plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
06-03-2004, 07:30 AM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
06-03-2004, 07:30 AM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
06-03-2004, 07:30 AM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
Wonder why.
> DougW wrote:
>>
>>> More like 50 psi.
>>
>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
06-03-2004, 03:53 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
It's a krout thing, we wouldn't understand.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
06-03-2004, 03:53 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
It's a krout thing, we wouldn't understand.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
06-03-2004, 03:53 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
It's a krout thing, we wouldn't understand.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
06-03-2004, 03:53 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
It's a krout thing, we wouldn't understand.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
DougW wrote:
>
> Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
> Wonder why.
06-03-2004, 11:38 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
In message <NZDvc.9291$W01.3961@okepread01>, "DougW" wrote:
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
06-03-2004, 11:38 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
In message <NZDvc.9291$W01.3961@okepread01>, "DougW" wrote:
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
06-03-2004, 11:38 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: plugs, etc, 1999 JGC
In message <NZDvc.9291$W01.3961@okepread01>, "DougW" wrote:
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
>L.W. (ßill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
>> The regulator's different than your ZJ:
>> http://www.----------.com/WJfuelpresure.pdf
>
>Interesting. At the tank rather than the rail.
>Wonder why.
Most are IN the tank on Jeeps now. Have been since about '95. I believe it's
to keep from heating the fuel and sending it back to the tank. Less vapor to
try to contain.
>
>> DougW wrote:
>>>
>>>> More like 50 psi.
>>>
>>> Doh! failure to parse the year.
>>> They bumped it up a tad didn't they.
>
>
