Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
10-30-2005, 06:03 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I know Bill, I was just quarreling with the photo, a jab in good humor and
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK
10-30-2005, 06:07 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
10-30-2005, 06:07 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
10-30-2005, 06:07 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
off.
It's the ounpkin that looks like the tire up on the bank but the XJ still
has one wheel off the gound too.
I wonder how all of them would fare, given the exact same angle and
placement.
It's up on the ba
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
: bottom of the ravine.
:
: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
: >
: > Hi Kate,
: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
: >
: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: > >
: > > Hey!
: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > > I think my favorite is
: > >
: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > > close.
: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
the p/s
: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: > >
: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
this is a
: > > trick photo. So there!
: > >
: > > KJK
10-30-2005, 06:18 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:6lc9f.19131$_31.499@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
:I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
: off.
: It's the ounpkin
PUMPKIN dang it PUMPKIN...
sheesh
: "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
: news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
:: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
:: bottom of the ravine.
::
:: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
:: >
:: > Hi Kate,
:: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
:: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
:: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
:: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
:: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:: >
:: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
:: > >
:: > > Hey!
:: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
: there!
:: > > I think my favorite is
:: > >
:: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
: real
:: > > close.
:: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ
is
: up on
:: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
: down in
:: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
:: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
: the p/s
:: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has
a
:: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
:: > >
:: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
: this is a
:: > > trick photo. So there!
:: > >
:: > > KJK
:
:
10-30-2005, 06:18 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:6lc9f.19131$_31.499@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
:I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
: off.
: It's the ounpkin
PUMPKIN dang it PUMPKIN...
sheesh
: "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
: news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
:: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
:: bottom of the ravine.
::
:: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
:: >
:: > Hi Kate,
:: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
:: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
:: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
:: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
:: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:: >
:: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
:: > >
:: > > Hey!
:: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
: there!
:: > > I think my favorite is
:: > >
:: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
: real
:: > > close.
:: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ
is
: up on
:: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
: down in
:: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
:: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
: the p/s
:: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has
a
:: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
:: > >
:: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
: this is a
:: > > trick photo. So there!
:: > >
:: > > KJK
:
:
10-30-2005, 06:18 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
"KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
news:6lc9f.19131$_31.499@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
:I looked again, it looks as though you'r eright but the angles are still
: off.
: It's the ounpkin
PUMPKIN dang it PUMPKIN...
sheesh
: "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
: news:43653C2D.514DAC8C@***.net...
:: Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
:: bottom of the ravine.
::
:: "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
:: >
:: > Hi Kate,
:: > Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
:: > travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
:: > length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
:: > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
:: > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:: >
:: > "KJ.Kate" wrote:
:: > >
:: > > Hey!
:: > > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
: there!
:: > > I think my favorite is
:: > >
:: > > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
: real
:: > > close.
:: > > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ
is
: up on
:: > > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
: down in
:: > > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
:: > > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with
: the p/s
:: > > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has
a
:: > > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
:: > >
:: > > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT
: this is a
:: > > trick photo. So there!
:: > >
:: > > KJK
:
:
11-02-2005, 09:13 AM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I would have to say my favorite is the .44 mag shifter. But then I am a
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>
11-02-2005, 09:13 AM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I would have to say my favorite is the .44 mag shifter. But then I am a
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>
11-02-2005, 09:13 AM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I would have to say my favorite is the .44 mag shifter. But then I am a
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>
little bias as it is in my Jeep. Glad you liked it enough to post it in
your album. Lot of good pic's in there.
"Billy Ray" <Billy_Ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:6ce20$4364f280$4831b233$15987@FUSE.NET...
> I saw the photo wasn't exactly fair also when I got it from the other
Bill.
>
> Which are your favorites? I added a few new ones yesterday
>
> --
> Billy_Ray@SPAM.fuse.net (remove SPAM)
> 2002 Jeep WJ 4 Liter Automatic
> Sharing is why we are all here....... or should be.
> .
> "KJ.Kate" <KJ.Kate@WhoseHotMail.com> wrote in message
> news:Bz39f.26927$x6.21655@bignews6.bellsouth.net.. .
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
> > there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up
> > on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down
> > in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
> > p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is
> > a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
> >
> >
>
>