L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III

I meant Matt.

"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> I concede it has two bearings as Mike also said.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87263B.BD55A0A6@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>Complete with breather, of course you know Daimler wouldn't have
>truck bearings in a their version of the XJ, ZJ, or TJ.

Thank AMC....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87263B.BD55A0A6@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>Complete with breather, of course you know Daimler wouldn't have
>truck bearings in a their version of the XJ, ZJ, or TJ.

Thank AMC....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87263B.BD55A0A6@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>Complete with breather, of course you know Daimler wouldn't have
>truck bearings in a their version of the XJ, ZJ, or TJ.

Thank AMC....
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87282C.C4AE280C@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>
> I meant Matt.
>
>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>>
>> I concede it has two bearings as Mike also said.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

I took his statement to mean in his picture of the new assembly installation,

http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/lrhubs/P9080484.JPG

the "space" he was referring to, he asserted was a race where another,
external bearing is installed, and that is not the case. It's just the lip
machined into the flange that the center hole of the wheel fits around.

Internally, I believe it does have two bearings.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87282C.C4AE280C@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>
> I meant Matt.
>
>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>>
>> I concede it has two bearings as Mike also said.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

I took his statement to mean in his picture of the new assembly installation,

http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/lrhubs/P9080484.JPG

the "space" he was referring to, he asserted was a race where another,
external bearing is installed, and that is not the case. It's just the lip
machined into the flange that the center hole of the wheel fits around.

Internally, I believe it does have two bearings.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <3F87282C.C4AE280C@***.net>, L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) ------
III <----------@***.net> writes:

>
> I meant Matt.
>
>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>>
>> I concede it has two bearings as Mike also said.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

I took his statement to mean in his picture of the new assembly installation,

http://www.jeepaholics.com/tech/lrhubs/P9080484.JPG

the "space" he was referring to, he asserted was a race where another,
external bearing is installed, and that is not the case. It's just the lip
machined into the flange that the center hole of the wheel fits around.

Internally, I believe it does have two bearings.
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <BFFhb.21585$%C5.10098@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>, John Sevey
<seveyj@no.spam.like.substance.wi.rr.com> writes:

>Matt Macchiarolo <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote:
>> In Bill's pic, the assembly is sitting wheel flange down. The side of the
>> assembly facing up is what fits into the knuckle bore, so that would be the
>> "inner bearing" equivalent. It will separate between the wheel flange and
>the
>> trangular knuckle mount, (ask me how I know) though it isn't desgined to do
>> that normally.
>
>I suspect that I know exactly how. You probably did the same thing that I
>did when trying to get the assembly off. You used a puller, didn't you? :)

On my now sold 93 XJ. Yep, it was split about 1/2". When I noticed what was
happening, I put the axle nut back on and squeezed it back together again. I
ended up getting some longer bolts to replace the 12-points that held the unit
on the knuckle, threaded them in with about 1/2" clearance, and used them as
tapping points, tapped enough to get a pry tool to work it out the rest of the
way.

>
>> There is no bearing on the outside of the wheel flange. The axleshaft
>simply
>> slips into the splined bore in the bearing assembly, and the axle nut (and
>> washer IIRC) threads on the end of the axleshaft.
>
>Now I wish that I had taken pictures during the replacement, but I'd swear
>that
>mine had two bearings -- see my other reply to Bill's post and a link to a
>cutaway of a similar model available from Timken.
>

I can't think of any reason why it would be different from a '93. Think about
it, the axle stub is always rotating and slips into the splines of the hub
assembly, so the splined bore, which is attached to the wheel flange, is also
spinning. There'd be no reason to put an outer bearing there.


>I'm more than willing to believe both yourself and Bill. I should know
>better
>than to disagree with Bill. :)

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <BFFhb.21585$%C5.10098@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>, John Sevey
<seveyj@no.spam.like.substance.wi.rr.com> writes:

>Matt Macchiarolo <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote:
>> In Bill's pic, the assembly is sitting wheel flange down. The side of the
>> assembly facing up is what fits into the knuckle bore, so that would be the
>> "inner bearing" equivalent. It will separate between the wheel flange and
>the
>> trangular knuckle mount, (ask me how I know) though it isn't desgined to do
>> that normally.
>
>I suspect that I know exactly how. You probably did the same thing that I
>did when trying to get the assembly off. You used a puller, didn't you? :)

On my now sold 93 XJ. Yep, it was split about 1/2". When I noticed what was
happening, I put the axle nut back on and squeezed it back together again. I
ended up getting some longer bolts to replace the 12-points that held the unit
on the knuckle, threaded them in with about 1/2" clearance, and used them as
tapping points, tapped enough to get a pry tool to work it out the rest of the
way.

>
>> There is no bearing on the outside of the wheel flange. The axleshaft
>simply
>> slips into the splined bore in the bearing assembly, and the axle nut (and
>> washer IIRC) threads on the end of the axleshaft.
>
>Now I wish that I had taken pictures during the replacement, but I'd swear
>that
>mine had two bearings -- see my other reply to Bill's post and a link to a
>cutaway of a similar model available from Timken.
>

I can't think of any reason why it would be different from a '93. Think about
it, the axle stub is always rotating and slips into the splines of the hub
assembly, so the splined bore, which is attached to the wheel flange, is also
spinning. There'd be no reason to put an outer bearing there.


>I'm more than willing to believe both yourself and Bill. I should know
>better
>than to disagree with Bill. :)

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html

Matt Macchiarolo

In article <BFFhb.21585$%C5.10098@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com>, John Sevey
<seveyj@no.spam.like.substance.wi.rr.com> writes:

>Matt Macchiarolo <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote:
>> In Bill's pic, the assembly is sitting wheel flange down. The side of the
>> assembly facing up is what fits into the knuckle bore, so that would be the
>> "inner bearing" equivalent. It will separate between the wheel flange and
>the
>> trangular knuckle mount, (ask me how I know) though it isn't desgined to do
>> that normally.
>
>I suspect that I know exactly how. You probably did the same thing that I
>did when trying to get the assembly off. You used a puller, didn't you? :)

On my now sold 93 XJ. Yep, it was split about 1/2". When I noticed what was
happening, I put the axle nut back on and squeezed it back together again. I
ended up getting some longer bolts to replace the 12-points that held the unit
on the knuckle, threaded them in with about 1/2" clearance, and used them as
tapping points, tapped enough to get a pry tool to work it out the rest of the
way.

>
>> There is no bearing on the outside of the wheel flange. The axleshaft
>simply
>> slips into the splined bore in the bearing assembly, and the axle nut (and
>> washer IIRC) threads on the end of the axleshaft.
>
>Now I wish that I had taken pictures during the replacement, but I'd swear
>that
>mine had two bearings -- see my other reply to Bill's post and a link to a
>cutaway of a similar model available from Timken.
>

I can't think of any reason why it would be different from a '93. Think about
it, the axle stub is always rotating and slips into the splines of the hub
assembly, so the splined bore, which is attached to the wheel flange, is also
spinning. There'd be no reason to put an outer bearing there.


>I'm more than willing to believe both yourself and Bill. I should know
>better
>than to disagree with Bill. :)

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html