Pink Kate
#261
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
I am not in principle against killing wolves, any more than I am against
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
#262
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
I am not in principle against killing wolves, any more than I am against
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
#263
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
I am not in principle against killing wolves, any more than I am against
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
killing deer, elk, bear, or any other species that has a legal hunting
season, or at least regulations in place for controlling it. But like your
article says there are about 10,000 wolves in Alaska. And the controls in
place and proposed, are part of a legal program, not a vigilante movement.
I know what rural people are like. They know everything, and they don't
want to hear anything, that they don't agree with. That's one reason they
put the state legislature house in the capital city.
When you don't obey the laws, then you are an anarchist or a criminal. This
is worse than "bleeding heart liberal wackos limps". It doesn't matter if
you believe that wolves or cougars are "evil". You don't kill them, unless
it is legal.
Earle
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444951B3.EAA6F49@***.net...
> Hi Earle,
> Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
> http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
> bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
> farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Earle Horton wrote:
> >
> > You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't
pretend
> > now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take
it up
> > with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around
with
> > "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
> >
> > You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> > without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> > would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty?
Reagan
> > isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive,
degenerative
> > brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
> >
> > Earle
#264
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
#265
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
#266
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Spdloader" <askforit@nospam.triad.rr.com> wrote in message
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
news:mUb2g.11$P65.2@southeast.rr.com...
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a
> > lot better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves,
lynx,
> > cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth
> > to defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
>
>
> You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
>
> We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car,
> on hwy 311 in south High Point.
>
I can see them from my window. At dawn in the winter they play in the field
where the summer motor home park is. At dusk sometimes they wander down
Blair Street, looking for stray dogs or cats, I guess.
Earle
#267
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nate,
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
#268
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nate,
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
#269
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Nate,
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
Your post was cut off, just as it was getting to the interesting bit. Was
it my news server?
Anyway, I have read several times, that there have been no documented
attacks of wolves, on humans. I assume that this is still true. A cougar
might attack your children, but afaik not a wolf. And the cougar, according
to published accounts, usually goes for the family dog first.
Earle
---snippy---
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
---Where's the rest of it?---
#270
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Save it for a couple of years. It will begin to make sense sooner or later.
I think you're just too damn independent, to fit in anywhere, even in
Montana.
That's not entirely a bad thing. ;^)
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:nPc2g.43$k01.1035@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44494206$0$14882$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > If your Montana locals are anything like the specimens we have in
> > Colorado,
> > they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too.
>
> despite the democrats best efforts to show otherwise, not everyone needs
> government to lead them around by the nose earle.
>
>
> > If you have any backbone at
> > all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them
>
> why would i come into conflict with folks i happen to agree with? your
> statements arent making any sense earle.
>
>
> > Where can you go next,
> > after you burn your bridges in Montana?
>
> what were you saying about reagan slipping mentally? what the hell are
you
> talking about earle? what bridges have i burned?
>
> .....and should i ever decide to leave, i can go anywhere i damn well
please
> because im self made and capable of supporting myself and my family rather
> well anywhere we decide to call home. :-)
>
>
>
> > You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of
"tree
> > huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with
> > small,
> > and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
>
> those are the places where i have spent time on business......reminds me
of
> missoula (home of 90% of the granolas in montana......i think theyre
voting
> to kick missoula out of montana next year) except on a much larger scale.
>
>
>
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness
>
> then you are in NO position to judge my understanding of wilderness. in
> about 12 hours ill be heading out to spend the weekend camping in the
heart
> of a large indian reservation. while i may be sleeping in comfort
> (http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7469) ill spend my
days
> trail riding with the very bears, wolves, and cougars we speak of.
perhaps
> ill share some pictures on sunday night when i get back.
>
>
> > I do tolerate it a lot
> > better than you do.
>
> i tolerate nature JUST FINE earle. i coexist in peace with anything that
> will peaceably coexist with me. i have some in the past, but i do not
hunt
> elk or deer. see http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4211
for
> pictures and video of deer and elk that i filmed instead of
shooting.....had
> no desire to kill them. i wouldnt even shoot a moose if i found one on my
> front doorstep http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7821 so
> long as he didnt try to hurt me. my problem is with anything that would
try
> to place my (or your) children below itself on the food chain.
> anything.....to include shooting sharks and gators (want pics? :-)
>
>
>
> > turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
> lol......bear, cougar, snakes, etc. arent the ANIMALS that i had a problem
> with in EASTERN north carolina (western north carolina is quite nice
> though). the ANIMALS in north carolina (G's dealing crack on every
corner)
> wouldnt be allowed up here.
>
>
>
> > I figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
>
I think you're just too damn independent, to fit in anywhere, even in
Montana.
That's not entirely a bad thing. ;^)
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:nPc2g.43$k01.1035@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44494206$0$14882$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > If your Montana locals are anything like the specimens we have in
> > Colorado,
> > they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too.
>
> despite the democrats best efforts to show otherwise, not everyone needs
> government to lead them around by the nose earle.
>
>
> > If you have any backbone at
> > all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them
>
> why would i come into conflict with folks i happen to agree with? your
> statements arent making any sense earle.
>
>
> > Where can you go next,
> > after you burn your bridges in Montana?
>
> what were you saying about reagan slipping mentally? what the hell are
you
> talking about earle? what bridges have i burned?
>
> .....and should i ever decide to leave, i can go anywhere i damn well
please
> because im self made and capable of supporting myself and my family rather
> well anywhere we decide to call home. :-)
>
>
>
> > You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of
"tree
> > huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with
> > small,
> > and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
>
> those are the places where i have spent time on business......reminds me
of
> missoula (home of 90% of the granolas in montana......i think theyre
voting
> to kick missoula out of montana next year) except on a much larger scale.
>
>
>
> > I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness
>
> then you are in NO position to judge my understanding of wilderness. in
> about 12 hours ill be heading out to spend the weekend camping in the
heart
> of a large indian reservation. while i may be sleeping in comfort
> (http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7469) ill spend my
days
> trail riding with the very bears, wolves, and cougars we speak of.
perhaps
> ill share some pictures on sunday night when i get back.
>
>
> > I do tolerate it a lot
> > better than you do.
>
> i tolerate nature JUST FINE earle. i coexist in peace with anything that
> will peaceably coexist with me. i have some in the past, but i do not
hunt
> elk or deer. see http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4211
for
> pictures and video of deer and elk that i filmed instead of
shooting.....had
> no desire to kill them. i wouldnt even shoot a moose if i found one on my
> front doorstep http://utilityoffroad.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=7821 so
> long as he didnt try to hurt me. my problem is with anything that would
try
> to place my (or your) children below itself on the food chain.
> anything.....to include shooting sharks and gators (want pics? :-)
>
>
>
> > turn the place into another North Carolina.
>
> lol......bear, cougar, snakes, etc. arent the ANIMALS that i had a problem
> with in EASTERN north carolina (western north carolina is quite nice
> though). the ANIMALS in north carolina (G's dealing crack on every
corner)
> wouldnt be allowed up here.
>
>
>
> > I figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
>
> i wouldnt have a problem with it earle, if they ate what they killed. i
> didnt grow to hate wolves until i stumbled across
>
>