Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
10-30-2004, 12:33 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Well done!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
10-30-2004, 12:52 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
hears the news.
I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
--James
"mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> Nathan, where are you?
>
>
> "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 12:52 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
hears the news.
I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
--James
"mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> Nathan, where are you?
>
>
> "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 12:52 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
hears the news.
I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
--James
"mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> Nathan, where are you?
>
>
> "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:34 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name in
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:34 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name in
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:34 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
True but he was also posting ---- pics on his site that used Jeep's name in
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
the URL. I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:pZydncLXW8fVQB7cRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
> never got real legal advice.
>
> "RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>>
>> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when
>> he
>> hears the news.
>> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
>> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
>> > Nathan, where are you?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
>> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
>> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:37 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:37 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
10-30-2004, 02:37 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Perhaps, but the facts of Nate's case were completely different, and he
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
never got real legal advice.
"RocknTJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
news:6FPgd.192755$a85.36858@fed1read04...
>
> I posted it on his board. I am sure he will be grinning ear-to-ear when he
> hears the news.
> I still think DC should have paid Nate for rubicon.com.
>
> --James
>
> "mabar" <mabar@NoSpamgrbonline.com> wrote in message
> news:vsOdnehM7c-oGx7cRVn-3g@gbronline.com...
> > Nathan, where are you?
> >
> >
> > "Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> >> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
> >>
> >
> >
>
>