Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
10-31-2004, 11:10 AM
#113
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05>...
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
10-31-2004, 11:10 AM
#114
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05>...
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
10-31-2004, 11:10 AM
#115
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<E8Rgd.68272$bk1.5156@fed1read05>...
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
> I would have sued him too if I were Jeep.
you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
:-)
sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
your heart will consume you.
10-31-2004, 11:13 AM
#116
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<QKUgd.70835$bk1.50265@fed1read05>...
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
10-31-2004, 11:13 AM
#117
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<QKUgd.70835$bk1.50265@fed1read05>...
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
10-31-2004, 11:13 AM
#118
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
"Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message news:<QKUgd.70835$bk1.50265@fed1read05>...
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
> If you didn't see all of the pics posted on there some of which would easily
> classify as ---- by almost anyone then I don't know what to tell you.
nice try short-stop. the issue youve clearly tried to avoid answering
was the other 5 URLS having _nothing_ to do with the babes. as for
your prudish opinion on what constitutes ----, no one will deny you
that. you may be offended by simple feminine nudity, but some of us
find it quite beautiful. :-)
10-31-2004, 11:17 AM
#119
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
Oh, c'mon! Jerry's entitled to his opinion and he's stated since day one
that he thought the 'girls' were offbase for a site purposefully
associated with a specific product. I don't think he's attacking Nathan.
In fact, I believe Nathan took the girls off the site before this
thing was settled making me think that Nathan might have seen their
point himself. Personally, I can see where DC might have come in and
asked for the two (girls/Jeeps) to be disassociated and legally
requested a cease and desist, but the theft of the URL by DC was WAY
over the top and plain wrong. They bullied Nathan because they could.
Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
his case. Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
well as differences. Because of Nathan's case outcome, I feel Dennis'
case is a sweeter victory.
RocknTJ wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> "rubicon" and ---- have nothing to do with each other in this conversation.
> You didn't "state your opinion" you took a cheap shot at Nathan.
> I am thinking more and more Bill is correct. Get some huevos man, if your
> going to take a cheap shot, say so.
>
> --James
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
>
>>James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
>>
>>Jerry
>>--
>>Jerry Bransford
>>PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>See the Geezer Jeep at
>>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
that he thought the 'girls' were offbase for a site purposefully
associated with a specific product. I don't think he's attacking Nathan.
In fact, I believe Nathan took the girls off the site before this
thing was settled making me think that Nathan might have seen their
point himself. Personally, I can see where DC might have come in and
asked for the two (girls/Jeeps) to be disassociated and legally
requested a cease and desist, but the theft of the URL by DC was WAY
over the top and plain wrong. They bullied Nathan because they could.
Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
his case. Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
well as differences. Because of Nathan's case outcome, I feel Dennis'
case is a sweeter victory.
RocknTJ wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> "rubicon" and ---- have nothing to do with each other in this conversation.
> You didn't "state your opinion" you took a cheap shot at Nathan.
> I am thinking more and more Bill is correct. Get some huevos man, if your
> going to take a cheap shot, say so.
>
> --James
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
>
>>James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
>>
>>Jerry
>>--
>>Jerry Bransford
>>PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>See the Geezer Jeep at
>>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
10-31-2004, 11:17 AM
#120
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
Oh, c'mon! Jerry's entitled to his opinion and he's stated since day one
that he thought the 'girls' were offbase for a site purposefully
associated with a specific product. I don't think he's attacking Nathan.
In fact, I believe Nathan took the girls off the site before this
thing was settled making me think that Nathan might have seen their
point himself. Personally, I can see where DC might have come in and
asked for the two (girls/Jeeps) to be disassociated and legally
requested a cease and desist, but the theft of the URL by DC was WAY
over the top and plain wrong. They bullied Nathan because they could.
Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
his case. Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
well as differences. Because of Nathan's case outcome, I feel Dennis'
case is a sweeter victory.
RocknTJ wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> "rubicon" and ---- have nothing to do with each other in this conversation.
> You didn't "state your opinion" you took a cheap shot at Nathan.
> I am thinking more and more Bill is correct. Get some huevos man, if your
> going to take a cheap shot, say so.
>
> --James
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
>
>>James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
>>
>>Jerry
>>--
>>Jerry Bransford
>>PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>See the Geezer Jeep at
>>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
that he thought the 'girls' were offbase for a site purposefully
associated with a specific product. I don't think he's attacking Nathan.
In fact, I believe Nathan took the girls off the site before this
thing was settled making me think that Nathan might have seen their
point himself. Personally, I can see where DC might have come in and
asked for the two (girls/Jeeps) to be disassociated and legally
requested a cease and desist, but the theft of the URL by DC was WAY
over the top and plain wrong. They bullied Nathan because they could.
Dennis had far more in the way of legal legs to stand on and rightly won
his case. Like it or not, the two cases DO have some similarities as
well as differences. Because of Nathan's case outcome, I feel Dennis'
case is a sweeter victory.
RocknTJ wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> "rubicon" and ---- have nothing to do with each other in this conversation.
> You didn't "state your opinion" you took a cheap shot at Nathan.
> I am thinking more and more Bill is correct. Get some huevos man, if your
> going to take a cheap shot, say so.
>
> --James
>
> "Jerry Bransford" <jerrypb@***.net> wrote in message
> news:Hc_gd.71029$bk1.69576@fed1read05...
>
>>James, I stated my opinion, stand by it, and I won't debate it with you.
>>
>>Jerry
>>--
>>Jerry Bransford
>>PP-ASEL N6TAY
>>See the Geezer Jeep at
>>http://members.***.net/jerrypb/
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
