Question for Mike
10-11-2003, 01:44 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
They don't in Vail, CO. Amagine that! '75 I6 No smog.
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 01:44 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
They don't in Vail, CO. Amagine that! '75 I6 No smog.
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 01:44 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
They don't in Vail, CO. Amagine that! '75 I6 No smog.
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
--
Thanks Always !!!
Paul '75 CJ5 258
Vail, CO.
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 09:26 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 09:26 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 09:26 AM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
smog as much as you want.
Nelson
"Snow" <snowball_2004@msn.com> wrote in message
news:FpMhb.15241$oO4.1289657@news20.bellglobal.com ...
> Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
>
> Snow...
>
> "Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
> news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
> or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
> >
> >
>
>
10-11-2003, 03:49 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Interesting, this coming from an area where you can't even burn a
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
10-11-2003, 03:49 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Interesting, this coming from an area where you can't even burn a
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
10-11-2003, 03:49 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Interesting, this coming from an area where you can't even burn a
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Nelson wrote:
>
> Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker and
> a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are free to
> smog as much as you want.
>
> Nelson
10-11-2003, 05:30 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
hahaha, ya well almost!!! Actually since we had a big ice storm, with 2-3
days of ice falling on cables and all, power was out for up to 40 days in
some places (29 days for my self), alot of people have started to use wood
again as a secondary heat source :)
Nelson
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F885ED7.41CEFF13@***.net...
> Interesting, this coming from an area where you can't even burn a
> fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker
and
> > a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> > because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are
free to
> > smog as much as you want.
> >
> > Nelson
days of ice falling on cables and all, power was out for up to 40 days in
some places (29 days for my self), alot of people have started to use wood
again as a secondary heat source :)
Nelson
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F885ED7.41CEFF13@***.net...
> Interesting, this coming from an area where you can't even burn a
> fire in your own fireplace, because of it's pollution.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Not yet, it will probably be coming soon. Unless you have an old clunker
and
> > a police officer stops you to have a complete inspection of the vehicule
> > because he suspects that the vehicule is dangerous to drive, you are
free to
> > smog as much as you want.
> >
> > Nelson