Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
Hi Kate,
Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
Hi Kate,
Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
Put on your glasses and look again the XJ's rear tire is in the
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
bottom of the ravine.
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> Hi Kate,
> Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
> travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
> length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "KJ.Kate" wrote:
> >
> > Hey!
> > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> > I think my favorite is
> >
> > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> > close.
> > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
> >
> > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> > trick photo. So there!
> >
> > KJK
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
It isn't a trick photo from what I have seen. I have photos of both
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
It isn't a trick photo from what I have seen. I have photos of both
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
It isn't a trick photo from what I have seen. I have photos of both
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
XJ's and TJ's hangin' 1 or teeter totering on 2 like that.
Bill's photo is just showing the axle droop difference. The KJ could
come down really hard if the driver isn't really careful! Then so could
the XJ when up that far....
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Aug./05 http://www.imagestation.com/album/in...?id=2120343242
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
"KJ.Kate" wrote:
>
> Hey!
> I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in there!
> I think my favorite is
>
> I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it real
> close.
> Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is up on
> the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way down in
> the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
> Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the p/s
> front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
> longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
>
> I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this is a
> trick photo. So there!
>
> KJK
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I know Bill, I was just quarreling with the photo, a jab in good humor and
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Ping: Billy Ray - XJ vs KJ photo
I know Bill, I was just quarreling with the photo, a jab in good humor and
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK
all that.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43653564.94B4EFBD@***.net...
: Hi Kate,
: Jack your car up and you will see you have only four inches of
: travel, any straight axles has at least double that in their stock
: length shock absorbers: http://www.----------.com/XJversusKJ.jpg
: God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
: mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
:
: "KJ.Kate" wrote:
: >
: > Hey!
: > I was just cruising through your photo album, lots of good giggles in
there!
: > I think my favorite is
: >
: > I just came across the one titled "nuff said" again, and looked at it
real
: > close.
: > Even with my glasses off I can see that the d/s rear tire on the XJ is
up on
: > the bank of the ditch, and the KJ has it's d/s rear tire all the way
down in
: > the bottom of the ditch nearly started up the next side..
: > Also noted is that the XJ is not making contact with the ground with the
p/s
: > front tire, only by inches but it still isn't touching . It also has a
: > longer wheel base that allows it to reach further across the ditch.
: >
: > I see what a difference in articulation there is, it's extreme BUT this
is a
: > trick photo. So there!
: >
: > KJK