Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:K6adndqh64CEBdDZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm

i CLEARLY asked you for written law to substantiate your own statement.
that is NOT written law. that is one reporters interpretation of law.


> Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for
> each time it's found:

lol im only clarifying so that you can prove the statements you made.


> Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
> Clinton proud.

the law is very specific, this is why i have asked you to quote it. bottom
line, YOU CANT FIND APPLICABLE WRITTEN LAW TO SUBTANTIATE YOUR STATEMENT.


> (sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
> word.

YOU labelled me criminal, and now you cannot support your own
statement........if you could you would have. either quote written law
applicable at the time i made the statement you quoted (YOU chose what
statement to quote to try to call me out on), or have the integrity to admit
that you were wrong.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:K6adndqh64CEBdDZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm

i CLEARLY asked you for written law to substantiate your own statement.
that is NOT written law. that is one reporters interpretation of law.


> Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for
> each time it's found:

lol im only clarifying so that you can prove the statements you made.


> Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
> Clinton proud.

the law is very specific, this is why i have asked you to quote it. bottom
line, YOU CANT FIND APPLICABLE WRITTEN LAW TO SUBTANTIATE YOUR STATEMENT.


> (sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
> word.

YOU labelled me criminal, and now you cannot support your own
statement........if you could you would have. either quote written law
applicable at the time i made the statement you quoted (YOU chose what
statement to quote to try to call me out on), or have the integrity to admit
that you were wrong.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:K6adndqh64CEBdDZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
>I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm

i CLEARLY asked you for written law to substantiate your own statement.
that is NOT written law. that is one reporters interpretation of law.


> Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for
> each time it's found:

lol im only clarifying so that you can prove the statements you made.


> Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
> Clinton proud.

the law is very specific, this is why i have asked you to quote it. bottom
line, YOU CANT FIND APPLICABLE WRITTEN LAW TO SUBTANTIATE YOUR STATEMENT.


> (sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
> word.

YOU labelled me criminal, and now you cannot support your own
statement........if you could you would have. either quote written law
applicable at the time i made the statement you quoted (YOU chose what
statement to quote to try to call me out on), or have the integrity to admit
that you were wrong.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

Fortunately these were sold out for Christmas:
http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=hcvrD3n-mVXplD2zD47hBDbyk2DVamC2gCo=?CategoryName=pa_flash Memory&ProductSKU=NWE505BLUE&Dept=audio&INT=sstyle-audio-deptfeature-NWE505BLUE|sstyle:sy_dept_content_b:audio
And I didn't want to buy Japanese anyway.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> I put a Gigabyte of songs, all legal by "fair use doctrine", on an mp3
> player. Then I plug it into the cassette player in my Wrangler.
>
> Earle

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

Fortunately these were sold out for Christmas:
http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=hcvrD3n-mVXplD2zD47hBDbyk2DVamC2gCo=?CategoryName=pa_flash Memory&ProductSKU=NWE505BLUE&Dept=audio&INT=sstyle-audio-deptfeature-NWE505BLUE|sstyle:sy_dept_content_b:audio
And I didn't want to buy Japanese anyway.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> I put a Gigabyte of songs, all legal by "fair use doctrine", on an mp3
> player. Then I plug it into the cassette player in my Wrangler.
>
> Earle

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

Fortunately these were sold out for Christmas:
http://www.sonystyle.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/eCS/Store/en/-/USD/SY_DisplayProductInformation-Start;sid=hcvrD3n-mVXplD2zD47hBDbyk2DVamC2gCo=?CategoryName=pa_flash Memory&ProductSKU=NWE505BLUE&Dept=audio&INT=sstyle-audio-deptfeature-NWE505BLUE|sstyle:sy_dept_content_b:audio
And I didn't want to buy Japanese anyway.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Earle Horton wrote:
>
> I put a Gigabyte of songs, all legal by "fair use doctrine", on an mp3
> player. Then I plug it into the cassette player in my Wrangler.
>
> Earle

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:444DABBB.6C953837@cox.net...
> People go to Hell for lying.

That would be the the "Hell" located a couple miles east of Desert Center,
CA, (around mile marker 198 on I-10) right?
N33 41.455 W115 16.362

--
N581 -- AA5A -- AXH
http://www.narcosis-republic.us

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:444DABBB.6C953837@cox.net...
> People go to Hell for lying.

That would be the the "Hell" located a couple miles east of Desert Center,
CA, (around mile marker 198 on I-10) right?
N33 41.455 W115 16.362

--
N581 -- AA5A -- AXH
http://www.narcosis-republic.us

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:444DABBB.6C953837@cox.net...
> People go to Hell for lying.

That would be the the "Hell" located a couple miles east of Desert Center,
CA, (around mile marker 198 on I-10) right?
N33 41.455 W115 16.362

--
N581 -- AA5A -- AXH
http://www.narcosis-republic.us

Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
 

"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:a9OdnU8MdZ_uDtDZnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Nope, I still buy my CD's.

Personally, I buy my CDs and then burn a copy to put in my vehicle... Same
philosophy with DVDs... My daughter *never* gets to view the original, only
a copy that I make for her... That way, if she screws it up, I'm only out a
bit of time and the $0.21 that the blank DVD cost me... Better than being
out the $15+ for the original master copy... Of course, I can also remaster
the DVD and take out any section that I do not believe are appropriate for a
12-yr old... Or 11-yr old... Whatever... Damn, for some reason, Grace thinks
that I should be able to remember these things...