Pink Kate
#231
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
If your Montana locals are anything like the specimens we have in Colorado,
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#232
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
If your Montana locals are anything like the specimens we have in Colorado,
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#233
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
If your Montana locals are anything like the specimens we have in Colorado,
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
they are dumb as a post, and self-serving too. If you have any backbone at
all, you will sooner or later come into conflict with them, and then you
will find out exactly how ignorant people can be. Where can you go next,
after you burn your bridges in Montana?
You don't know much about politics, if you think Colorado is full of "tree
huggers". The tree hugger belt extends from Denver to Boulder, with small,
and I do mean small, centers scattered throughout the rest of the state.
I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
I didn't notice the pictures, but here's one. http://www.pweeta.org I
figure a wolf has just as much right to eat a hamburger, as I do.
Earle
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:bea2g.46$2i5.6578@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:44490aaf$0$24450$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > overly romantic East Coast
> > city refugee mountain man wannabees stick out like a sore thumb and
> > disturb
> > that natural order.
>
> drop the ignorant horseshit until you spend some time up here with the
> locals. where the hell do you think i learned it? oonce upon a time i
was
> just as ignorant as you are (in relation to the wolf). i thought they
were
> beautiful animals and couldnt understand why so many NATIVE montanans ride
> around with "kill wolves" bumper stickers on their vehicles........until
it
> was explained to me and then i saw it for myself. continue to sit in your
> house and think the wolf looks pretty in pictures all you want. when you
> really want to find out for yourself, drag your *** out of your house and
go
> see for yourself. i notice you didnt respond at all to the pictures i
> linked you to. as ive said, youve spent to much time with the tree
huggers
> in colorado.
>
>
> > The ranchers out here lease federal and state lands for pennies, know
> > which
> > side their bread is buttered on, and rarely take such a hostile attitude
> > towards the local wildlife and the people who are looking out for it.
> > Many
> > of them are even conservationists of one kind or another.
>
> lol you cant begin to compare colorado ranchers with rural
montanans/wyoming
> folks where the wolf was dumped in their back yards.
>
>
> > It is odd, that many of those who would escape from the cities to live
in
> > the wilderness, cannot really stand the wilderness the way it is either.
>
> and YOU "understand" wilderness from colorado? lol.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>
#234
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
> I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
#235
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
> I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
#236
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
> I do not claim to "understand" the wilderness, but I do tolerate it a lot
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
> better than you do. I don't have plans to kill all the wolves, lynx,
> cougars, bear, rattlesnakes, and anything else that has claws or teeth to
> defend itself, and turn the place into another North Carolina.
You apparently haven't been to the part of NC I live in Earl.
We've got all the wildlife, even saw, SAW, a coyote, get hit by a car, on
hwy 311 in south High Point.
Spdloader
#237
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
#238
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
#239
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
They were domestic dogs, reverting to their inherited wolf
instinct, before we had the dog pound patrolling for unlicensed, free
dogs. California's farmers had long before my time poison the wolf.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> Are you sure these were wolves? From what I have read, and had
> confirmed by forest rangers and wildlife biologists, eating the guts first
> is what dogs do. Domestic dogs, and wolves, though they are closely related
> and can even breed together, have distinctively different behavior patterns,
> which identifies which species you are dealing with. That is, if you are
> not so overcome by rage at the federal government and bleeding heart liberal
> wackos, that you can't think straight any more.
>
> I am a little surprised that you don't attack Nate for being a "criminal"
> now. As you know, the democratic form of government is indeed a "popularity
> contest", not about "doing what you know is right". Anyone who strikes out
> on his own, defying laws written by our process, which is essentially one of
> consensus, is a criminal by your definition.
>
> It doesn't matter how "bad" wolves are, just as it doesn't matter how
> "unfair" our immigration laws are. You don't break the laws, eh? And if
> you do find it necessary to break the law, because your conscience cannot
> stand the alternative, then you stand up like a man and take your
> punishment.
>
> Earle
#240
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Hi Earle,
Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't pretend
> now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take it up
> with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around with
> "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
>
> You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty? Reagan
> isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive, degenerative
> brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
>
> Earle
Federally, we kill twelve thousand wolves in Alaska:
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story...-7430177c.html When the
bleeding heart liberal wackos limps come to their senses and protect the
farmer, we'll be doing the same down here!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Earle Horton wrote:
>
> You advocate killing wolves, a federally protected species. Don't pretend
> now that you don't. If you have a problem with the wolf program, take it up
> with your elected representatives. Don't praise people who ride around with
> "Kill Wolves" bumper stickers, shoot at wolves, or poison them.
>
> You can't have a president in a democracy who "follows his conviction
> without regard to the popularity of his decisions", and is honest, or he
> would never be elected in the first place. Don't you value honesty? Reagan
> isn't a good example either. He was a victim of a progressive, degenerative
> brain disease, which almost certainly began while he was in office.
>
> Earle