Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
10-30-2004, 10:53 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
My only regret is that I won't be able to drive down to Toledo anymore and
pick one up when the time comes. Best of luck to you in AZ, Dennis, and let
us know when your move is complete and your AZ operation is in production.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
> Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> > FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
> Heh.
>
> The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
> Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
>
> Way to go Dennis!
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
pick one up when the time comes. Best of luck to you in AZ, Dennis, and let
us know when your move is complete and your AZ operation is in production.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
> Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> > FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
> Heh.
>
> The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
> Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
>
> Way to go Dennis!
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
10-30-2004, 10:53 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
My only regret is that I won't be able to drive down to Toledo anymore and
pick one up when the time comes. Best of luck to you in AZ, Dennis, and let
us know when your move is complete and your AZ operation is in production.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
> Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> > FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
> Heh.
>
> The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
> Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
>
> Way to go Dennis!
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
pick one up when the time comes. Best of luck to you in AZ, Dennis, and let
us know when your move is complete and your AZ operation is in production.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ODMgd.92256$tU4.84566@okepread06...
> Special Ops did pass the time by typing:
> > FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
> Heh.
>
> The key in there is Dennis had the rights to the "Rubicon (tm)".
> Just think what DC had to pay him for that. And rightfully too.
>
> Way to go Dennis!
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
10-30-2004, 11:50 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
This is great news. I am very happy for you and yours. I have been wondering
how things were going on this. Even though I only know you through cyber
space, I feel like your friend and have been pulling for you the entire
time.
When I get my junk repaired and if you are back in AZ please look me up
through the Az Virtual Jeep Club. I would love to go wheeling with you and
buy you a cold beverage.
Regards,
--JamesT
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 11:50 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
This is great news. I am very happy for you and yours. I have been wondering
how things were going on this. Even though I only know you through cyber
space, I feel like your friend and have been pulling for you the entire
time.
When I get my junk repaired and if you are back in AZ please look me up
through the Az Virtual Jeep Club. I would love to go wheeling with you and
buy you a cold beverage.
Regards,
--JamesT
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 11:50 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
This is great news. I am very happy for you and yours. I have been wondering
how things were going on this. Even though I only know you through cyber
space, I feel like your friend and have been pulling for you the entire
time.
When I get my junk repaired and if you are back in AZ please look me up
through the Az Virtual Jeep Club. I would love to go wheeling with you and
buy you a cold beverage.
Regards,
--JamesT
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:17724-41835F40-9@storefull-3234.bay.webtv.net...
> FYI ==> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...mstories02.asp
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 12:20 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Congrats! :)
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 12:20 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Congrats! :)
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 12:20 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Congrats! :)
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
Jerry
--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
"Special Ops" <SpecialOps4x4@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:10403-4183A4FC-50@storefull-3235.bay.webtv.net...
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
>
10-30-2004, 12:33 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Well done!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
10-30-2004, 12:33 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Well done!
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Special Ops wrote:
>
> Dave --- The reporter misunderstood the May ruling. D.C. lost on all
> of their motions in that ruling, except one. The judge ruled that I
> could no longer use NOS CJ-7 tailgates, which I was obtaining from
> ****** Overland Motors Inc., here in Toledo. Those tailgates (for
> CJ-7's), which had been manufactured by Chrysler, said Jeep on them.
> However, he did not prohibit me from using other tailgates manufactured
> by Jeep, or anyone else, which did not say Jeep on them. Since that
> supply of tailgates had been depleted, and there are no more of them,
> that I know of, it was a hollow victory for D.C. I could no longer use
> tailgates which I could no longer get, anyway. So what? --- The judge
> then ruled against D.C. on all of their motions for summary judgement.
> That left D.C. out of ammo with nothing standing between them and a jury
> trial. And, there was no way they wanted to face a jury. I, on the other
> hand, was still fully loaded with more ammo than Carter has liver pills.
> The May ruling was a resounding defeat for D.C. Even the arrogant D.C.
> lawyers, from Atlanta, could see the writing on the wall. --- So, you
> are correct, Dave. I can still use new Jeep parts, just as long as they
> don't say Jeep on them. --- Thank you for your interest. --- Regards ---
> D.J.
>
>
>
> www.SpecialOps4x4.com
