Pink Kate
04-24-2006, 10:50 PM
#1061
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
> infringement, which is illegal.
downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that was
in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
04-24-2006, 11:01 PM
#1062
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:01 PM
#1063
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:01 PM
#1064
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there is
> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later VHS
> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it was
> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of the
> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties to
> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and Bill
> Maher.
>
> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without permission
> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs like
> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement, which
> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:11 PM
#1065
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Nope, I still buy my CD's.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:11 PM
#1066
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Nope, I still buy my CD's.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:11 PM
#1067
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
Nope, I still buy my CD's.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:444D90FB.A0C66CEA@***.net...
> And so do I, now if this group would keep from irritating me long
> enough to watch an episode: http://www.----------.com/temp/tivo.jpg And
> of course you don't burn CDs for your truck.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> There are limited fair use issues, I believe the consensus is you there
>> is
>> implied permission for recording broadcasts for personal use but the
>> broadcasters don't really like it. When blank cassette tapes and later
>> VHS
>> tapes became popular, the recording/movie industries were afraid that it
>> was
>> so easy to make copies infringement would be wide------, so a portion of
>> the
>> proceeds from the sale of blank cassettes & videotapes goes to royalties
>> to
>> offset possible infringement. I imagine part ot Tivo sale proceeds go to
>> these as well...we have 2 Tivos and that's how I watch the Sopranos and
>> Bill
>> Maher.
>>
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission
>> and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing programs
>> like
>> the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright infringement,
>> which
>> is illegal.
04-24-2006, 11:31 PM
#1068
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm which
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
04-24-2006, 11:31 PM
#1069
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm which
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
04-24-2006, 11:31 PM
#1070
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
I already posted http://mp3.about.com/od/isitlegal/a/riaalawsuits.htm which
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
you dismissed as " a reporter's interpretation." I guess since the reporter
was never sued by a big auto company, he must not know anything about
copyright law, and it must make you an expert.
Funny how you get more and more specific about what you were asking for each
time it's found:
" ive stated that i do not break written law." Oops.
"we arent discussing trademak law. we are discussing CRIMINAL law. " Oops
again.
"show me any case anywhere that a person was prosecuted for downloading
music." Damn.
"downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. " Maybe
that'll fly.
"please quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music
that was
in place at the time." There, that's got him!
Your legal squirming and hyperspecific definitions of legality would make
Clinton proud.
(sigh) You'll see only what you want to. Knock yourself out with the last
word.
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:99g3g.102$qe.17835@news.uswest.net...
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:loydnXTNXsWl8tDZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> But if you intend to obtain a copy of a copyrighted work without
>> permission and without paying for it, as Nathan's beloved P2P filesharing
>> programs like the original incarnation of Napster did, it's copyright
>> infringement, which is illegal.
>
> downloading a copy and uploading are totally different issues. now please
> quote applicable written law specifically against downloading music that
> was in place at the time i made the statement that you quoted.
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
