"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444e3694$0$14946$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> that Nathan is always right.

hey...._you_ said it. :-)


> The reason research is so expensive

is because of pork-barrel spending.


> You hear, what you want to hear. You see,
> what you want to see. And you believe, what you want to believe.

and you think you know something about wolves because you "read a book".
BUWAHAHA! :-)


> You have contradicted yourself several
> times, and you back pedalled on several key issues.

there you go again with your mind wandering. SHOW ME a backpeddle. you
cant.


> You support the laws of
> this country and your state, for example, yet you support those who would
> violently and in secret break those laws.

i FOLLOW the law earle. its perfectly reasonable to FOLLOW the law, and
take comfort in contradiction when those laws conflict with your moral
standards. being a liberal, you wouldnt know to much about moral standards.



> You use the example of one
> private ranch, to disprove that ranchers take welfare.

NONONO! back up earle.....YOU were pitifully trying to tell ME about the
people that _I_ know, and i showed you that you were WRONG. i never spoke a
word about the ranchers i know nothing of. you painted a sweeping picture,
need i quote? i showed you that you were full of ----. im STILL waiting to
hear what government assistance that pryor creek ranch receives earle, since
you said so. what, you read about it in a book? :-)


> What kind of fool would
> I be, if I based all my conclusions on Usenet, as you apparently do?

i havent asked you to base all your conclusions on usenet. ive given you my
first hand knowledge based upon my personal interaction with wolves in
montana. you prefer to believe what you read "in a book". fine earle, its
_your_ ignorance.



> you refuse to recognize, that this is a
> complicated issue.

WRONG! i know its a complicated issue, but for different reasons than you
see. you think the wolf is "pretty" (ok, it _is_ pretty) and thats all you
see. you fail to see that without the wolves ONLY natural predator (man),
an imbalance exists.


> You should learn to recognize when you are whipped.

lol.....when you "whip" me you let me know. :-)


--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:444E4C21.F44D7725@sympatico.ca...
> As I said, you are one gullible fool to believe what you stated and I
> quote: "all 9 of the 911 hijackers came into the country through
> canada."
>
> That statement just plain makes you a first class idiot.
>
> Earle is right

lol...aligning yourself with a fool makes you look like what?

> You also only take the words that only back
> up your statement.

um, no ----.....its a disagreement where you provide what substantiates your
statements, and i do the same. im not going to do your work for you.


> The below snips are from the 'same' web link you provided, and all say
> you are basically full of ---- on this one Nathan.

lol....they show extensive travel from ALL the highjackers.


> They visited lots of other countries too.

certainly! i never suggested otherwise. i only gave you a couple quick
snippets to give you an idea of your own ignorance. all 9 have documented
passes from canada into the united states, and this was my only statement in
response to securing the canadian border as well as the mexican. perhaps
ill dig up some more links after you waller in your ignorance a little
longer and gloat in your false victory. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:444E4C21.F44D7725@sympatico.ca...
> As I said, you are one gullible fool to believe what you stated and I
> quote: "all 9 of the 911 hijackers came into the country through
> canada."
>
> That statement just plain makes you a first class idiot.
>
> Earle is right

lol...aligning yourself with a fool makes you look like what?

> You also only take the words that only back
> up your statement.

um, no ----.....its a disagreement where you provide what substantiates your
statements, and i do the same. im not going to do your work for you.


> The below snips are from the 'same' web link you provided, and all say
> you are basically full of ---- on this one Nathan.

lol....they show extensive travel from ALL the highjackers.


> They visited lots of other countries too.

certainly! i never suggested otherwise. i only gave you a couple quick
snippets to give you an idea of your own ignorance. all 9 have documented
passes from canada into the united states, and this was my only statement in
response to securing the canadian border as well as the mexican. perhaps
ill dig up some more links after you waller in your ignorance a little
longer and gloat in your false victory. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:444E4C21.F44D7725@sympatico.ca...
> As I said, you are one gullible fool to believe what you stated and I
> quote: "all 9 of the 911 hijackers came into the country through
> canada."
>
> That statement just plain makes you a first class idiot.
>
> Earle is right

lol...aligning yourself with a fool makes you look like what?

> You also only take the words that only back
> up your statement.

um, no ----.....its a disagreement where you provide what substantiates your
statements, and i do the same. im not going to do your work for you.


> The below snips are from the 'same' web link you provided, and all say
> you are basically full of ---- on this one Nathan.

lol....they show extensive travel from ALL the highjackers.


> They visited lots of other countries too.

certainly! i never suggested otherwise. i only gave you a couple quick
snippets to give you an idea of your own ignorance. all 9 have documented
passes from canada into the united states, and this was my only statement in
response to securing the canadian border as well as the mexican. perhaps
ill dig up some more links after you waller in your ignorance a little
longer and gloat in your false victory. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

I am going to drop this thread. I am obviously and hopelessly outgunned
here. I will just quit, while I have a shred of dignity left. I'll be back
after I sharpen my wits a bit. (Don't read books. That's the way to be
smart. Uh-huh.)

Earle

"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:SPB3g.102$z_.17101@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444e3694$0$14946$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > that Nathan is always right.
>
> hey...._you_ said it. :-)
>
>
> > The reason research is so expensive
>
> is because of pork-barrel spending.
>
>
> > You hear, what you want to hear. You see,
> > what you want to see. And you believe, what you want to believe.
>
> and you think you know something about wolves because you "read a book".
> BUWAHAHA! :-)
>
>
> > You have contradicted yourself several
> > times, and you back pedalled on several key issues.
>
> there you go again with your mind wandering. SHOW ME a backpeddle. you
> cant.
>
>
> > You support the laws of
> > this country and your state, for example, yet you support those who
would
> > violently and in secret break those laws.
>
> i FOLLOW the law earle. its perfectly reasonable to FOLLOW the law, and
> take comfort in contradiction when those laws conflict with your moral
> standards. being a liberal, you wouldnt know to much about moral
standards.
>
>
>
> > You use the example of one
> > private ranch, to disprove that ranchers take welfare.
>
> NONONO! back up earle.....YOU were pitifully trying to tell ME about the
> people that _I_ know, and i showed you that you were WRONG. i never spoke
a
> word about the ranchers i know nothing of. you painted a sweeping
picture,
> need i quote? i showed you that you were full of ----. im STILL waiting
to
> hear what government assistance that pryor creek ranch receives earle,
since
> you said so. what, you read about it in a book? :-)
>
>
> > What kind of fool would
> > I be, if I based all my conclusions on Usenet, as you apparently do?
>
> i havent asked you to base all your conclusions on usenet. ive given you
my
> first hand knowledge based upon my personal interaction with wolves in
> montana. you prefer to believe what you read "in a book". fine earle,
its
> _your_ ignorance.
>
>
>
> > you refuse to recognize, that this is a
> > complicated issue.
>
> WRONG! i know its a complicated issue, but for different reasons than you
> see. you think the wolf is "pretty" (ok, it _is_ pretty) and thats all
you
> see. you fail to see that without the wolves ONLY natural predator (man),
> an imbalance exists.
>
>
> > You should learn to recognize when you are whipped.
>
> lol.....when you "whip" me you let me know. :-)
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>

 

I am going to drop this thread. I am obviously and hopelessly outgunned
here. I will just quit, while I have a shred of dignity left. I'll be back
after I sharpen my wits a bit. (Don't read books. That's the way to be
smart. Uh-huh.)

Earle

"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:SPB3g.102$z_.17101@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444e3694$0$14946$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > that Nathan is always right.
>
> hey...._you_ said it. :-)
>
>
> > The reason research is so expensive
>
> is because of pork-barrel spending.
>
>
> > You hear, what you want to hear. You see,
> > what you want to see. And you believe, what you want to believe.
>
> and you think you know something about wolves because you "read a book".
> BUWAHAHA! :-)
>
>
> > You have contradicted yourself several
> > times, and you back pedalled on several key issues.
>
> there you go again with your mind wandering. SHOW ME a backpeddle. you
> cant.
>
>
> > You support the laws of
> > this country and your state, for example, yet you support those who
would
> > violently and in secret break those laws.
>
> i FOLLOW the law earle. its perfectly reasonable to FOLLOW the law, and
> take comfort in contradiction when those laws conflict with your moral
> standards. being a liberal, you wouldnt know to much about moral
standards.
>
>
>
> > You use the example of one
> > private ranch, to disprove that ranchers take welfare.
>
> NONONO! back up earle.....YOU were pitifully trying to tell ME about the
> people that _I_ know, and i showed you that you were WRONG. i never spoke
a
> word about the ranchers i know nothing of. you painted a sweeping
picture,
> need i quote? i showed you that you were full of ----. im STILL waiting
to
> hear what government assistance that pryor creek ranch receives earle,
since
> you said so. what, you read about it in a book? :-)
>
>
> > What kind of fool would
> > I be, if I based all my conclusions on Usenet, as you apparently do?
>
> i havent asked you to base all your conclusions on usenet. ive given you
my
> first hand knowledge based upon my personal interaction with wolves in
> montana. you prefer to believe what you read "in a book". fine earle,
its
> _your_ ignorance.
>
>
>
> > you refuse to recognize, that this is a
> > complicated issue.
>
> WRONG! i know its a complicated issue, but for different reasons than you
> see. you think the wolf is "pretty" (ok, it _is_ pretty) and thats all
you
> see. you fail to see that without the wolves ONLY natural predator (man),
> an imbalance exists.
>
>
> > You should learn to recognize when you are whipped.
>
> lol.....when you "whip" me you let me know. :-)
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>

 

I am going to drop this thread. I am obviously and hopelessly outgunned
here. I will just quit, while I have a shred of dignity left. I'll be back
after I sharpen my wits a bit. (Don't read books. That's the way to be
smart. Uh-huh.)

Earle

"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:SPB3g.102$z_.17101@news.uswest.net...
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:444e3694$0$14946$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> > that Nathan is always right.
>
> hey...._you_ said it. :-)
>
>
> > The reason research is so expensive
>
> is because of pork-barrel spending.
>
>
> > You hear, what you want to hear. You see,
> > what you want to see. And you believe, what you want to believe.
>
> and you think you know something about wolves because you "read a book".
> BUWAHAHA! :-)
>
>
> > You have contradicted yourself several
> > times, and you back pedalled on several key issues.
>
> there you go again with your mind wandering. SHOW ME a backpeddle. you
> cant.
>
>
> > You support the laws of
> > this country and your state, for example, yet you support those who
would
> > violently and in secret break those laws.
>
> i FOLLOW the law earle. its perfectly reasonable to FOLLOW the law, and
> take comfort in contradiction when those laws conflict with your moral
> standards. being a liberal, you wouldnt know to much about moral
standards.
>
>
>
> > You use the example of one
> > private ranch, to disprove that ranchers take welfare.
>
> NONONO! back up earle.....YOU were pitifully trying to tell ME about the
> people that _I_ know, and i showed you that you were WRONG. i never spoke
a
> word about the ranchers i know nothing of. you painted a sweeping
picture,
> need i quote? i showed you that you were full of ----. im STILL waiting
to
> hear what government assistance that pryor creek ranch receives earle,
since
> you said so. what, you read about it in a book? :-)
>
>
> > What kind of fool would
> > I be, if I based all my conclusions on Usenet, as you apparently do?
>
> i havent asked you to base all your conclusions on usenet. ive given you
my
> first hand knowledge based upon my personal interaction with wolves in
> montana. you prefer to believe what you read "in a book". fine earle,
its
> _your_ ignorance.
>
>
>
> > you refuse to recognize, that this is a
> > complicated issue.
>
> WRONG! i know its a complicated issue, but for different reasons than you
> see. you think the wolf is "pretty" (ok, it _is_ pretty) and thats all
you
> see. you fail to see that without the wolves ONLY natural predator (man),
> an imbalance exists.
>
>
> > You should learn to recognize when you are whipped.
>
> lol.....when you "whip" me you let me know. :-)
>
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
>

 

"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444eee1d$0$14917$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I'll be back
> after I sharpen my wits a bit.

take a montana vacation earle. come see for yourself, then combine your
first hand experience with what youve read and draw your final conclusion.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444eee1d$0$14917$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I'll be back
> after I sharpen my wits a bit.

take a montana vacation earle. come see for yourself, then combine your
first hand experience with what youve read and draw your final conclusion.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

 

"Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote in message
news:444eee1d$0$14917$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.c om...
> I'll be back
> after I sharpen my wits a bit.

take a montana vacation earle. come see for yourself, then combine your
first hand experience with what youve read and draw your final conclusion.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com