OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
04-30-2004, 07:32 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
In article <1uukc.12$2L4.6231@news.uswest.net>,
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
"Nathan Otis" <na@spam.smeat.net> wrote:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
Qwest, the company formerly known as US Worst. I'm on Comcast, and
seeing none of it, thank goodness.
B
--
Brian Heller
It is easier to tame wild beasts
than to conquer the human mind.
04-30-2004, 10:03 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Roughly 4/30/04 08:42, Nathan Otis's monkeys randomly typed:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
04-30-2004, 10:03 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Roughly 4/30/04 08:42, Nathan Otis's monkeys randomly typed:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
04-30-2004, 10:03 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Roughly 4/30/04 08:42, Nathan Otis's monkeys randomly typed:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
04-30-2004, 10:03 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
Roughly 4/30/04 08:42, Nathan Otis's monkeys randomly typed:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
3. A goodly number of those messages are from worm infected computers.
4. There are more jerkoffs with computers these days.
--
Evolution is merely survival of the minimally adequate
05-02-2004, 09:45 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news server/ISP for
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
05-02-2004, 09:45 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news server/ISP for
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
05-02-2004, 09:45 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news server/ISP for
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
05-02-2004, 09:45 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news server/ISP for
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
the last 2+ years.
Nathan Otis wrote:
> I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their own filters set
> up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality posts? I've been seeing them in
> most of the groups I frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
> nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two days. If I'm the
> only one who has seen it, I'm fully prepared to blame Qwest (which is known
> to blow donkeys themselves) and ignore it.
>
> My theories:
>
> 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these messages through,
> unchallenged.
>
> 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and they're spamming like
> crazy cause of the perverse high they get from it. This too, will pass.
>
> Which is likely more correct?
> n.
>
>
05-03-2004, 01:41 AM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT: recent explosion of SPAM.
In
news:yuhlc.2933$8S1.1960@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> was injured because:
| I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news
| server/ISP for the last 2+ years.
|
| Nathan Otis wrote:
|
|| I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their
own
|| filters set up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality
|| posts? I've been seeing them in most of the groups I
|| frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
|| nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two
|| days. If I'm the only one who has seen it, I'm fully
prepared
|| to blame Qwest (which is known to blow donkeys
themselves)
|| and ignore it.
||
|| My theories:
||
|| 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these
messages
|| through, unchallenged.
||
|| 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and
they're
|| spamming like crazy cause of the perverse high they get
from
|| it. This too, will pass.
||
|| Which is likely more correct?
|| n.
Did no one at all make a comment having to do with the
synthetic meat by-product known by the same name, or did I
miss it...?
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
Pull my finger to reply by email.
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
I Love My O|||||||O
news:yuhlc.2933$8S1.1960@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> was injured because:
| I am seeing more SPAM lately (last month +/-). Same news
| server/ISP for the last 2+ years.
|
| Nathan Otis wrote:
|
|| I'm just curious if everyone else (who doesn't have their
own
|| filters set up) is seeing all these --- and beastiality
|| posts? I've been seeing them in most of the groups I
|| frequent. I remember seeing a few before we moved, but
|| nothing like the MASSIVE influx I've seen in the last two
|| days. If I'm the only one who has seen it, I'm fully
prepared
|| to blame Qwest (which is known to blow donkeys
themselves)
|| and ignore it.
||
|| My theories:
||
|| 1. Qwest really really really stinks and lets these
messages
|| through, unchallenged.
||
|| 2. Someone has just discovered how to do this, and
they're
|| spamming like crazy cause of the perverse high they get
from
|| it. This too, will pass.
||
|| Which is likely more correct?
|| n.
Did no one at all make a comment having to do with the
synthetic meat by-product known by the same name, or did I
miss it...?
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
Pull my finger to reply by email.
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
I Love My O|||||||O