OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
04-30-2004, 06:28 PM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
04-30-2004, 06:28 PM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
04-30-2004, 06:28 PM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
c wrote:
>
> Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or .com.
> The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return email
> address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it is
> very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
>
> Chris
>
> "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them
> in
> > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved,
> but
> > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> known
> > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> >
> > My theories:
> >
> > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > unchallenged.
> >
> > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
> >
> > Which is likely more correct?
> > n.
> >
> >
04-30-2004, 06:53 PM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
Very possibly so Mike. I use IRC for communicating with the people I export
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
email
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
04-30-2004, 06:53 PM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
Very possibly so Mike. I use IRC for communicating with the people I export
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
email
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
04-30-2004, 06:53 PM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
Very possibly so Mike. I use IRC for communicating with the people I export
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
email
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
04-30-2004, 06:53 PM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: recent explosion of SPAM.
Very possibly so Mike. I use IRC for communicating with the people I export
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
email
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
to. It's nice because we can send files when needed, but lately IRC has been
under DOS attacks and there have been times that most of the servers are
nearly impossible to connect to.
Chris
"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4092D31D.F075EC43@sympatico.ca...
> My son said they are IRC attacks, especially the scr ones.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> c wrote:
> >
> > Many of these are actually viruses. If you note some of them have an
> > attachment, and others have a link to a download that ends in .scr or
..com.
> > The weird thing is that most of them have shawcabke.net as the return
> > address, but likely most of the addresses are spoofed. In any event, it
is
> > very wise to ignore them or add them to your filters.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > "Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote in message
> > news:1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net...
> > > I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters
set
> > > up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing
them
> > in
> > > most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we
moved,
> > but
> > > nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm
the
> > > only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is
> > known
> > > to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
> > >
> > > My theories:
> > >
> > > 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> > > unchallenged.
> > >
> > > 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming
like
> > > crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will
pass.
> > >
> > > Which is likely more correct?
> > > n.
> > >
> > >
04-30-2004, 07:32 PM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
In article <1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net>,
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
04-30-2004, 07:32 PM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
In article <1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net>,
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
04-30-2004, 07:32 PM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
In article <1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net>,
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
