Scooby Don't wrote:

> I suppose the outboard would be a big help on large ponds but where
> would you stow it afterwards? a 9.9 HP is not all that small and would
> require a 5 gallon gas tank as well.
> Probably if you were riding solo or got the 4 seater 8 wheel model you
> could toss it in the back.

It's got a outboard motor mount just lift it :-)
I use an electric motor to cross the lake, works perfect.

>
>>>Well what I really meant was it does not look like it has a lot of
>>>articulation in the wheels to go up and over some of the rougher
>>>stuff.
>>
>>Look closely it's got a extra wheel "in the middle" :-)
>>unlike a Quad or Jeep
>
>
> I meant the kind of Rocks that Nathan regulary rides which he has some
> pics of where he takes his Quad. I don't think I could handle terrain
> that's that severe but his Quad will do it.
>
>
>>>To me it basically looks like a variant of the M29 weasel which was
>>>also amphibious but the Weasel had a problem in that while it could
>>>chew through stuff that would kill a jeep it has metal tracks and was
>>>a pain to drive with a 3 spd manual studebaker tranny.
>>>I'd love to seea video of you putting it through it's paces. I won't
>>>ever be able to ride a Quad agaid so the Rhino is looking mighty good
>>>and I'll be interested to see what Nathan says about it's
>>>capabilities.
>>>The Argo's can only go 24 mph or so. I guess there is another company
>>>out there that makes a similar ATV to the Argo but it has up to 8
>>>driving wheels and is amphibious.
>>
>>Argos also make an 8 wheeler. There is another company that makes
>>a machine similar "Max" I believe is the name of it.
>
>
> I've seen the pics of the 8x8's and the T-Max or whatever it's called.
> They look kinda fun to play with but I would want more speed.
> The M29 would cost you about $10K for a decent one and it's not in the
> same league as anything else. You'd need a decent Full sized pickup to
> tow it. unlike the Argo or any Quad. The M29 weighs like 3,000 lbs.!!
> Still I'd like like to bomb around in an argo for a day.
>
>
>>Tracks are only needed for floatation on the snow. The 6x6 drive
>>has a LOT of traction.
>
>
> Have you see what the Rhino can climb tho? I guess when it comes time
> for me to buy one I'll try them all out and see which one I like the
> best. I'd just grab an M29 if I had a local mechanic who could work on
> Studebaker engines.

If you ever make it around here I'll gladly take ya for a spin.
All it took was one test drive at the dealer to sell me.
Like I said somewhere I was looking to buy a Quad
He did have one heck of a testing ground though.

>
>>>Quads are fast and it would be nice if they could double the speed on
>>
>>I wouldn't recommend making it faster. I think it's too fast in the bush
>>already
>
>
> Why is it unstable at higher speeds?

No but in the bush you just can't go that fast, in anything. On a trail,
well that's a different story
>
>>>Is teh only reason the Quad can't make it up to you camp is because of
>>>deep standing water?
>>
>>No No cars can make it to the camp. But getting to the field were the
>>deer dropped That's where it truly shines. My hunting buddy's love
>>the machine as they never have to drag deer out of the bush again.
>
>
> Well you said Quads couldn't make it to the camp. The only reason
> would be if you needed to float over small ponds to get there.
> I've seen Quads around here dragging out deer. They seed teh area with
> apples from the orchard then when hunting season comes they get into a
> good position and wait with the Quad waiting nearby.

No I said "at" the camp, We are lucky enough to have around 1000 acres
of rough bush land filled with swamps, small lakes, beaver ponds,
streams and ridges. And just only three hunters (to date).

>
>
>>Understood, this machine is unique and a lot of people can't visualize
>>what this machine can actually do (with the right operator of coarse)
>
>
> Well it has 6 wheels but it's Tub design also has some drawbacks.
> No ATV is perfect tho. The Argo looks like it would be tough to roll
> but I don't know how steep a hill it can tackle.
>

Argo says 30 degrees

>
>>Truthfully the argo (to me anyways) is a piece of hunting equipment
>>not a toy It sits in storage most of the year to be pulled out
>>at the start of small game season. Then after deer back in storage.
>>My Nephew use to bug me all the time to rip around in it (which I
>>kinda disliked) Whew thankfully his fricken Dad bought him a dirt bike.
>>Took a lot off pressure off the Argo.
>
>
> The Argo is quite expensive but I would want to use it more than a
> couple of months out of the year.
> I guess i prefer Toys. :)

Not really, priced about the same as any atv. One thing I really
like about it, is (here in Ontario Canada anyway) that it does not
need a license plate or insurance by law, no helmet also. I do have
liability and fire/theft on it just in case. but it's pretty cheap
compared to my Ski Doo for example. (Snowmobiling is going to be insured
out of existence eventually. A lot of insurance companies dropped sleds
all together)


>
>
>>My Ski Doo is my real toy
>
>
> I still don't know if I can handle the seating position for hours upon
> hours of riding. No way would I get an Elite even if I could afford
> it.
> I'll have to rent later on in the year. I've only seen Artic Cats for
> rent tho.
>
Too bad about Cats only. I haven't ridden one yet, but them new Ski Doo
Revs apparently are the greatest thing since.....well .....you know :-)
But that's a toy that's going to have to wait, my 99MXZ will have to do
for now Hey got 10,000km on it so far, Can't wait for snow :-)

 

Scooby Don't wrote:

> I suppose the outboard would be a big help on large ponds but where
> would you stow it afterwards? a 9.9 HP is not all that small and would
> require a 5 gallon gas tank as well.
> Probably if you were riding solo or got the 4 seater 8 wheel model you
> could toss it in the back.

It's got a outboard motor mount just lift it :-)
I use an electric motor to cross the lake, works perfect.

>
>>>Well what I really meant was it does not look like it has a lot of
>>>articulation in the wheels to go up and over some of the rougher
>>>stuff.
>>
>>Look closely it's got a extra wheel "in the middle" :-)
>>unlike a Quad or Jeep
>
>
> I meant the kind of Rocks that Nathan regulary rides which he has some
> pics of where he takes his Quad. I don't think I could handle terrain
> that's that severe but his Quad will do it.
>
>
>>>To me it basically looks like a variant of the M29 weasel which was
>>>also amphibious but the Weasel had a problem in that while it could
>>>chew through stuff that would kill a jeep it has metal tracks and was
>>>a pain to drive with a 3 spd manual studebaker tranny.
>>>I'd love to seea video of you putting it through it's paces. I won't
>>>ever be able to ride a Quad agaid so the Rhino is looking mighty good
>>>and I'll be interested to see what Nathan says about it's
>>>capabilities.
>>>The Argo's can only go 24 mph or so. I guess there is another company
>>>out there that makes a similar ATV to the Argo but it has up to 8
>>>driving wheels and is amphibious.
>>
>>Argos also make an 8 wheeler. There is another company that makes
>>a machine similar "Max" I believe is the name of it.
>
>
> I've seen the pics of the 8x8's and the T-Max or whatever it's called.
> They look kinda fun to play with but I would want more speed.
> The M29 would cost you about $10K for a decent one and it's not in the
> same league as anything else. You'd need a decent Full sized pickup to
> tow it. unlike the Argo or any Quad. The M29 weighs like 3,000 lbs.!!
> Still I'd like like to bomb around in an argo for a day.
>
>
>>Tracks are only needed for floatation on the snow. The 6x6 drive
>>has a LOT of traction.
>
>
> Have you see what the Rhino can climb tho? I guess when it comes time
> for me to buy one I'll try them all out and see which one I like the
> best. I'd just grab an M29 if I had a local mechanic who could work on
> Studebaker engines.

If you ever make it around here I'll gladly take ya for a spin.
All it took was one test drive at the dealer to sell me.
Like I said somewhere I was looking to buy a Quad
He did have one heck of a testing ground though.

>
>>>Quads are fast and it would be nice if they could double the speed on
>>
>>I wouldn't recommend making it faster. I think it's too fast in the bush
>>already
>
>
> Why is it unstable at higher speeds?

No but in the bush you just can't go that fast, in anything. On a trail,
well that's a different story
>
>>>Is teh only reason the Quad can't make it up to you camp is because of
>>>deep standing water?
>>
>>No No cars can make it to the camp. But getting to the field were the
>>deer dropped That's where it truly shines. My hunting buddy's love
>>the machine as they never have to drag deer out of the bush again.
>
>
> Well you said Quads couldn't make it to the camp. The only reason
> would be if you needed to float over small ponds to get there.
> I've seen Quads around here dragging out deer. They seed teh area with
> apples from the orchard then when hunting season comes they get into a
> good position and wait with the Quad waiting nearby.

No I said "at" the camp, We are lucky enough to have around 1000 acres
of rough bush land filled with swamps, small lakes, beaver ponds,
streams and ridges. And just only three hunters (to date).

>
>
>>Understood, this machine is unique and a lot of people can't visualize
>>what this machine can actually do (with the right operator of coarse)
>
>
> Well it has 6 wheels but it's Tub design also has some drawbacks.
> No ATV is perfect tho. The Argo looks like it would be tough to roll
> but I don't know how steep a hill it can tackle.
>

Argo says 30 degrees

>
>>Truthfully the argo (to me anyways) is a piece of hunting equipment
>>not a toy It sits in storage most of the year to be pulled out
>>at the start of small game season. Then after deer back in storage.
>>My Nephew use to bug me all the time to rip around in it (which I
>>kinda disliked) Whew thankfully his fricken Dad bought him a dirt bike.
>>Took a lot off pressure off the Argo.
>
>
> The Argo is quite expensive but I would want to use it more than a
> couple of months out of the year.
> I guess i prefer Toys. :)

Not really, priced about the same as any atv. One thing I really
like about it, is (here in Ontario Canada anyway) that it does not
need a license plate or insurance by law, no helmet also. I do have
liability and fire/theft on it just in case. but it's pretty cheap
compared to my Ski Doo for example. (Snowmobiling is going to be insured
out of existence eventually. A lot of insurance companies dropped sleds
all together)


>
>
>>My Ski Doo is my real toy
>
>
> I still don't know if I can handle the seating position for hours upon
> hours of riding. No way would I get an Elite even if I could afford
> it.
> I'll have to rent later on in the year. I've only seen Artic Cats for
> rent tho.
>
Too bad about Cats only. I haven't ridden one yet, but them new Ski Doo
Revs apparently are the greatest thing since.....well .....you know :-)
But that's a toy that's going to have to wait, my 99MXZ will have to do
for now Hey got 10,000km on it so far, Can't wait for snow :-)

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:17:43 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:an8gpv0c91hes2beiggftp0ph6r9bcahqs@4ax.com.. .
>> Nathan it sure sounds like it's a Front Limited Slip to me and not a
>> true Locked 4x4.
>
>no, there is no limited slip on it. when the cams lock it fully locks both
>wheels. the differentiation is between front and rear, not side to side.
>
>> When fully locked all 4 wheels should be moving
>
>when locked, all 4 wheels are pulling.
>
>> and
>> not just 2 then slip in the front then 4 wheels pulling.
>
>in all fairness, it happens so fast (only 1/5th of a single revolution) that
>youd never know it wasnt in 4x4. the only time the system sucks is if youre
>already moving at speed (front is turning same as rear) so you cant power
>around slick corners and coming down steep grades. for a more precise
>explanation, see http://7slotgrille.com/polaris.jpg

Techically it is a form of limited slip. Even in my Subaru the instant
the front slips the back engages it's really quick but still LSD even
tho it doesn't have the LSD for the sides which is very similar
sounding to the Polaris. To my mind a system is locked if you engage
it and it's locked turning all 4 wheels at the same tiime with no
slippage. AWD is not a bad thing in fact it's usually pretty good.

>> How does the Rhino steer with all 4 wheels locked? I bet it's a bit
>> easier to steer with them locked up, versus a Quad.
>
>thanks to the steering wheel instead of a handlebar, gear reduction makes
>steering very light.....even with the front locker locked.

Sweet! I was wondering how it would compare to a Quad.

>> So essentially it is a Limited Slip system even if it works well it
>> requires slippage in order to activate.
>
>well....limited slip typically refers to side to side differentiation. the
>polaris differentiation is front to rear and mechanically its nothing like a
>typical limited slip system. again, we're only talking 1/5th wheel rotation
>so it happens so fast that its not an issue except in the situations listed
>above. for some that isnt an issue at all. for me i wouldnt own one unless
>i had to in order to fill my needs (as i said i was gonna buy a ranger 6-9
>months ago until i learned about the rhino coming out so i waited on it).

Yes, typically, but it also applies to front and reer if you own and
AWD car. I forget how fast my Scooby can lock up the back but it's in
milliseconds. Plus I also have a rear LSD on the rear wheels so I have
2 LSD's in the car a rear and a center one. Of cousrse it sucks for
rock climbing. :)
The Ranger looks massive for tight trails. I'll have to see if I move
out to Montanna later on in the year or if it's somewhere else. I
actually have to wait until my lease is up butthat's no big deal.

>> Still it looks like the Rhino will outperform it.
>
>depends really. the rhino has more power, more clearance, more suspension
>travel.....if youre talking rocks in most cases the rhino should outperform
>it. in mud i give the edge to the ranger simply because it has 6 wheels
>pulling instead of 4. if youre comparing a 4x4 ranger to a rhino, my money
>goes on the rhino across the board.

Thanks, that's what I was wondering.
Still I'll be interested to see how well it performs over time.
Funny how no one in the ATV group is asking about it.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:17:43 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:an8gpv0c91hes2beiggftp0ph6r9bcahqs@4ax.com.. .
>> Nathan it sure sounds like it's a Front Limited Slip to me and not a
>> true Locked 4x4.
>
>no, there is no limited slip on it. when the cams lock it fully locks both
>wheels. the differentiation is between front and rear, not side to side.
>
>> When fully locked all 4 wheels should be moving
>
>when locked, all 4 wheels are pulling.
>
>> and
>> not just 2 then slip in the front then 4 wheels pulling.
>
>in all fairness, it happens so fast (only 1/5th of a single revolution) that
>youd never know it wasnt in 4x4. the only time the system sucks is if youre
>already moving at speed (front is turning same as rear) so you cant power
>around slick corners and coming down steep grades. for a more precise
>explanation, see http://7slotgrille.com/polaris.jpg

Techically it is a form of limited slip. Even in my Subaru the instant
the front slips the back engages it's really quick but still LSD even
tho it doesn't have the LSD for the sides which is very similar
sounding to the Polaris. To my mind a system is locked if you engage
it and it's locked turning all 4 wheels at the same tiime with no
slippage. AWD is not a bad thing in fact it's usually pretty good.

>> How does the Rhino steer with all 4 wheels locked? I bet it's a bit
>> easier to steer with them locked up, versus a Quad.
>
>thanks to the steering wheel instead of a handlebar, gear reduction makes
>steering very light.....even with the front locker locked.

Sweet! I was wondering how it would compare to a Quad.

>> So essentially it is a Limited Slip system even if it works well it
>> requires slippage in order to activate.
>
>well....limited slip typically refers to side to side differentiation. the
>polaris differentiation is front to rear and mechanically its nothing like a
>typical limited slip system. again, we're only talking 1/5th wheel rotation
>so it happens so fast that its not an issue except in the situations listed
>above. for some that isnt an issue at all. for me i wouldnt own one unless
>i had to in order to fill my needs (as i said i was gonna buy a ranger 6-9
>months ago until i learned about the rhino coming out so i waited on it).

Yes, typically, but it also applies to front and reer if you own and
AWD car. I forget how fast my Scooby can lock up the back but it's in
milliseconds. Plus I also have a rear LSD on the rear wheels so I have
2 LSD's in the car a rear and a center one. Of cousrse it sucks for
rock climbing. :)
The Ranger looks massive for tight trails. I'll have to see if I move
out to Montanna later on in the year or if it's somewhere else. I
actually have to wait until my lease is up butthat's no big deal.

>> Still it looks like the Rhino will outperform it.
>
>depends really. the rhino has more power, more clearance, more suspension
>travel.....if youre talking rocks in most cases the rhino should outperform
>it. in mud i give the edge to the ranger simply because it has 6 wheels
>pulling instead of 4. if youre comparing a 4x4 ranger to a rhino, my money
>goes on the rhino across the board.

Thanks, that's what I was wondering.
Still I'll be interested to see how well it performs over time.
Funny how no one in the ATV group is asking about it.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:17:43 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:an8gpv0c91hes2beiggftp0ph6r9bcahqs@4ax.com.. .
>> Nathan it sure sounds like it's a Front Limited Slip to me and not a
>> true Locked 4x4.
>
>no, there is no limited slip on it. when the cams lock it fully locks both
>wheels. the differentiation is between front and rear, not side to side.
>
>> When fully locked all 4 wheels should be moving
>
>when locked, all 4 wheels are pulling.
>
>> and
>> not just 2 then slip in the front then 4 wheels pulling.
>
>in all fairness, it happens so fast (only 1/5th of a single revolution) that
>youd never know it wasnt in 4x4. the only time the system sucks is if youre
>already moving at speed (front is turning same as rear) so you cant power
>around slick corners and coming down steep grades. for a more precise
>explanation, see http://7slotgrille.com/polaris.jpg

Techically it is a form of limited slip. Even in my Subaru the instant
the front slips the back engages it's really quick but still LSD even
tho it doesn't have the LSD for the sides which is very similar
sounding to the Polaris. To my mind a system is locked if you engage
it and it's locked turning all 4 wheels at the same tiime with no
slippage. AWD is not a bad thing in fact it's usually pretty good.

>> How does the Rhino steer with all 4 wheels locked? I bet it's a bit
>> easier to steer with them locked up, versus a Quad.
>
>thanks to the steering wheel instead of a handlebar, gear reduction makes
>steering very light.....even with the front locker locked.

Sweet! I was wondering how it would compare to a Quad.

>> So essentially it is a Limited Slip system even if it works well it
>> requires slippage in order to activate.
>
>well....limited slip typically refers to side to side differentiation. the
>polaris differentiation is front to rear and mechanically its nothing like a
>typical limited slip system. again, we're only talking 1/5th wheel rotation
>so it happens so fast that its not an issue except in the situations listed
>above. for some that isnt an issue at all. for me i wouldnt own one unless
>i had to in order to fill my needs (as i said i was gonna buy a ranger 6-9
>months ago until i learned about the rhino coming out so i waited on it).

Yes, typically, but it also applies to front and reer if you own and
AWD car. I forget how fast my Scooby can lock up the back but it's in
milliseconds. Plus I also have a rear LSD on the rear wheels so I have
2 LSD's in the car a rear and a center one. Of cousrse it sucks for
rock climbing. :)
The Ranger looks massive for tight trails. I'll have to see if I move
out to Montanna later on in the year or if it's somewhere else. I
actually have to wait until my lease is up butthat's no big deal.

>> Still it looks like the Rhino will outperform it.
>
>depends really. the rhino has more power, more clearance, more suspension
>travel.....if youre talking rocks in most cases the rhino should outperform
>it. in mud i give the edge to the ranger simply because it has 6 wheels
>pulling instead of 4. if youre comparing a 4x4 ranger to a rhino, my money
>goes on the rhino across the board.

Thanks, that's what I was wondering.
Still I'll be interested to see how well it performs over time.
Funny how no one in the ATV group is asking about it.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:55:29 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:ka8gpvs0h4a1ikbnolhl0jlk4d6qhvt8bj@4ax.com.. .
>> I think a Jeep is rated to pull 1500 lbs.
>
>2000 pounds. interesting enough, the identical jeep in europe is rated at
>5000 pounds. i wonder if right hand drive somehow magically gives it more
>capability? :-)

Maybe they are Metric pounds? LOL!
The Brits don't have much they tow that is that much weight.
I've been over there many times and they don't seem to tow like we do
here. I thoughtthe difference was due to the automatic tranny?

>> I might even check out the 6x6 Rangers if they handle mud so well.
>
>theyre amazing in the mud, but i wouldnt buy one on that alone. the rhino
>was pretty impressive in the mud as well. probably not quite as much as the
>6x6, but its certainly no slouch either. ill know more when im able to open
>it up after the engine is broken in.

Around this area we have endless amounts of Mud. We even had that
sandy mud that would suck the boots right off your feet no matter how
tight they were tied. Man, that stuff was awful!
The guys in the Jeeps loved it! That stuff stuck like nothing else. It
was almost impossible to wash it off the first time.
Now that area is all new houses.
Be interesting to really see how well the Rhino does compared to teh
Quads and the 6x6 Ranger.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:55:29 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:ka8gpvs0h4a1ikbnolhl0jlk4d6qhvt8bj@4ax.com.. .
>> I think a Jeep is rated to pull 1500 lbs.
>
>2000 pounds. interesting enough, the identical jeep in europe is rated at
>5000 pounds. i wonder if right hand drive somehow magically gives it more
>capability? :-)

Maybe they are Metric pounds? LOL!
The Brits don't have much they tow that is that much weight.
I've been over there many times and they don't seem to tow like we do
here. I thoughtthe difference was due to the automatic tranny?

>> I might even check out the 6x6 Rangers if they handle mud so well.
>
>theyre amazing in the mud, but i wouldnt buy one on that alone. the rhino
>was pretty impressive in the mud as well. probably not quite as much as the
>6x6, but its certainly no slouch either. ill know more when im able to open
>it up after the engine is broken in.

Around this area we have endless amounts of Mud. We even had that
sandy mud that would suck the boots right off your feet no matter how
tight they were tied. Man, that stuff was awful!
The guys in the Jeeps loved it! That stuff stuck like nothing else. It
was almost impossible to wash it off the first time.
Now that area is all new houses.
Be interesting to really see how well the Rhino does compared to teh
Quads and the 6x6 Ranger.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:55:29 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
<JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:

>"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:ka8gpvs0h4a1ikbnolhl0jlk4d6qhvt8bj@4ax.com.. .
>> I think a Jeep is rated to pull 1500 lbs.
>
>2000 pounds. interesting enough, the identical jeep in europe is rated at
>5000 pounds. i wonder if right hand drive somehow magically gives it more
>capability? :-)

Maybe they are Metric pounds? LOL!
The Brits don't have much they tow that is that much weight.
I've been over there many times and they don't seem to tow like we do
here. I thoughtthe difference was due to the automatic tranny?

>> I might even check out the 6x6 Rangers if they handle mud so well.
>
>theyre amazing in the mud, but i wouldnt buy one on that alone. the rhino
>was pretty impressive in the mud as well. probably not quite as much as the
>6x6, but its certainly no slouch either. ill know more when im able to open
>it up after the engine is broken in.

Around this area we have endless amounts of Mud. We even had that
sandy mud that would suck the boots right off your feet no matter how
tight they were tied. Man, that stuff was awful!
The guys in the Jeeps loved it! That stuff stuck like nothing else. It
was almost impossible to wash it off the first time.
Now that area is all new houses.
Be interesting to really see how well the Rhino does compared to teh
Quads and the 6x6 Ranger.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:16:35 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:14:48 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>> <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:3n7fpvgocumuasg53qg7tb5ltug8emub1g@4ax.com.. .
>> >> My car is rated to tow 1,000 pounds according
>> >> to the dealer.
>> >
>> >the ratings are typically conservative ratings with the idiot factor being
>> >factored in. with a little sense, you can safely tow a good bit above the
>> >rating. i think the 6x6 comes in around 1500 pounds and that plus the
>> >trailer weight would probably be pushing it. a 1049lb machine being towed
>> >on a 200lb trailer (mine is grossly over-built which you can see in the
>> >pictures) should be no problem.
>>
>> The cops heer just love to stop people with trailers. Even more if
>> it's a car pulling it. Thewy have these inflatable pillows they have
>> you drive on and it weighs the trailer. The fines are very high for
>> being overweight. I don't know how high but enough that I don't want
>> to deal with it. I think a Jeep is rated to pull 1500 lbs.
>> My car is rated to pull 1000 lbs. 500 over even at $10 per pound over
>> and you are broke fast.
>> I'll have to verify everything with the dealer once I make up my mind.
>> I might even check out the 6x6 Rangers if they handle mud so well.
>
>Your Jeep likely has the standard 2000 lb limit.

Nope, I curently have a Subaru WRX and it's rated for 1,000 lbs.
A Manual Jeep would be 2,000 lbs. tho.

 

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:16:35 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:14:48 GMT, "Nathan Collier"
>> <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote:
>>
>> >"Scooby Don't" <Scooby_do_not@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:3n7fpvgocumuasg53qg7tb5ltug8emub1g@4ax.com.. .
>> >> My car is rated to tow 1,000 pounds according
>> >> to the dealer.
>> >
>> >the ratings are typically conservative ratings with the idiot factor being
>> >factored in. with a little sense, you can safely tow a good bit above the
>> >rating. i think the 6x6 comes in around 1500 pounds and that plus the
>> >trailer weight would probably be pushing it. a 1049lb machine being towed
>> >on a 200lb trailer (mine is grossly over-built which you can see in the
>> >pictures) should be no problem.
>>
>> The cops heer just love to stop people with trailers. Even more if
>> it's a car pulling it. Thewy have these inflatable pillows they have
>> you drive on and it weighs the trailer. The fines are very high for
>> being overweight. I don't know how high but enough that I don't want
>> to deal with it. I think a Jeep is rated to pull 1500 lbs.
>> My car is rated to pull 1000 lbs. 500 over even at $10 per pound over
>> and you are broke fast.
>> I'll have to verify everything with the dealer once I make up my mind.
>> I might even check out the 6x6 Rangers if they handle mud so well.
>
>Your Jeep likely has the standard 2000 lb limit.

Nope, I curently have a Subaru WRX and it's rated for 1,000 lbs.
A Manual Jeep would be 2,000 lbs. tho.