Pink Kate
#581
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Hi Mike,
Where do you thing the domestic dog inherited that trait?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Oh and I 'have' seen dog kill all gutted out nice with the dogs still
> chasing more. No wolves in sight.
>
> Mike
Where do you thing the domestic dog inherited that trait?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Oh and I 'have' seen dog kill all gutted out nice with the dogs still
> chasing more. No wolves in sight.
>
> Mike
#582
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Those dogs should have been shoot on sight as they have no fear of
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
#583
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Those dogs should have been shoot on sight as they have no fear of
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
#584
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Those dogs should have been shoot on sight as they have no fear of
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
man.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> My wife and I saw gutted deer on our way home from our New Years Jeep
> run. The dogs were still on that one and these 'dogs' had collars
> on... I didn't hear what the local's version was, but it sure wasn't
> wolves that live in the area that brought 'that' deer down... I did get
> a photo of what I believe was a wolf's track on top of a deer trail a
> few miles back the road too. They are in my sig line link. I didn't
> bother taking a photo with the dogs on the guts...
>
> But you know. I saw fresh wolf tracks on that deer trail about 10
> minutes back so the natural reaction might have been to think the wolf
> gutted the deer if I hadn't seen the dogs in action and known better...
> I know wolves 'eat' deer, they don't gut and leave them.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
#585
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Bill,
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
#586
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Bill,
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
#587
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Bill,
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
It's just Catholics and Mormons that are so... Prolific! I am
Presbyterian, both my Daughter and Son just before their marriages
converted to and were baptized Catholic. Which explains why I will be a
grandfather again, number seven in December. My grandparents would roll
over in their graves.
I am a Minuteman, so I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
fighting for my America.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
billy ray wrote:
>
> Now Bill....
>
> Is it all Catholics or just illegal Mexican Catholics? What about illegals
> from other religious upbringings?
#588
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle
#589
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle
#590
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle
We are picking and choosing which laws we will enforce, look at the
eleven million criminals invade our country.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> A couple years ago you thought that wolves were "beautiful", and didn't
> understand how anyone could kill them.
>
> No one believes that they are killing children. The whole thing hinges on
> how you define a "child". In the absence of a constitutional amendment,
> which is unlikely, we will have to depend on the Supreme Court, for our
> definition of "child". Now if the legal definition differs from yours, then
> you have a problem. But if you go bombing clinics, and try to use the
> defense, that you were "preventing children from being killed", then you
> don't have a legal leg to stand on.
>
> This is what I am talking about, with regard to people, who do what is
> "right", and violate the law. There are a lot of problems, not the least of
> which, is that the people who write the laws, might be a little smarter than
> you are. Its best to obey the law, unless you have a convincing, well
> thought out reason, for doing otherwise. "It was the right thing to do" is
> probably not good enough.
>
> Earle