Question for Mike
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Question for Mike
Hi Mike,
since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
not for that year vehicule?
Thanks,
Nelson
89YJ
since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
not for that year vehicule?
Thanks,
Nelson
89YJ
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
The YJ's need cats...
I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
have to pass a NOx reading.
Mike
Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Thanks Mike
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Thanks Mike
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Thanks Mike
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3F86B8FF.D24A82A2@sympatico.ca...
> Sorry, the CJ was the last of the Jeep 'utility' vehicles.
>
> The YJ's need cats...
>
> I have tuned a few YJ's for emissions and they do require the cat and
> have to pass a NOx reading.
>
> Mike
>
> Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen
a
> > few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I
remember
> > when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they
made
> > it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> > utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> > upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> > not for that year vehicule?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nelson
> > 89YJ
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Question for Mike
Do they require a smog test in the belle province?
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>
Snow...
"Nelson" <newsgroups@optikadesign.qc.ca> wrote in message
news:44KdncsZg7thxhuiXTWQlg@giganews.com...
> Hi Mike,
>
> since you live in Canada and I also do (Montreal south shore), I've seen a
> few posts of yours about not needing a catalytic converter and I remember
> when I had my '83 Toyota 4x4 with a front solid axle (last year they made
> it) that it did not have one on it and didn't need it because it was a
> utility/recreation vehicule. Up to what year is this true? I now have
> upgraded to an 89 YJ :) and was wondering if I could take it out legally
or
> not for that year vehicule?
>
> Thanks,
> Nelson
> 89YJ
>
>