it way before the Rubicon Jeep was introduced DC stold it.
>
> --James
>
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
> news:U7Sgd.2810$up1.2209@text.news.blueyonder.co.u k...
> > Wasn't it JeepRubicon.com ?
> >
> > Dave Milne, Scotland
> > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>
>

 

Congratulations Dennis!

Tom


"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

 

Congratulations Dennis!

Tom


"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

 

Congratulations Dennis!

Tom


"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>

 

Oops..... thanks Dave

I still think the ball is in Jerry's court. LOL

--James

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:35Tgd.2853$up1.660@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk ...
> No to you too :-)
>
> From the man himself (5 May 03)
>
> "i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love
> my
> jeep" website
> around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
> hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or ---- of
> any
> type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."
>
> rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>

 

Oops..... thanks Dave

I still think the ball is in Jerry's court. LOL

--James

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote in message
news:35Tgd.2853$up1.660@text.news.blueyonder.co.uk ...
> No to you too :-)
>
> From the man himself (5 May 03)
>
> "i registered jeeprubicon.com/.net/info strictly to build another "i love
> my
> jeep" website
> around my rubicon. for the record, jeeprubicon.com/.net/info as well has
> hardcorejeep.net/org has NEVER had any questionable material or ---- of
> any
> type. only hardcorejeep.com had the babes."
>
> rubicon.com is active (albeit a bit wierd).
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
>