Is this Possible
09-05-2005, 11:02 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
the rims also have a different offset
Brian wrote:
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
Brian wrote:
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
09-05-2005, 01:29 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
09-05-2005, 01:29 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
09-05-2005, 01:29 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
09-05-2005, 01:29 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
they are any taller.
http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
Tom
"Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
>
> > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj springs
> > Is this wrong?
>
> The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> are different at all.
>
> B
>
> --
> Brian Heller
>
> It is easier to tame wild beasts
> than to conquer the human mind.
09-05-2005, 09:50 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
If the spring is the same length, but stiffer, it will make the standard
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
09-05-2005, 09:50 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
If the spring is the same length, but stiffer, it will make the standard
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
09-05-2005, 09:50 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
If the spring is the same length, but stiffer, it will make the standard
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
09-05-2005, 09:50 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is this Possible
If the spring is the same length, but stiffer, it will make the standard
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
Wrangler sit a little higher. Without knowing exactly how much weight is on
each spring, it would be difficult to calculate the height change, but it
could explain why the standard Wrangler sits higher with the Rubicon springs
installed.
Chris
"mabar" <xyzz4567@HotPop.com> wrote in message
news:431c8084_3@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> The springs are slightly heavier duty, to compensate for the extra 300 to
> 600 pounds that the Rubicon weighs over other Wranglers, but I don't think
> they are any taller.
>
> http://www.new-cars.com/2005/jeep/je...ler-specs.html
>
> Tom
>
> "Brian" <b_heller@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:b_heller-5F1DA3.22210204092005@news.verizon.net...
> > In article <1125696273.652199.228640@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups .com>,
> > "tjce" <Frankkenney@allstate.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I thoght that the Rubicon springs are 1" taller than regular tj
springs
> > > Is this wrong?
> >
> > The Rubicon's tires are 1" taller than a regular TJ (if it has the 30"
> > tire package; otherwise it's even more tall). I don't think the springs
> > are different at all.
> >
> > B
> >
> > --
> > Brian Heller
> >
> > It is easier to tame wild beasts
> > than to conquer the human mind.
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Marc
Jeep Mailing List
8
04-18-2004 01:45 PM
L.W.(=?iso-8859-1?Q?=DFill?=) Hughes III
Jeep Mailing List
12
11-19-2003 11:43 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)