SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
10-28-2004, 04:01 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
But guys,
On or about the 27th of OCTOBER my 1999 TJ went over its RECOMMENDED
MILEAGE BEFORE AN OIL CHANGE, which the SADISTIC FBI didn't change for
me just to TERRORIZE ME and say I'm LAZY!
There, back on topic :)
Matt
On or about the 27th of OCTOBER my 1999 TJ went over its RECOMMENDED
MILEAGE BEFORE AN OIL CHANGE, which the SADISTIC FBI didn't change for
me just to TERRORIZE ME and say I'm LAZY!
There, back on topic :)
Matt
10-29-2004, 10:43 AM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Right. It states that items sent to the (presumably uu.net) email
listserver will be effectively CC'd to Usenet, but not vice-versa.
</done being devil's advocate>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:12:02 GMT, "jeff"
<jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote:
>This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
>prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
>
>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>news:41803F49.4E7D39AD@***.net...
>> "The articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to
>> Usenet but not vise versa."
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-29-2004, 10:43 AM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Right. It states that items sent to the (presumably uu.net) email
listserver will be effectively CC'd to Usenet, but not vice-versa.
</done being devil's advocate>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:12:02 GMT, "jeff"
<jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote:
>This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
>prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
>
>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>news:41803F49.4E7D39AD@***.net...
>> "The articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to
>> Usenet but not vise versa."
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-29-2004, 10:43 AM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Right. It states that items sent to the (presumably uu.net) email
listserver will be effectively CC'd to Usenet, but not vice-versa.
</done being devil's advocate>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:12:02 GMT, "jeff"
<jalowe44.del.ete.this@hotmail..com.invaid> wrote:
>This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
>prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
>
>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>news:41803F49.4E7D39AD@***.net...
>> "The articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to
>> Usenet but not vise versa."
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-29-2004, 11:40 AM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Bill, every time you open your mouth and spout uninformed opinion as fact
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
10-29-2004, 11:40 AM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Bill, every time you open your mouth and spout uninformed opinion as fact
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
10-29-2004, 11:40 AM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: SELL this FBI NOC LIST and MAKE MILLIONS like TOM CRUISE did in MISSION IMPOSSIBLE
Bill, every time you open your mouth and spout uninformed opinion as fact
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
you make a complete jackass out of yourself. As I pointed out to you, in
support of the previous poster, cross-posting is not prohibited by the
charter. <ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announce.newgroups/
rec/rec.autos.makers.jeep+******> You have taken the statement "The
articles sent to the Jeep listserver will be cross-posted to Usenet but not
vise versa." and read something into it that does not exist. This statement
has absolutely nothing to do with cross-posting on usenet. It is a
reflection of the origins of RAMJW as a group derived from the jeep-l
listserv group. Postings to the original jeep-l were cross-posted into
Usenet, but not the other way around. Cross posting can be a valuable tool,
for example, if I was looking for information putting a Mexican 282 in my
YJ, I would cross-post to rec.autos.makers.amc as well as here. FWIW, I
checked my Verison TOS is here: <
http://www.verizon.net/policies/popups/tos_popup.asp> and I see no bans on
cross-posting. Please note that I have cross-posted this to an appropriate
news group, although for you I think perhaps AUK might be more to the point
given your history of netkopping people who disagree with you.
--
jeff
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41814D43.AA95F6E7@***.net...
> Start cross posting and 64.222.176.166 will be history.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> jeff wrote:
> >
> > This says nothing about Usenet cross-posting. Nothing in the charter
> > prohibits cross-posting, however it is not good form to do so.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stephen
Jeep Mailing List
6
11-03-2004 06:31 AM
John105
Jeep Mailing List
12
11-02-2004 12:02 PM
Dillon Pyron
Jeep Mailing List
0
11-01-2004 10:54 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
