OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
#361
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Argo and other 6-8 wheeled ATV capabilities was Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 23:54:23 -0400, "Paul Keating"
<pkeating@nospam.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>When I was a little younger, my uncle had an 8 wheel Argo we used for
>hunting, back in Newfoundland. Great rig to get just about anywhere,
>especially with steep hills and lots of bog and ponds.....drop a couple of
>ducks or geese in a pond, and just run right out and pick them up. I've
>driven that rig up hills that a J5 (bulldozer style tracked vehicle) had
>to winch up....the center of gravity is so slow, it's just about
>impossible to flip, and they will claw their way to the top of anything
>that doesn't flip em.....we had the tracks for it as well....amazing in
>the snow, even with 2 guys and a 1000 pound moose on board.
I did some checking out of the Argo's. They have a new one now that is
a 6x6 but with the big engine so it'll go about 35mph.
These are far from Cheap tho. Much more money than a Quad or a Rhino.
If these ever flipped you'd be hurting. They really seem to need the
tracks when clawing their way out of the water if it's at all steep.
Every place I've seen these in pics has been in areas that are not all
tha bad. Nothing really steep and fairly flat ground. They have about
8 inches of ground clearance. I don't know what you'd ever do if you
high centered one of these esp the 8x8's.
I sure wouldn't mind taking one out for a day and really putting it
through some tough stuff.
I guess it depends on the terrain that you have lightly wooded fairly
flat land with a lot of bogs and ponds seen to be the Argo's forte.
I haven't seen it go through any real heavy duty mud either but the
Quads can I wonder how these would do. If you ever got it stuck, it
would really be stuck, probably worse than a Quad which displaces less
mud.
>On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:38:26 +0000, Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>>>I use the machine only for hunting season in the Calabogie Ontario Area.
>>>Mike Romain kinda knows the area as it in the same general area he
>>>wheels in the fall.
<pkeating@nospam.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>When I was a little younger, my uncle had an 8 wheel Argo we used for
>hunting, back in Newfoundland. Great rig to get just about anywhere,
>especially with steep hills and lots of bog and ponds.....drop a couple of
>ducks or geese in a pond, and just run right out and pick them up. I've
>driven that rig up hills that a J5 (bulldozer style tracked vehicle) had
>to winch up....the center of gravity is so slow, it's just about
>impossible to flip, and they will claw their way to the top of anything
>that doesn't flip em.....we had the tracks for it as well....amazing in
>the snow, even with 2 guys and a 1000 pound moose on board.
I did some checking out of the Argo's. They have a new one now that is
a 6x6 but with the big engine so it'll go about 35mph.
These are far from Cheap tho. Much more money than a Quad or a Rhino.
If these ever flipped you'd be hurting. They really seem to need the
tracks when clawing their way out of the water if it's at all steep.
Every place I've seen these in pics has been in areas that are not all
tha bad. Nothing really steep and fairly flat ground. They have about
8 inches of ground clearance. I don't know what you'd ever do if you
high centered one of these esp the 8x8's.
I sure wouldn't mind taking one out for a day and really putting it
through some tough stuff.
I guess it depends on the terrain that you have lightly wooded fairly
flat land with a lot of bogs and ponds seen to be the Argo's forte.
I haven't seen it go through any real heavy duty mud either but the
Quads can I wonder how these would do. If you ever got it stuck, it
would really be stuck, probably worse than a Quad which displaces less
mud.
>On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 21:38:26 +0000, Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>>>I use the machine only for hunting season in the Calabogie Ontario Area.
>>>Mike Romain kinda knows the area as it in the same general area he
>>>wheels in the fall.
#362
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Argo and other 6-8 wheeled ATV capabilities was Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Thanks for that full review of the Argo, Jason. I really appreciate
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
#363
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Argo and other 6-8 wheeled ATV capabilities was Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Thanks for that full review of the Argo, Jason. I really appreciate
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
#364
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Argo and other 6-8 wheeled ATV capabilities was Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Thanks for that full review of the Argo, Jason. I really appreciate
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
it. I might try out an Argo at some point but it's real strong point
seems to be the fact that it can float. Freeboard was the term I was
looking for and there is precious little of it. I watched a lot of
videos of the Argos and it looks like it's real strong points are in
swampy areas.
Nathan sent me pics of the places he rides and there is just no way an
Argo could traverse stuff like that.
still the Argo does look like a fun toy to play with in the right
enviroment.
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 10:03:45 -0700, Jason Killian
<jkillian@coas.oregonstate.edu> wrote:
>Drive an ARGO 6x6 Bigfoot every day for work, customed to run RTK-GPS
>equipment for beach and dune surveys (read Heavy Duty roll cage bolted to
>the steel ladder frame and fog and search lights, etc). We haven't rolled
>it yet, but it's been amazingly close a couple times.
>
>It definately has a top speed in the low to mid-twenties, but to be
>completely honest, that speed is pretty much the most I'd ever give it.
>With no suspension other than the bounch in 4psi tires, even a 2-inch
>drainage channel on the beach will smack your head against the windshield
>if you don't feather the throttle right. (Never mind the foot deep scour
>hole I found a couple weeks ago which launched the whole thing into the
>air)
>
>As for wether or not it will chew through real mud, i have my doubts. It
>has no problem with sand, even dry fluffy stuff, and i've only seen it
>stuck once (co-worker got it centered on the ridge of a dune with the
>wheels hanging on either side). But if you lost forward motion and sat the
>body down on some thick mud, i think you'd have the same problem as with
>every other vehicle.
>
>Now the fun one - it has very little freeboard. I think it will float
>longer than the engine will run, but I've never tested this theory. I've
>crossed small tidal lagoons with it, even before the roll cage, and you
>only have about 5 inches of freeboard. Anything with chop or real waves
>and you're in trouble.
>
>So...
>
>What's wrong:
>
>Low clearance
>No Suspension
>Could use a bit more power in low range, but the speed's ok.
>Weak Alternator
>Low Freeboard
>Press-In Grease Nipples (pulled one out with the gun this morning)
>
>What's right:
>
>Amphibious
>Easy to drive
>Hauls a ton of stuff
>Pretty Low Maintenance (We flush the body out after each survey and
>re-grease because of sand, but I think we go a bit overkill. Grease is
>cheaper than metal though...)
#365
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:33:44 GMT, "Dave Milne"
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
#366
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:33:44 GMT, "Dave Milne"
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
#367
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:33:44 GMT, "Dave Milne"
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
<jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
>I had a fair old laugh about the Jeep sticker that warns "this vehicle
>doesn't handle like a car". Its so f*k*g obvious.
Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
When the snow hits all the SUV's end up in the ditches on teh side of
the road or piled up into other cars.
I don't know what Sport they were thinking of when they bought their
Sport Utility Vehicle but it clearly wasn't a Sports Car.
So far my fav is the one that says the airbags can kill you.
>
>Dave Milne, Scotland
>'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:pa9hpv0vr3g1l5n40m7ksutil4ehip6t83@4ax.com.. .
>: On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 03:41:28 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>: <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>: Now we have to have cofee cups that say
>: WARNING!!! COFFEE IS HOT!!!
>
#368
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Most Corvettes handled like trucks until the mid 80s :-)
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
#369
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Most Corvettes handled like trucks until the mid 80s :-)
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
#370
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT wifey amazes me AGAIN
Most Corvettes handled like trucks until the mid 80s :-)
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!
[ducks]
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
: Although you should see the way people drive trucks around here.
: You'd think they were driving Corvettes!